Cover not available

In:Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development
Edited by Gary G. Fogal and Marjolijn H. Verspoor
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 54] 2020
► pp. 109–132

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 5
Profiling the dynamic changes of syntactic complexity in L2 academic writing

A multilevel synchrony method

 | The University of Sydney
Published online: 4 June 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54.05ros
Abstract
This chapter investigates changes in the textual manifestation of the syntactic complexity construct in second language (L2) academic writing at the advanced level through linguistically profiling the academic essays of an L2 graduate student in a Master of Education (TESOL) program in Australia. This work explores the dynamic changes of the subconstructs of syntactic complexity at the sentential, clausal, and phrasal levels synchronously through the perspective of complex dynamic systems theory (CDST). To do so, this chapter also introduces a multilevel synchrony method which translates the feature of nestedness of language structure into data mapping, exploration, and profiling. The resulting profile offers visual access, through numerical data and graphs, to the mechanisms that underpin the changes manifest in the language produced by the learner. The findings are then discussed within the framework of CDST and the characteristics of academic writing in English.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Measuring second language performance and development
  • Syntactic complexity in L2 writing
  • Nestedness in complex dynamic systems
  • Multilevel synchrony method
  • The present study
    • Data coding and analysis
  • Results
  • Discussion and implications
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (59)
References
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 17–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhowmik, S. (2016). Agency, identity and ideology in L2 writing: Insights from the EAP classroom. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(2), 275–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 639–668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp. 21–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26(1), 42–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 147–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casanave, C. P. (1994). Language development in students’ journals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 179–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caspi, T., & Lowie, W. (2010). A dynamic perspective on L2 lexical development in academic English. In R. Chacón-Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse, & M. d. M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 41–60). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, H., Verspoor, M. H., & Vahtrick, L. (2015). Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in identical twins. Language Learning, 65(2), 298–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, T. (1976). Measuring written syntactic patterns of second language learners of German. Journal of Educational Research, 69(5), 176–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to second language development (pp. 5–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. H. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Clercq, B., & Housen, A. (2019). The development of morphological complexity: A cross-linguistic study of L2 French and English. Second Language Research, 35(1), 71–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hokamura, M. (2018). The dynamics of complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A longitudinal case study of Japanese learners’ English writing. JALT Journal, 40(1), 23–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Homburg, T. (1984). Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively? TESOL Quarterly, 18, 87–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency: Definitions, measurement and research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerz, E., Wiechmann, D., & Riedel, F. (2017). Implicit learning in the crowd: Investigating the role of awareness in the acquisition of L2 knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 711–734. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khushik, G. A., & Huhta, A. (2019). Investigating syntactic complexity in EFL learners’ writing across common European framework of reference levels A1, A2, and B1. Applied Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 48–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Syntactic complexity, lexical variation and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proficiency level in L2 writing and speaking. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 143–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyle, K. (2016). Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). <[URL]> (7 January 2020).
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine- grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 333–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. Modern Language Journal, 103(Supplement 2019), 61–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, X., & Ai, H. (2015). Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neary-Sundquist, C. A. (2016). Syntactic complexity at multiple proficiency levels of L2 German speech. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, Early View. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Manchón, R. (2012). Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 221–244). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, J. H. (2017). Syntactic complexity as a predictor of second language writing proficiency and writing quality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of noun phrase complextiy in the writing of English for academic purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 48–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penris, W., & Verspoor, M. H. (2017). Academic writing development: A complex, dynamic process. In S. Pfenninger & J. Navracsics (Eds.), Future research directions for Applied Linguistics (pp. 215–242). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perkins, K. (1980). Using objective methods of attained writing proficiency to discriminate among holistic evaluations. TESOL Quarterly, 14(1), 61–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosmawati, R. (2014). Second language developmental dynamics: How dynamic systems theory accounts for issues in second language learning. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 31(1), 66–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Dynamic development and interactions of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in ESL academic writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharma, A. (1980). Syntactic maturity: Assessing writing proficiency in a second language. In R. Silverstein (Ed.), Occassional papers in linguistics (pp. 318–325). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., Crawford, W., & Wetzel, D. (2013). What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 420–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 179–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra- individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behaviour and Development, 25, 340–374.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Vercellotti, M. L. (2017). The development of complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 90–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., Lowie, W., Chan, H., & Vahtrick, L. (2017). Linguistic complexity in second language development: Variability and variation at advanced stages. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures, 14(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 239–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vyatkina, N. (2012). The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 576–598. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Specific syntactic complexity: Developmental profiling of individuals based on an annotated learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 11–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Manoa HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, W., Lu, X., & Weigle, S. C. (2015). Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28(1), 53–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2015). Dynamic development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in multilingual learners’ L1, L2 and L3 writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(2), 298–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, H. J. (2017). Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited: Issues of topics, proficiency, and construct multidimensionality. System, 66, 130–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ahmad, Muhammad, Muhammad Asim Mahmood & Ali Raza Siddique
2025. Determining the L2 academic writing development stage: a corpus-based research on doctoral dissertations. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:1 ► pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Meng‐Hsun, Eunice Eunhee Jang & Liam Hannah
2025. Automated Diagnostic Feedback vs. Self‐Assessment: Rethinking Feedback Mechanisms on Academic Writing Development. TESOL Quarterly DOI logo
Fogal, Gary G.
2022. Second language writing from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Teaching 55:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue