Cover not available

In:L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts
Edited by Mimi Li and Meixiu Zhang
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 59] 2023
► pp. 229–247

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
Assessing collaborative writing

Current challenges and future possibilities

 | University of Melbourne
 | University of Melbourne
Published online: 17 August 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.59.10sto
Over the past two decades, we have witnessed the widespread use of collaborative writing tasks in second language classes driven in part by advances in technology. These advances have led to noticeable changes in the design and implementation of these tasks as well as their inclusion in assessed classwork. However, assessing collaborative writing is challenging because it requires assessors to consider what aspects of the construct of collaborative writing (product, process, nature of collaboration) should be included in the assessment criteria, and how these aspects can be reliably assessed. In this chapter we discuss these challenges, consider some suggestions on how to assess collaborative writing, and the pedagogical implications of assessing collaborative writing. We conclude by outlining future research directions.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Methodological considerations that impact assessment options
  • Assessing collaborative writing: Current challenges
    • Assessing the jointly written text (product)
    • Assessing the writing process and collaboration
  • Assessing collaborative writing: Future possibilities
    • Possibilities for classroom-based assessment
    • Possibilities for high-stakes assessment
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (68)
References
Abrams, Z. (2016). Exploring collaboratively written L2 texts among first-year learners of German in Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1259–1270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 22–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alderson, C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. The interface between learning and assessment. Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2012). Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing group dynamics and revision processes in wikis. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 431–448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aufa, F., & Storch, N. (2021). Learner interaction in blended collaborative L2 writing activities. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.) Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning (pp. 151–176). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aydun, Z., & Yildiz, S. (2014). Using wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 160–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailey, K. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 257–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for Specific Purposes. Palgrave McMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernadin, H. M., Cooke, D. K. & Villanova, P. (2000). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 232–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradley, L., Lindström, B., & Rystedt, H. (2010). Rationalities of collaboration for language learning in a wiki. ReCALL, 22(2), 247–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for Specific Purposes. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the ‘conversation of mankind’. College English, 46(7), 635–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing, 27(1), 5–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2008). Learning to self-assess oral performance in English: A longitudinal case study. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 235–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, W. N., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 233–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 37–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, L. (2009). The influence of interlocutor proficiency in a paired oral assessment. Language Testing, 26(3), 367–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Vita, G. (2001). The use of group work in large and diverse business management classes. Some critical issues. International Journal of Management Education, 1(3), 26–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deane, P. (2013). On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct. Assessing Writing, 18(1), 7–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dikli, S., & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated essay scoring feedback for second language writers: how does it compare to instructor feedback? Assessing Writing 22(1), 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fellenz, M. R. (2006). Toward fairness in assessing student groupwork: A protocol for peer evaluation of individual contributions. Journal of Management Education, 30(4), 570–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harding, L., Alderson, C., & Brunfaut, T. (2015). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign language: Elaborating on diagnostic principles. Language Testing, 32(3), 317–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Judd, T., Kennedy, G., & Cropper, S. (2010). Using wikis for collaborative learning: Assessing collaboration through contribution. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 341–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-H. (2010). An argument-based validity inquiry into the empirically-derived descriptor-based diagnostic (EDD) assessment in ESL academic writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto.
Knoch, U. (2021). Assessing writing. In G. Fulcher & L. Harding (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language testing. (pp. 236–253). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoch, U., & Macqueen, S. (2020). Assessing English for professional purposes: Language and the workplace. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoch, U., May, L., Macqueen, S., Pill, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Transitioning from university to the workplace: Stakeholder perceptions of academic and professional writing demands. IELTS Research Report 2016/1.
Lam, R. (2017). Taking stock of portfolio assessment scholarship: From research to practice. Assessing Writing, 31, 84–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Portfolio assessment for the teaching and learning of writing. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882–904. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, M., Liu, L., & Liu, L. (2018). Group awareness increases student engagement in online collaborative writing. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis. (pp. 19–76). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, J., & Cheng, L. (2018). Preparing students to take tests. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. (pp. 1–7). Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: Process and product. Computers and Education, 40(4), 377–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. (2011). Situating the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of L2 writing. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 3–16). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Min, H.-T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moss, P. A. (2016). Shifting the focus of validity for test use. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 236–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, A. M., & Hoy, A. W. (2002). Promoting thinking through peer learning. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 2–4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olson, J. S., Wang, D., Olson, G. M., Zhang, J. (2017). How people write together now: Beginning the investigation with advanced undergraduates in a project course. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 24(1), 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahimi, M. (2013). Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 67–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2016). A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated modes. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning (pp. 267–290). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shermis, M. D. (2014). State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future directions from a United States demonstration. Assessing Writing, 20, 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Implementing and assessing collaborative writing activities in EAP classes. In J. Bitchener, N. Storch, & R. Wette (Eds.), Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches (pp. 130–144). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Collaborative writing: Promoting languaging among language learners. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.) Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning (pp. 13–34). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Theoretical perspectives on L2 writing and language learning in collaborative writing and the collaborative processing of written corrective feedback. In R. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 22–34). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair-work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N., Zhao, H., & Morton, J. (forthcoming). Multiple perspectives on group work in a multicultural context. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics.
Such, B. (2019). Scaffolding English language learners for online collaborative activities. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 473–481. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, C. E. (2012). Classroom assessment. In G. Fulcher & F. Davidson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language testing. (pp. 65–78). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. (2016). Learning-oriented assessment in the classroom. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment. (pp. 255–274). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, M. (2015). The centrality of cognitive diagnostic assessment for advancing secondary school ESL students’ writing: A mixed methods study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto.
Walker, A. (2002). British psychology students’ perceptions of group-work and peer assessment. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 28–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wall, D. (2012). Washback. In G. Fulcher & F. Davidson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language testing (pp. 79–72). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, D., Olson, J. S., Zhang, J., Nguyen, T., & Olson, G. M. (2015). DocuViz: Visualizing collaborative writing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1865–1874). Association for Computing Machinery.
Wang, L. (2019). The impact of computer-mediated contexts on interaction pattern of ESL learners in collaborative writing. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(5), 547–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigle, S. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeh, W.-C. (2014). Exploring how collaborative dialogues facilitate synchronous collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 23–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Akoto, M., & Li, M. (2021). Digital multimodal composing in post-secondary settings: a review of the empirical landscape. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, M., & Chen, W. (2022). Assessing collaborative writing in the digital age: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing. 57, 100868. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Gibbons, J., & Li, M. (2021). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 classrooms: A systematic review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, 100854. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Collaborative writing in face-to-face settings: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100753. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Elola, Idoia, M. Camino Bueno-Alastuey & María Victoria López-Pérez
2025. Integrating collaborative digital multimodal tasks in Spanish as a second language course. ReCALL 37:3 ► pp. 368 ff. DOI logo
Levrai, Peter
2025. What to assess when assessing collaborative assignments: the practitioner perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue