In:Usage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched pedagogy
Edited by Andrea E. Tyler, Lourdes Ortega, Mariko Uno and Hae In Park
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 49] 2018
► pp. 143–164
Chapter 7The impact of prior knowledge on second language grammar practice
Published online: 13 February 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.07alo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.07alo
Abstract
Both the skill building paradigm of language learning known as skills acquisition theory (DeKeyser, 2007) and the family of usage-based theories (N. Ellis, 2015; Tyler, 2012) hold that second language (L2) practice, broadly defined as repeated language usage, is pivotal to the learning of constructions. Intuition would thus suggest that L2 grammar pedagogy must rely on practice activities in the classroom. However, the praxis of practice is less clear. One variable that might moderate the effectiveness of practice is prior knowledge (PK), as it is reasonable to expect that the more learners can rely on PK that is relevant to a new target form, the less intensive or prolonged practice might need to be (Llopis-García, 2010). This chapter investigated the impact of prior knowledge (PK) of a given construction on practice of a new, related construction. It did so by comparing a group of students who, prior to the experiment, could already conjugate the present subjunctive and were familiar with the mood selection in some limited constructional contexts to another group of students who did not have any previous knowledge related to the mood selection in Spanish, and both to a control group. The goal was to ascertain whether PK modulates the benefits that can be obtained from activities that supported extensive practice of Spanish L2 mood selection over 6 weeks totaling 9 hours. Following a pretest/posttest design, results showed that, contrary to expectations, the group with no PK outperformed the group with PK. Results are discussed within the dynamic systems theory paradigm (Verspoor, de Bot, & Lowie, 2011). It is argued that mastery of Spanish L2 mood selection may be subject to processes of cognitive restructuring leading to a variable pathway as evidenced by a U-shaped learning curve.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Practice in theoretical perspective: What is the relationship to L2 development?
- Practice in L2 instructional perspective: A role for prior knowledge?
- Research questions
- Method
- Target item and prior knowledge of the target item
- Participants
- Design
- Instructional package
- Presentation and practice of the target form
- Data collection instruments
- Results
- Results from the multiple-choice task
- Results from the fill-in-the-blank task
- Results from the GJ and correction task
- Discussion and conclusion
Acknowledgements References Appendix
References (50)
Alonso Raya, R., Castañeda Castro, A., Martínez Gila, P., Miquel López, L., Ortega Olivares, J., & Ruiz Campillo, J. P. (2005). Gramática básica del estudiante de español. Madrid: Difusión.
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based gramar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cheng, P. W. (1985). Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition. Psychological Review, 92, 414–423.
de Bot, K., Lowie, W. M., & Verspoor, M. H. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21.
De Bot, K., Lowie, W. M., Thorne, S. L., & Verspoor, M. (2013). Dynamic Systems Theory as a comprehensive theory of second lanaguge development. In M. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez-Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 726–755). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125–151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2007). Introduction: Situating the concept of practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practicing in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 1–18). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
DeKeyser, R., & Criado, R. (2013). Automatization, skill acquisition, and practice in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.
(2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.
(2007). The weak interface, consciousness, and form-focused instruction: Mind the doors. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 17–33). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2009). Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in usage-based and form-focused learning. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 139–158). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
(2011). Implicit and explicit SLA and their interface. In C. Sanz & R. Leow (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA & bilingualism (pp. 35–47). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
(2015). Implicit AND explicit language learning. Their dynamic interface and complexity. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 3–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Ellis, R. (2003). Grammar teaching –practice or consciousness-raising? In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 167–174). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 443–482). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive gramar, Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
(2009). Teaching and testing grammar. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 518–542). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
(2012). On the roles of repetition in language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(2): 195–210.
(2013). Complexity Theory/Dynamic Systems Theory. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 103–106). New York, NY: Routledge.
Lyster, R., & Sato, M. (2013). Skill acquisition theory and the role of practice in L2 development. In M. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez-Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 71–92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Llopis-García, R. (2010). Why cognitive grammar works in the L2 classroom. A case study of mood selection in Spanish. In J. Littlemore & C. Juchem-Grundmann (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics in second language learning and teaching. AILA Review, 23, 72–94.
Madlener, K. (2018). Do findings from artificial language learning generalize to second language classrooms? In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
Marsden, E. (2006). Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning, 56(3), 507–566.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.
Roehr-Brackin, K. (2015). Explicit knowledge about language in L2 learning. A usage-based perspective. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 117–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ruiz Campillo, J. P. (2008). El valor central del subjuntivo: ¿Informatividad o declaratividad? MarcoELE, 7. Retrieved from <[URL]>
(2012). The subjunctive in a single concept: Teaching an operational approach to mood selection in Spanish. In G. Ruiz Fajardo (Ed.), Methodological developments of teaching of Spanish as a second and foreign language (pp. 273–330). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Rousse-Malpat, A., & Verspoor, M. H. (2018). Exposure and practice in a dynamic usage-based approach to classroom instruction. In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 165–179.
Spoelman, M. & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 532–553.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tyler, A. E. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Westport, CT: Ablex.
Verspoor, M. H., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. M. (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development. Methods and techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Verspoor, M. H., Lowie, W. M., & van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in L2 development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231.