Cover not available

In:Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development
Edited by Gary G. Fogal and Marjolijn H. Verspoor
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 54] 2020
► pp. 161–182

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 7
The elusive phase shift

Capturing changes in L2 writing development and interaction between the cognitive and social ecosystems

 | Wesleyan University
Published online: 4 June 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54.07hep
Abstract
This chapter explores phase shifts, which occur when dynamic systems enter a period of fluctuation that results in a new stable pattern (Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008). Phase shifts remain elusive in L2 writing research due to a lack sufficiently dense data to detect them and a lack of recognition when they occur. Moreover, the majority of L2 writing research involving phase shift analysis focuses on cognitive factors analyzed with quantitative tools, thus neglecting qualitative methods and the influence of external social factors that may impact change. This chapter examines the definition of phase shifts, reviews relevant complexity theory-inspired quantitative and qualitative methodologies for analyzing L2 writing, and proposes adapting quantitative descriptive research techniques (Ortega & Iberri-Shea, 2005) to investigate social ecosystem variables that may lead to phase shifts.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • What is a phase shift?
  • The interacting social and cognitive ecosystems
    • Cognitive ecosystems
    • Social ecosystems
  • Finding phase shifts
    • Quantitative measurements for investigating the cognitive ecosystem
    • Qualitative analyses in the social ecosystem
  • Finding control parameters using social ecosystem factors
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • References
References (54)
References
Baba, K., & Nitta, R. (2014). Phase transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64(1), 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardy, B. G., Oullier, O., Bootsma, R. J., & Stoffregen, T. A. (2002). Dynamics of human postural transitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 499–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2018). Affirming the context of instructed SLA: The potential of curricular thinking. Language Teaching Research, 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, H., Verspoor, M., & Vahtrick, L. (2015). Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in identical twins. Language Learning, 65(2), 298–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, H., Lowie, W. & de Bot, K. (2016). Input outside the classroom and vocabulary development: A dynamic perspective. In M. Reif & J. Robinson (Eds.), Perspectives on bilingualism (pp. 183–203). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castro, E. (2018). Complex adaptive systems, language advising, and motivation: A longitudinal case study with a Brazilian student of English. System 74, 138–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collentine, J., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 153–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism, 10(1), 7–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2014). Research on language development during study abroad: Methodological consideration and future perspectives. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (p. 313–325). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner individual differences in second language acquisition: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning 59(Supplement 1), 230–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fogal, G. G. (2015). Pedagogical stylistics and concept-based instruction: An investigation into the development of voice in the academic writing of Japanese university students of English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019a). Tracking microgenetic changes in authorial voice development from a complexity theory perspective. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 432–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019b). Investigating variability in L2 development: Extending a complexity theory perspective on L2 writing studies and authorial voice. Applied Linguistics, 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1968). Attitudes and motivation: Their role in second-language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 2(3), 141–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilmore, R. (1981). Catastrophe theory for scientists and engineers: New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 44–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hepford, E. (2017). Dynamic second language development: The interaction of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in a naturalistic learning context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (10257524).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2016). A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting complexity theory into practice. Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 741–756. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kinginger, C. (2008). Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. The Modern Language Journal, 92(Supplement), 1–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1983). The din in the head, input, and the language acquisition device. Foreign Language Annals, 16(1), 41–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Complexity theory: A new way to think. Revista Brasileira de Linguistica Aplicada, 13, 369–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103(Supplement 2019), 61–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Girsai, B. (2008). Form-focused Instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 694–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2015). Variability and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language Learning 65(1), 63–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masgoret, A., & Gardner, R. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and Associates. Language Learning, 53(1), 123–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mijares, L., & Relaño Pastor, A. M. (2011). Language programs at Villababel High: Rethinking ideologies of social inclusion. International Jounral of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(4), 427–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2015). Self-regulation in the evolution of the ideal L2 self: A complex dynamic systems approach to the L2 motivational system. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 164–194). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruhland, R., & van Geert, P. (1998). Jumping into syntax: Transitions in the development of closed class words. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 65–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasaki, M. (2004). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54, 525–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shoaib, A., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Affect in lifelong learning: Exploring L2 motivation as a dynamic process. In P. Benson & D. Nunan (Eds.), Language learners’ stories: Differences and diversity in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 532–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2011). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning 61(1), 37–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, W. A. (2000). Change-point analysis: A powerful new tool for detecting changes. Retrieved from <[URL]> (7 January, 2020).
Thompson, A. S. (2017). Don’t tell me what to do! The anti-ought-to self and language learning motivation. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 67, 38–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, M. & van Geert, P. (2007). Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and Child Development 16, 7–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2011). Variability in DST. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98(1), 3–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Growth dynamics in development. In R. F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. SSLA, 12(3), 287–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., van Geert, P., van Dijk, M., & Schmid, M. S. (2011). How to sections. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 130–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waninge, F., de Bot, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning: Change, stability, and context. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 704–723. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeeman, E. C. (1976). Catastrophe theory. Scientific American, 234(4), 65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zheng, Y. (2016). The complex, dynamic development of L2 lexical use: A longitudinal study on Chinese learners of English. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 56, 40–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Lee, Meng‐Hsun, Eunice Eunhee Jang & Liam Hannah
2025. Automated Diagnostic Feedback vs. Self‐Assessment: Rethinking Feedback Mechanisms on Academic Writing Development. TESOL Quarterly DOI logo
Wang, Huafeng & Chencen Cai
2023. A dynamic systems theory perspective on L2 writing development. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 17:4 ► pp. 872 ff. DOI logo
Fogal, Gary G.
2022. Second language writing from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Teaching 55:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue