Article published In: Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 42:1 (2018) ► pp.89–111
Interlinguistics / Interlingüística / Interlinguistik / Interlingvistiko
Esperanto as a tool in classroom foreign language learning in England
Published online: 24 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00013.roe
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00013.roe
Abstract
Previous work has examined the potential of Esperanto as a pedagogical tool in classroom foreign language learning in England, where limited language input of sometimes as little as one hour per week is the norm. The work reviewed here focuses on child learners aged 6 to 12 and was carried out between 2006 and 2016. Two Esperanto-based language awareness programmes have provided primarily descriptive insights, suggesting that learning Esperanto may result in greater metalinguistic awareness and more positive attitudes to other languages and cultures. However, the language awareness programmes were implemented without matched comparison groups and therefore could not reveal whether the learning of Esperanto would lead to different results than the learning of other languages. Classroom-based research that included matched comparison groups has sought to address this issue. Specifically, three studies investigated the questions of whether learning Esperanto as opposed to learning other languages would help enhance children’s metalinguistic awareness and thus contribute in turn to more successful learning in a limited-input classroom context. On the one hand, results indicate that for novice child learners, Esperanto was easier to learn than French, and that learning Esperanto may have a levelling effect that compensates for individual differences between children. On the other hand, the findings also show that these apparent advantages of Esperanto did not translate into measurably greater benefits for the development of metalinguistic awareness, or greater subsequent success in learning another foreign language. Moreover, learning Esperanto could not compensate for low language learning aptitude. In view of these sobering results, a number of proposals are made on how to take forward the research agenda. These proposals include further research into the potential benefits of using form-focused instruction (based on any language) with children as well as the effects of learning Esperanto in novice adult learners.
Zusammenfassung
Esperanto als didaktische Hilfe im Fremdsprachenunterricht in England
Eine Reihe von Forschungsprojekten hat sich mit der Frage beschäftigt, ob Esperanto als didaktische Hilfe im Fremdsprachenunterricht in England nutzbringend eingesetzt werden kann, da normalerweise nur bis zu einer Stunde Fremdsprachenunterricht pro Woche im Lehrplan angesetzt ist. Wir legen eine Kritik von Studien vor, die zwischen 2006 und 2016 den Fremdsprachenerwerb von Kindern im Alter von 6 bis 12 Jahren untersucht haben. Zwei Unterrichtsinitiativen, die auf den Erwerb von Sprachbewusstsein mit Hilfe von Esperanto ausgerichtet waren, hatten zum Ergebnis, dass die Begegnung mit Esperanto zu besserem Sprachbewusstsein und einer positiveren Einstellung gegenüber anderen Sprachen und Kulturen führen kann. Es gab jedoch keine Vergleichsgruppen, so dass aus den vorliegenden Ergebnissen nicht ersichtlich ist, ob die Begegnung mit einer anderen Sprache zu einem ähnlichen Resultat geführt hätte. Infolge dieses Problems haben neuere Forschungsprojekte in Schulen Vergleichsgruppen eingeschlossen. Drei Studien haben sich speziell mit der Frage auseinandergesetzt, ob der Erwerb von Esperanto im Vergleich zum Erwerb von anderen Sprachen zu besserem Sprachbewusstsein bei Kindern führen kann und somit langfristig den erfolgreichen Erwerb von weiteren Sprachen ermöglicht, selbst wenn nur bis zu einer Stunde Fremdsprachenunterricht pro Woche erteilt wird. Einerseits zeigen die Ergebnisse dieser Studien, dass der Erwerb von Esperanto den teilnehmenden Schülern und Schülerinnen leichter fiel als der Erwerb von Französisch, und es wurde deutlich, dass der Erwerb von Esperanto Unterschiede zwischen einzelnen Kindern scheinbar ausgleichen kann. Andererseits zeigen diese Studien aber auch, dass der Erwerb von Esperanto nicht zu messbar besserem Sprachbewusstsein führte. Zudem waren keine größeren Erfolge beim Erlernen von einer weiteren Fremdsprache nachweisbar. Außerdem konnte der Erwerb von Esperanto mangelnde Sprachlernfähigkeiten nicht ausgleichen. Angesichts dieser ernüchternden Ergebnisse unterbreiten wir richtungsweisende Vorschläge für zukünftige Forschungsprojekte, die nicht nur das Potenzial von formorientiertem Sprachunterricht im Kindesalter untersuchen sollten, sondern auch den Erwerb von Esperanto durch Erwachsene, die zum ersten Mal eine Zweitsprache erlernen.
Resumo
Esperanto kiel ilo en la lernado de fremdaj lingvoj en lernejaj klaŝcambroj en Anglio
Antaŭaj studoj esploris la potencialon de Esperanto kiel pedagogia ilo en la lernado de fremdaj lingvoj en lernejaj klaŝcambroj en Anglio, kie instruado estas tipe minimuma, ofte ne pli ol horo en ĉiu semajno. Studoj ekzamenitaj en la nuna referaĵo estis efektivigitaj inter 2006 kaj 2016 kaj fokusiĝas al lernejanoj 6- ĝis 12-jaraĝaj. Du instruprogramoj surbaze de Esperanto kun la celo plialtigi la lingvan konscion de lernejanoj kondukis al precipe priskribajn eltrovojn, sugestante, ke la lernado de Esperanto povas konduki al pli ampleksa metalingva konscio kaj pli pozitivaj sintenoj al aliaj lingvoj kaj kulturoj. Tamen, tiuj ĉi programoj estis efektivigitaj sen kongruaj kompargrupoj kaj sekve ne eblis konkludi ĉu la lernado de Esperanto kondukus al malsamaj rezultoj ol la lernado de aliaj lingvoj. Esploroj en klasĉambraj kuntekstoj kun kongruaj kompargrupoj celis pli efike trakti la demandon. Specife, tri studoj esploris ĉu la lernado de Esperanto kontraŭe al la lernado de aliaj lingvoj povus havi bonan efikon sur la evoluo de metalingva konscio ĉe infanoj kaj tiel kontribui al ilia sekva pli sukcesa lernado de fremda lingvo en klasĉambra kunteksto kie instruado estas minimuma. Unuflanke, rezultoj indikas, ke por junaj komencantoj Esperanto estas lingvo pli facile lernebla ol la franca, kaj ke la lernado de Esperanto eble havas niveligan efikon, kiu reduktas diferencojn inter individuaj infanoj. Aliflanke, eltrovoj montras ankaŭ, ke tiuj ĉi ŝajnaj avantaĝoj de Esperanto ne videblis en mezureble pli grandaj avantaĝoj por la evoluo de lingva konscio, aŭ pli sukcesa sekva lernado de alia fremda lingvo. Krome, la lernado de Esperanto ne povis kompensi malaltan lingvolernan kapablon. Konsiderante ĉi tiujn sobrigajn rezultojn, oni konklude faras iujn proponojn pri la antaŭenigado de la esplorprogramo.
Article outline
- Language awareness projects drawing on Esperanto
- Classroom research comparing Esperanto with other languages
- General discussion and conclusions
- Note
References
References (54)
Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
Baker, C. (2006). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (4th ed.). Clevedon: Mutilingual Matters.
Barton, A., Bragg, J., & Serratrice, L. (2009). ‘Discovering language’ in primary school: An evaluation of a language awareness programme. Language Learning Journal, 37(2), 145–164.
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bialystok, E., Peets, K., & Moreno, S. (2014). Producing bilinguals through immersion education: Development of metalinguistic awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 351, 177–191.
Bishop, A. J. (1997). EKPAROLI project report 1994–1997. [URL]> (15 July 2011).
Bouffard, L., & Sarkar, M. (2008). Training 8-year-old immersion students in metalinguistic analysis: An innovation in form-focused pedagogy. Language Awareness, 17(1), 3–24.
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (2002). Modern language aptitude test – Elementary: MLAT-E. Rockville, MD: Second Language Testing Foundation.
Corsetti, R., & LaTorre, M. (1995). Quale lingua prima. Language Problems and Language Planning, 191, 26–46.
Ellis, N. C. (1994). Consciousness in second language learning: Psychological perspectives on the role of conscious processes in vocabulary acquisition. AILA Review, 111, 37–56.
Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227–275.
Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 147–171.
Fantini, A., & Reagan, T. (1992). Esperanto and education: Toward a research agenda. [URL] 8 July 2011.
Formaggio, E. (1990). Lerneja eksperimento pri lernfacileco kaj transfero en la fremdlingvoinstruado. Internacia Pedagogia Revuo, 201, 1–9.
Halloran, J. H. (1952). A four year experiment in Esperanto as an introduction to French. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 22(3), 200–204.
Hanan, R. (2015). The effectiveness of explicit grammar instruction for the young foreign language learner: A classroom-based experimental study. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of York.
Harley, B. (1998). The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 156–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129–140.
Jones, N., Barnes, A., & Hunt, M. (2005). Thinking through languages: A multi-lingual approach to primary school languages. Language Learning Journal, 32(1), 63–67.
Karmiloff, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2002). Pathways to language: From fetus to adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lichtman, K. (2013). Developmental comparisons of implicit and explicit language learning. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 93–108.
(2016). Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners? Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 707–730.
Lodge, O. (2004). School teaching and school reform. London: Elibron Classics. Original publication 1905.
Markarian, R. (1964). The educational value of Esperanto teaching in the schools. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
Masson, H. (2006). Quel parti la language française peut-elle tirer de la défense et de l’illustration de l’espéranto? La Informilo, 1331, 25–28.
Maxwell, D. 1988. On the acquisition of Esperanto. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 101, 51–61.
Milton, J. & Alexiou, T. (2006). Language aptitude development in young learners. In C. Abello-Contesse, R. Chacón-Beltrán, M. D. López-Chiménez & M. del Mar Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Age in L2 acquisition and teaching (pp. 177–192). Oxford: Peter Lang.
Porter, A. (2014). An early start to French literacy: Learning the spoken and written word simultaneously in English primary schools. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton.
Rodríguez, S., Luis, H., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2016). Language learning aptitude and working memory as predictors of instructed adult L2 learners’ explicit and implicit L2 knowledge. Paper presented at the Cognitive Approaches to Language Pedagogy 2 conference, Basel, Switzerland, 10–11 June.
Roehr, K. (2012). The Springboard to Languages evaluation project: a summary report. In A. Tellier (Ed.), Esperanto as a starter language for child second-language learners in the primary school (pp. 23–34). Stoke-on-Trent: Esperanto UK.
Roehr, K., & Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A. (2009). The status of metalinguistic knowledge in instructed adult L2 learning. Language Awareness, 18(2), 165–181.
Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Serrano, R. (2011). From metalinguistic instruction to metalinguistic knowledge, and from metalinguistic knowledge to performance in error correction and oral production tasks. Language Awareness, 20(1), 1–16.
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2009). Long-term crosslinguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning, 59(1), 203–243.
(2011). Subcomponents of second-language aptitude and second-language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 253–273.
Svalberg, A. M. -L. (2007). Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40(4), 287–308.
Symoens, E. (1989). The socio-political, educational and cultural roots of Esperanto. Antwerpen: Internacia Ligo de Esperantistaj Instruistoj.
(1992). Al nova internacia lingvopolitiko: La propedeŭtika valoro de Esperanto (Vol. 28–29E1 Esperanto-Dokumento). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
Tellier, A. (2013). Developing a measure of metalinguistic awareness for children aged 8–11. In K. Roehr and G. A. Gánem-Gutiérrez (Eds.), The metalinguistic dimension in instructed second language learning (pp. 15–43). London: Bloomsbury.
(2015). Metalinguistic awareness and foreign language learning in primary school: A classroom study with children aged 8 to 9 years. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex.
(Ed.). (2012). Esperanto as a starter language for child second-language learners in the primary school. Stoke-on-Trent: Esperanto UK.
Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2013a). The development of language learning aptitude and metalinguistic awareness in primary-school children: A classroom study. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 62(1), 1–28.
(2013b). Metalinguistic awareness in children with differing language learning experience. EuroSLA Yearbook, 131, 81–108.
(2017). Raising children’s metalinguistic awareness to enhance classroom second language learning. In M. del P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 22–48). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Thorndike, E. L., & Kennon, L. (1927). Progress in learning an auxiliary language: A report. New York, NY: Institute of Educational Research, Columbia University.
Tinsley, T., & Board, K. (2016). Language trends 2015/16: The state of language learning in primary and secondary schools in England. British Council. Reading: Education Development Trust. 511. [URL].
White, J., & Ranta, L. (2002). Examining the interface between metalinguistic task performance and oral production in a second language. Language Awareness, 11(4), 259–290.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Xu, Yufeng & Yanfen Zou
Buts, Jan
Coluzzi, Paolo
2022. How learning Toki Pona may help improving communication strategies in a foreign or second language. Language Problems and Language Planning 46:1 ► pp. 78 ff.
Aray, Başak
Schreyer, Christine
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
