In:Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL
Edited by Ana Llinares and Tom Morton
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 47] 2017
► pp. 1–16
IntroductionContent and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)
Type of programme or pedagogical model?
Published online: 16 March 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47.01mor
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47.01mor
Article outline
- Why applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL?
- Second language acquisition (SLA) perspective
- Systemic functional linguistics (SFL) perspective
- Discourse analysis perspective
- Sociolinguistic perspectives
- An overview of the sections and chapters
References
References (71)
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Byrnes, H. (2006). What kind of resource is language and why does it matter for advanced language learning? In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 1–28). London: Continuum.
(2012). Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A systemic functional linguistics approach In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 191–218). Berlin: deGruyter Mouton.
Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. J. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269.
Cenoz, J. (2009). Towards multilingual education: Basque educational research from an international perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
(2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8–24.
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262.
Christie, F. (2002). The development of abstraction in adolescence in subject English. In M. Schleppegrell & C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 45–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2009). Communicative competence and the CLIL lesson. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 197–214). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T. (2014). “You can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A Response to Cenoz, Genesee, & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T. (2006). Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 241–267.
Dörnyei, Z., Henry, A., & MacIntyre, P.D. (Eds.). (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Oxford: Routledge.
Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Hornberger, N. H. (Ed.). (2003). Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Hulstijn, J. H. (2013). Is the second language acquisition discipline disintegrating? Language Teaching, 46(4), 511–517.
Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73–94.
Kress, G., et al. (2014). Unit 3.7 Thinking through art: the social body mind map. Learning to Teach Art and Design in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience (pp. 56).
Lin, A. (2015). Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 74–89.
Llinares, A. (2015). Integration in CLIL: A proposal to inform research and successful pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 58–73.
Llinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2015). The role of different tasks in CLIL students’ use of evaluative language. System, 54, 69–79.
Llinares, A., & Lyster, R. (2014). The influence of context on patterns of corrective feedback and learner uptake: A comparison of CLIL and immersion classrooms. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 181–194.
Llinares, A., & Pastrana, A. (2013). CLIL students’ communicative functions across activities and educational levels. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 81–92.
Lorenzo, F. (2007). The sociolinguistics of CLIL: Language planning and language change in 21th century Europe. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 20, 27–38.
Lorenzo, F., & Rodríguez, L. (2014). Onset and expansion of L2 cognitive academic language proficiency in bilingual settings: CALP in CLIL. System, 47, 64–72.
Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mercer, N., & Hodgkinson, S. (Eds.). (2008). Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes. London: Sage.
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K. & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning – mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1): 41–57.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Nicholas, H., & Starks, D. (2014). Language education and applied linguistics: Bridging the two fields. New York, NY: Routledge.
Nikula, T. (2005). English as an object and tool of study in classrooms: Interactional effects and pragmatic implications. Linguistics and Education, 16(1), 27–58.
Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2016). Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Llinares, A. (2013). CLIL classroom discourse: Research from Europe. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 70–100.
Nortier, J., & Svendsen, B.A. (Eds.). (2015). Language, youth and identity in the 21st century: Linguistic practices across urban spaces. Cambridge: CUP.
Paesani, K., Allen, H. W., & Dupuy, B. (2016). A multiliteracies framework for collegiate foreign language teaching. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Ziegler, G. (2007). Doing language, doing science and the sequential organization of the immersion classroom. In Z. Hua, P. Seedhouse, & V. Cook (Eds.), Language learning and teaching as social interaction (pp. 72–87). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pérez-Cañado, M.L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341.
Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2011). Which language competencies benefit from CLIL? An insight into applied linguistics research. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J.M. Sierra, & F. Gallardo del Puerto (Eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts (pp. 129–154). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Sinclair, J.M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: OUP.
Spolsky, B., & Hult, F. M. (2010). The handbook of educational linguistics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Strauss, S., & Feiz, P. (2013). Discourse Analysis: Putting our worlds into words. New York, NY: Routledge.
Swaffar, J., & Arens, K. (2005). Remapping the foreign language curriculum: An approach through multiple literacies. New York, NY: MLA.
Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2012). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.). The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Taguchi, N. (2012). Context, individual differences and pragmatic competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: CUP.
Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A. (2009). CLIL in social science classrooms: Analysis of spoken and written productions. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 215–234). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Cited by (34)
Cited by 34 other publications
Liu, Jiajia Eve
Lo, Alfred W. T.
Onder-Ozdemir, Neslihan & Emilda Roseni
Tai, Kevin W. H. & Li Wei
Vodopija-Krstanović, Irena
Xin, Jieting Jerry, Daniel Fung & Nicole Judith Tavares
Xin, Jieting Jerry & Yuen Yi Lo
Khan, Said Muhammad
Liang, Weijun & Yanjun Wu
2024. A scoping review of the literature on content and language integrated learning assessment. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 12:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Llinares, Ana, Tom Morton & Rachel Whittaker
Morton, Tom & Nashwa Nashaat‐Sobhy
Salvador-Garcia, Celina, Oscar Chiva-Bartoll & David Hortigüela-Alcalá
Teng, Xing San, Janet Hsiao & Yuen Yi Lo
2024. Cognitive processes and strategies of bilingual students when attempting assessments in an L2. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 12:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Lee , Jang Ho, Hansol Lee & Yuen Yi Lo
Morton, Tom
Lo, Yuen Yi & Constant Leung
Martínez Agudo, Juan de Dios
Banegas, Darío Luis
Belskaya, T.V.
van Kampen, Evelyn, Jacobiene Meirink, Wilfried Admiraal & Amanda Berry
Gallardo‐del‐Puerto, Francisco, María Basterrechea & María Martínez‐Adrián
Gierlinger, Erwin Maria
2020. Review of Möller (2017): Language acquisition in CLIL and non-CLIL settings: Learner corpus and experimental evidence on passive constructions. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:2 ► pp. 258 ff.
Lo, Yuen Yi & Daniel Fung
Oxbrow, Gina
Basterrechea, María & Michael J. Leeser
He, Peichang & Angel M. Y. Lin
2019. Co-developing science literacy and foreign language literacy through “Concept + Language Mapping”. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7:2 ► pp. 261 ff.
He, Peichang & Angel M. Y. Lin
2021. Co-developing science literacy and foreign language literacy through “Concept + Language Mapping”. In Teaching, Learning and Scaffolding in CLIL Science Classrooms [Benjamins Current Topics, 115], ► pp. 115 ff.
Lo, Yuen Yi, Wai-mei Lui & Mona Wong
2019. Scaffolding for cognitive and linguistic challenges in CLIL science assessments. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
Lo, Yuen Yi, Wai-mei Lui & Mona Wong
2021. Scaffolding for cognitive and linguistic challenges in CLIL science assessments. In Teaching, Learning and Scaffolding in CLIL Science Classrooms [Benjamins Current Topics, 115], ► pp. 143 ff.
Kampen, Evelyn van, Tessa Mearns, Jacobiene Meirink, Wilfried Admiraal & Amanda Berry
Mearns, Tessa & Rick de Graaff
Mearns, Tessa & Rick de Graaff
2018. Bilingual education and CLIL in the Netherlands. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7:2 ► pp. 122 ff.
Rumlich, Dominik
2018. Current research on CLIL and bilingual education in the Netherlands. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7:2 ► pp. 264 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
