In:Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL
Edited by Ana Llinares and Tom Morton
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 47] 2017
► pp. 183–200
Classroom interactional competence in content and language integrated learning
Published online: 16 March 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47.11esc
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47.11esc
Abstract
This chapter problematizes the Classroom Interactional Competence (CIC) of learners and teachers working in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) contexts. Through Multimodal Conversation Analysis (CA), we consider how CIC is enacted in dialogues which focus on both subject content and English. Our analysis reveals that (a) teachers’ deployment of multimodal resources ensures comprehension and self-selection; (b) teachers’ questions and evaluative feedback may play a major role in guiding the students; (c) the scarcity of teacher elicitations aimed at more elaborated learner responses may limit the development of academic discourse; and (d) groupwork may become a privileged environment for students to deploy and develop L2 interactional resources.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Classroom interactional competence
- CIC in a CLIL classroom: An illustrative study
- CIC in teacher-class interaction
- CIC in learner-learner interaction
- Discussion and conclusion
Acknowledgements Note References Appendix
References (36)
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP. First published 1978 as part of Ester N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and Politeness.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: CUP.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Ed.), Talk at Work (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: CUP.
Urmeneta Escobar, C. (2013). Learning to become a CLIL teacher: Teaching, reflection and professional development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 334–353.
Urmeneta Escobar, C., & Evnitskaya, N. (2013). Affording students opportunities for the integrated learning of content and language. a contrastive study on classroom interactional strategies deployed by two CLIL teachers. In J. Arnau (Ed.), Recovering Catalan through school: Challenges and instructional approaches (pp. 158–182). Bristol: Multilingual Matters & Institut d’Estudis Catalans.
(2014). ‘Do you know Actimel?’ The adaptive nature of dialogic teacher-led discussions in the CLIL science classroom: A case study. Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 165–180.
Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91 (1), 798–817.
Goffman, E. (1955). On Face-Work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal of Interpersonal Relations, 18(3), 213–231.
(1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York, NY: Anchor Books. Reprinted by Penguin University Books in 1972.
Hall, J. K., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2011). L2 Interactional competence and development. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 Interactional Competence and Development (pp. 1–15). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–372.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). Having and doing: Learning from a complexity theory perspective. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Reconceptualising learning in applied linguistics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 51–80.
Mann, S., & Walsh, S. (2013). RP or RIP: A critical perspective on reflective practice. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 289–315.
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.
McCarthy, M. J. (2003). Talking back: ‘small’ interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language in Social Interaction, 36(1), 33–63.
Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 323–347.
Pallarés, O. (2010). ‘Think and discuss’: Disseny de tasques per a la construcció de competències discursives a l’aula AICLE de matemàtiques. Un estudi de cas. Unpublished MA thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Pallarés, O., & Petit, C. (2009). The World of Math Through English. ESO Year 2. (Unpublished manuscript).
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language, learning and documenting learning in conversation analytic SLA research. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics (pp. 105–126). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-repair in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The Interactional Architecture of the Second Language Classroom: A conversational analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom, Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3–23.
(2003). Developing interactional awareness in the second language classroom. Language Awareness, 12(2), 124–142.
Walsh, S (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2012). Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 247–266.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Chien, Chih-Chung, Hung-Yu Chan & Huei-Tse Hou
Chan, Jim Yee Him & Steve Walsh
KARAFİL, Burcu & Özlem UYSAL İLBAY
Scherzinger, Luisa & Taiga Brahm
Harumi, Seiko
2023. The facilitative use of learner-initiated translanguaging in Japanese EFL contexts. Applied Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Lo, Yuen Yi, Angel M. Y. Lin & Yiqi Liu
Fürstenberg, Ulla, Tom Morton, Petra Kletzenbauer & Margit Reitbauer
Li, Dongying & Lian Zhang
Ramírez-Verdugo, M. Dolores & Leyre López Castellano
An, Jiangshan, Ernesto Macaro & Ann Childs
2019. Language focused episodes by monolingual teachers in English Medium Instruction science lessons. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7:2 ► pp. 166 ff.
An, Jiangshan, Ernesto Macaro & Ann Childs
2021. Language focused episodes by monolingual teachers in English Medium Instruction science lessons. In Teaching, Learning and Scaffolding in CLIL Science Classrooms [Benjamins Current Topics, 115], ► pp. 17 ff.
Walsh, Steve & Olcay Sert
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
