In:Language Teacher Development in Digital Contexts
Edited by Hayriye Kayi-Aydar and Jonathon Reinhardt
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 57] 2022
► pp. 9–28
Chapter 1Negotiating equitable language teaching practices
Membership and epistemic stance in asynchronous online discussions
Published online: 20 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.57.01war
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.57.01war
Abstract
This chapter explores preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) forum discussions in an online language teacher education (OLTE) course to
understand how participants discursively construct and display their stance
toward equity-enriched pedagogies and practices. Framed in a post-cognitive stance toward epistemics as constructed in interaction, and
drawing on conversation analytic membership categorization analysis, findings illustrate how participants’ epistemic stance was contingent
on the categories with which they were aligned. While PSTs supported equitable practices around bilingualism when evoking membership
categories of language user and course participant, PSTs questioned the possibility of equitable multilingual education when taking up the
stance of (future) teacher. This analysis offers insight into the role of OLTE for supporting teacher-learners in building equity-enriched
orientations essential for supporting multilingual students.
Keywords: preservice teachers, online course, stance, equity-enriched pedagogy
Article outline
- Equity-enriched orientations to language teaching
- Equity-enriched orientations to teacher education
- Post-cognitive view on epistemic stance
- Theoretical framework
- Methods
- Context and participants
- Data analysis and warrants
- Findings
- Embracing linguistic pluralism and opposing English-only practices
- Highlighting linguistic pluralism as an equity-enriched practice
- Being conflicted as a language teacher
- Discussion and implications for language teacher education in digital contexts
- Conclusion
References
References (49)
Blackledge, A. (2000). Monolingual
ideologies in multilingual states: Language, hegemony and social justice in Western liberal
democracies. Sociolinguistic Studies/Estudios de
Sociolingüística, 1(2), 25–46.
Borden, R. S. (2014). The
English only movement: Revisiting cultural hegemony. Multicultural
Perspectives, 16, 229–233.
Buttny, R., & Cohen, J. R. (2007). Drawing
on the words of others at public hearings: Zoning, Wal-Mart, and the threat to the
aquifer. Language in
Society, 36(5), 735–756.
Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., Hill, M., & Ludlow, L. (2016). Initial
teacher education: What does it take to put equity at the center? Teaching and
Teacher
Education, 57, 67–78.
de Jong, E. (2013). Policy
discourses and U.S. language in education policies. Peabody Journal of
Education, 88(1), 98–111.
Delahunty, J. (2018). Connecting
to learn, learning to connect: Thinking together in asynchronous forum
discussion. Linguistics and
Education, 46, 12–22.
Edwards, D. (1993). But
what do children really think? Discourse analysis and conceptual content in children’s
talk. Cognition and
Instruction, 11(3/4), 207–225.
Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing
asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future
directions. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 44(3), 469–483.
García, O., Johnson, S. I., & Seltzer, K. (2017). The
translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for
Learning. Caslo.
Gorski, P. (2016). Rethinking
the role of “culture” in educational equity: From cultural competence to equity
literacy. Multicultural
Perspectives, 18(4), 221–226.
Hadaway, N. (1993). Encountering
linguistic diversity through letters: Preparing preservice teachers for second language
learners. Equity & Excellence in
Education, 26(3), 25–30.
Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics
in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language
& Social
Interaction, 45(1), 1–29.
(2012b). The
epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on
Language & Social
Interaction, 45(1), 30–52.
Kaltenböch, G., Mihatsch, W., & Schneider, S. (2010). Introduction. In G. Kaltenböch, W. Mihatsch, & S. Schneider (Eds.), New
approaches to
hedging. (pp. 1–14). Emerald.
Kärkkäinen, E. (2006). Stance
taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text &
Talk, 26(6), 699–731.
Kasper, G. (2009). Categories,
context, and comparison in conversation
analysis. In H. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction:
Multilingual
perspectives (pp. 1–28). University of Hawai’i.
