Cover not available

In:Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda
Edited by Masatoshi Sato and Susan Ballinger
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 45] 2016
► pp. 185–208

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

7. Thai EFL learners’ interaction during collaborative writing tasks and its relationship to text quality

 | Concordia University
 | Northern Arizona University
 | Chiang Mai University
Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.08mcd
Second language (L2) writing research has shown that L2 learners routinely scaffold each other when working together to co-construct written texts. The analysis of peer interaction has focused largely on the occurrence of language-related episodes (LREs), with fewer studies documenting how learners discuss other elements of written texts, such as their content or organization (Elola & Oskoz 2010; Storch 2005; Storch & Wigglesworth 2007; Wigglesworth & Storch 2009), or establishing a link between student interaction and text quality. This chapter describes the interaction that occurred when Thai EFL students worked in pairs to write summary and problem/solution paragraphs and explores whether their discussions were related to text quality in the form of analytic ratings. The results indicated that problem/solution collaborative writing tasks showed a positive relationship between student talk and text quality and elicited significantly more discussion of content, organization, and language than summary tasks. Implications are discussed in terms of pedagogical considerations for the use of collaborative writing tasks in EFL contexts.
References (61)
Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 29–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M.P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M.P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp.91–116). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basterrechea, M. & García Mayo, M.P. (2013). Language-related episodes during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 25–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosher, S. (1998). The composing processes of three Southeast Asian writers at the post-secondary level: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 7, 205–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brooks, L., & Swain, M. (2009). Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation of and response to expertise. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 58–89). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning 39, 81–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning and Technology, 14(3), 51–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Dobao, A., & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41, 365–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortune, A. (2005). Learners’ use of metalanguage in collaborative form-focused L2 output tasks. Language Awareness, 14, 21–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fujii, A., Zeigler, N., & Mackey, A. (2016). Learner-learner interaction and metacognitive instruction in the EFL classroom. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 63–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, G., & Lam, S. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38, 371–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2011). Learning to write: Issues in theory, research, and pedagogy. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 183–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002). Collaborative writing in L2: The effect of group interaction on text quality. In S. Randsdell & M.-L. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 169–188). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–47). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeser, M.J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, J., & Sadler, R. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lundstrum, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malmquist, A. (2005). How does group discussion in reconstruction tasks affect written language output? Language Awareness, 14, 128–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K., Crawford, W., De Vleeschauwer, J. (2013). Collaborative and individual writing in a Thai university context . Paper presented at the 24th European Second Language Association conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
. (2014). Summary writing in a Thai EFL university context. Journal of Second Language Writing, 24, 20–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Min, H. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neumann, H., & McDonough, K. (2014). Exploring the relationships among student preferences, prewriting tasks, and text quality in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15, 14–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 84–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niu, R. (2009). Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18, 384–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raimes, A. (1987). Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college student writers. Language Learning 37, 439–469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 9, 259–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 611–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 591–626. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sato, M. Viveros, P. (2016). Interaction of collaboration? Group dynamics in the foreign language classroom. In M. Sato & Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 91–112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, V.M, & de la Fuente, M.J. (2008). What’s the problem? L2 learners’ use of the L1 during consciousness-raising form-focused tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 100–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 286–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, L. (1998). Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL students’ compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 319–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2002a). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002b). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 305–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2010). Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14, 355–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17, 31–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: The effects of collaboration. In M.P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp.157–177). Clevedon, UK; Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Languaging, agency, and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, (2010). Talking-it-through: Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research 4, 251–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 99–118). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweigart, W. (1991). Classroom talk, knowledge development, and writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 469–496.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Weijen, D., van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsam, G., & Sanders, T. (2009). L1 use during L2 writing: An empirical study of a complex phenomenon. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 235–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, E., & Toth, P. (2013). Building explicit L2 Spanish knowledge through guided induction in small group and whole class interaction. In K. McDonough, & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 89–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26, 445–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (29)