Knight, S., & Littleton, K. (2017). Socialising
epistemic cognition. Educational Research
Review, 21(Supplement
C), 17–32.
, (2018). A
discursive approach to the analysis of epistemic cognition. Learning, Culture, and
Social
Interaction, 16, 55–69.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). It’s
not the culture of poverty, it’s the poverty of culture: The problem with teacher
education. Anthropology & Education
Quarterly, 37(2), 104–109.
Lazar, A. M. (2018). Creating
teachers of promise: Growth toward equity-mindedness in a landscape of
practice. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 71(1), 308–318.
Lazar, A., Edwards, P., & McMillon, G. (2012). Bridging
literacy and equity: The essential guide to social equity teaching. Teachers College Press.
Lee, K., & Brett, C. (2015). Dialogic
understanding of teachers’ online transformative learning: A qualitative case study of teacher discussions in a graduate-level online
course. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 46, 72–83.
Lefstein, A., Louie, N., Segal, A., & Becher, A. (2020). Taking
stock of research on teacher collaborative discourse: Theory and method in a nascent
field. Teaching and Teacher
Education.
Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English
with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (2nd
ed.). Routledge.
Lucas, T., Strom, K., Bratkovich, M., & Wnuk, J. (2018). Inservice
preparation of mainstream teachers of ELLs: A review of the empirical
literature. Educational
Forum, 82(2), 156–173.
Lucas, T., & Villegas, A. M. (2013). Preparing
linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in preservice teacher
education. Theory into
Practice, 52(2), 98–109.
Murray, D. (2013). A
case for online English language teacher education. Trustees of the International Research Foundation.
Murray, D. E., & Christison, M. (2018). Online
language teacher education: A review of the literature. Aqueduto, Norwich. Retrieved on
5 July 2021 from [URL]
National Center for Education
Statistics. (2020). Characteristics of public
school teachers. Retrieved on 5 July 2021
from [URL].
Newton, J., Oudghiri, S., Obenchain, K., & Phillion, J. (2020). Preservice
teachers’ understandings of social justice within the context of study abroad
programs. Theory into
Practice, 59(3), 259–268.
Nieto, S. (2000). Placing
equity front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a New
Century. Journal of Teacher
Education, 51(3), 180–187.
Orellana, M. F. (2015). Immigrant
children in transcultural spaces: Language, learning, and
love. Routledge.
Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally
sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing
world. Teachers College Press.
Piro, J. S., & Anderson, G. (2018). Intentional
online discussions in teacher education. The Teacher
Educator, 53(2), 167–189.
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme
case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human
Studies, 9(2–3), 219–229.
Potter, J. (2004). Discourse
analysis. In M. A. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook
of data
analysis (pp. 607–624). Sage.
(2012). Discourse
analysis and discursive
psychology. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA
handbook of research methods in psychology: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological and
biological (pp. 111–130). American Psychological Association Press.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2008). Discursive
constructionism. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook
of constructionist
research (pp. 275–293). Guilford Press.
Sacks, H., (1972). On
the analyzability of stories by
children, In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions
in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. Rinehart and Winston.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming
allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of
Sociology, 161–216.
Shin, D. S., & Kang, H. S. (2018). Online
language teacher education: Practices and possibilities. RELC
Journal, 49(3), 369–380.
Sugimoto, A. T., Carter, K., & Stoehr, K. J. (2017). Teaching
“in their best interest”: Preservice teachers’ narratives regarding English
learners. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 67, 179–188.
Suh, S., & Michener, C. J. (2019). The
preparation of linguistically responsive teachers through dialogic online discussion
prompts. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 84, 1–16.
Tracy, K. (2011). What’s
in a name? Stance markers in oral argument about marriage laws. Discourse &
Communication, 5(1), 65–88.
Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing
discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and
text. Sage.
Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Zhang, G., & Klenke, J. (2010). From
stranger to friend: The effect of service learning on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward diverse
populations. Journal of Language and Literacy
Education, 6(2), 34–50. Retrieved
on 5 July 2021 from [URL]