Cited by 29 other publications

Bllaca, Nuhi & Izaskun Villarreal
2025. Exploring patterns of interaction, LREs and writing performance of adolescent EFL learners. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Hsiu-Chen
2025. The effect of collaborative prewriting on L2 collaborative writing production and individual L2 writing development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:1 ► pp. 499 ff. DOI logo
Michel, Marije, Iryna Bazhutkina, Niklas Abel & Carola Strobl
2025. Collaborative writing based on generative AI models: Revision and deliberation processes in German as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing 67 ► pp. 101185 ff. DOI logo
Rong, Xin & Andrea Révész
2025. The temporal distribution of cognitive writing processes and its interaction with task complexity during computer-assisted collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Abad, José Vicente & María Fernanda Arango Salazar
2024. Escritura colaborativa en educación superior y su aporte a la formación de maestros investigadores. Forma y Función 37:1 DOI logo
Carhill-Poza, Avary, Lili Tian & Jesse Rubio
2024. The affordances of language choice in negotiation of oral peer feedback on L2 writing. Writing & Pedagogy 15:3 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Li, Mimi & Meixiu Zhang
2023. Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms: A research agenda. Language Teaching 56:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Payant, Caroline & Derek Reagan
2023. Engaging lower proficiency learners of Spanish in collaborative writing tasks. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 36:2 ► pp. 643 ff. DOI logo
Sang, Zilin & Weicheng Zou
2023. The Effect of Joint Production on the Accuracy and Complexity of Second Language Writing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:2 ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Tajabadi, Azar, Moussa Ahmadian, Hamidreza Dowlatabadi & Hooshang Yazdani
2023. EFL learners’ peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research 27:3 ► pp. 689 ff. DOI logo
Tri, Pham Manh, Nguyen Thi Thanh Van & Cao Thi Xuan Tu
2023. EFL Students’ Perceptions and Challenges of Computer-Mediated Collaborative Writing in Academic Writing Courses at Van Lang University. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Asia Association of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (AsiaCALL 2022) [Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 744], ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Van, Cong Hoang Truong & Thi Thanh Mai Tran
2023. VLU EFL Students’ Perceptions Toward the Use of Collaborative Writing. International Journal of TESOL & Education 3:3 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Meixiu & Mimi Li
2023. Collaborative writing in face-to-face and computer-mediated L2 settings. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Horii, Sachiko Yokoi
2022. Material Mediation in L2 Writing Activities in a College Russian as a Foreign Language Classroom in Japan. In New Perspectives on Material Mediation in Language Learner Pedagogy [Educational Linguistics, 56], ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Toth, Paul D. & Yohana Gil‐Berrio
2022. Exploring “Intersubjectivity Negotiation Episodes” and “Language Related Episodes” in Second‐Language Peer Interaction. Language Learning 72:S1 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Meixiu & William J. Crawford
2022. Attention to form in collaborative writing: language-related episodes in L1 and L2 use conditions. Language Awareness 31:2 ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Li, Hui Helen, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Haoran Xie
2021. Effects of structured small-group student talk as collaborative prewriting discussions on Chinese university EFL students’ individual writing: A quasi-experimental study. PLOS ONE 16:5 ► pp. e0251569 ff. DOI logo
Salem Aldossary, Khaled
2021. The Impact of Collaborative Writing on EFL Learners’ Writing Development: A Longitudinal Classroom-Based Study in Saudi Arabia. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Zhang, Meixiu
2021. Understanding L1 and L2 interaction in collaborative writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis. Language Teaching Research 25:3 ► pp. 338 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Meixiu
2022. A re-examination of pair dynamics and L2 learning opportunities in collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research 26:1 ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Meixiu
2024. Collaborative writing in an EFL secondary setting: the role of task complexity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Li, Hui Helen, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Judy M. Parr
2020. Small-Group Student Talk Before Individual Writing in Tertiary English Writing Classrooms in China: Nature and Insights. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
McDonough, Kim & William J. Crawford
2020. Identifying effective writing tasks for use in EFL write-to-learn language contexts. The Language Learning Journal 48:4 ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Mohammadzadeh, Aysheh, Touran Ahour, Mahnaz Saeidi & María Consuelo Sáiz Manzanares
2020. A Sociocultural Perspective on Second Language Writing: The Effect of Symmetrical versus Asymmetrical Scaffolding on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity and Their Attitudes. Education Research International 2020 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sippel, Lieselotte
2020. German Learners' Beliefs About Peer Interaction and Peer Feedback. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 53:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
McDonough, Kim, Jindarat De Vleeschauwer & William J. Crawford
2019. Exploring the benefits of collaborative prewriting in a Thai EFL context. Language Teaching Research 23:6 ► pp. 685 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen
2019. Methodological strengths, challenges, and joys of classroom-based quasi-experimental research. In Doing SLA Research with Implications for the Classroom [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 52], ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Philp, Jenefer
2016. New pathways in researching interaction. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
McDonough, Kim
2015. Perceived benefits and challenges with the use of collaborative tasks in EFL contexts. In Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 8], ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue