In:Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda
Edited by Masatoshi Sato and Susan Ballinger
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 45] 2016
► pp. 33–61
1. Peer interaction and learning
A focus on the silent learner
Published online: 10 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.02fer
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.02fer
This chapter investigated whether all learners benefitted from the lexical language-related episodes (LREs) produced in small group interaction, even when acting as silent observers of their peers’ collaborative work. Using a pretest-posttest design, evidence was obtained confirming that silent learners did benefit from LREs. In fact, they were almost as likely to gain new knowledge as those learners who triggered the episodes. These findings indicate that silent learners were as actively engaged with the vocabulary being discussed in the LREs as their speaking peers. Other factors, such as the length of the episode and the amount of negotiation and repetition, seemed to have a stronger influence on learning than the actual opportunities to speak. The pedagogical implications of these findings are discussed.
References (48)
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M.P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M.P. Garca Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Allwright, R. (1980). Turns, topics and tasks: Patterns of participation in language teaching and learning. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 165–187). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314–342.
Choi, H., & Iwashita, N. (2016). Interactional behaviours of low-proficiency learners in small group work. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 113–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 44, 449–491.
Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.
. (2014a). Attention to form in collaborative writing tasks: Comparing pair and small group interaction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 14, 158–187.
. (2014b). Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work. Language Teaching Research.
Fernández Dobao, A., & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41, 365–378.
Foster, P., & Ohta, A. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402–430.
García Mayo, M.P. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 156–175.
Guerrero, M.C.M. de (2005). Inner speech - L2: Thinking words in a second language. New York, NY: Springer.
Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 114–130.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211–234.
Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Smith, M. (2002). Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 485–507.
Lasito, & Storch, N. (2013). Comparing pair and small group interactions on oral tasks. RELC Journal, 44, 361–375.
Leeser, M.J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81.
Ohta, A.S. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Philp, J., & Iwashita, N. (2013). Talking, tuning in and noticing: Exploring the benefits of output in task-based peer interaction. Language Awareness, 22, 353–370.
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2016). A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2012). Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-methodology examination. Language Awareness, 21, 157–179.
. (2016). Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Saville-Troike, M. (1988). Private speech: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the ‘silent’ period. Child Language, 15, 567–590.
Shekary, M., & Tahririan, M. (2006). Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 557–573.
Storch, N. (2001a). Comparing ESL learners’ attention to grammar on three different classroom tasks. RELC Journal, 32, 104–124.
. (2001b). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5, 29–53.
. (2004). Using activity theory to explain differences in patterns of dyadic interactions in an ESL class. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 457–480.
. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95–114.
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17, 31–48.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303–334.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). New York, NY: Continuum.
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2011). Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337.
. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). London: Longman.
. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285–304.
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). Feedback and writing development through collaboration: A socio-cultural approach. In R. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 69–100). Boston, MA: de Gruyter Mouton.
Yilmaz, Y. (2011). Task effects on focus on form in synchronous computer-mediated communication. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 115–132.
Young, A., & Tedick, D.J. (2016). Collaborative dialogue in a two-way Spanish/English immersion classroom: Does heterogeneous grouping promote peer linguistic scaffolding? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 135–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (38)
Cited by 38 other publications
Hidden, Marie-Odile
Kessler, Matt
Peng, Carrie Xin & Neomy Storch
Shoecraft, Kelly
Suzuki, Noriko
Aksoy-Pekacar, Kadriye
Añana, Ella Love A., Jairah Jean M. Javier & Jonel Mark D. Sarno
Kirchhoff, Natalie & Raúl Dávila-Romero
Kirchhoff, Natalie & Raúl Dávila-Romero
Pais Marden, Mariolina & Jan Herrington
Saeid, Sana Fatah
赵, 昆鹏
Almalki, Hanan & Neomy Storch
2023. Online collaborative L2 writing. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 130 ff.
Pleines, Christine & Qian Kan
Storch, Neomy
Tajabadi, Azar, Moussa Ahmadian, Hamidreza Dowlatabadi & Hooshang Yazdani
Tosun, Sibel & Nuray Alagözlü
Tavakol, Mahbube, Mansoor Tavakoli & Saeed Ketabi
Castañeda, Daniel A.
Feng, Ruiling, Kyunghee Pyun, Wenzhong Zhang & Rafael Márquez Flores
Peace, Meghann M.
Sato, Masatoshi & Claudia Dussuel Lam
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2020. Child EFL grammar learning through a collaborative writing
task. In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55], ► pp. 19 ff.
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. Effects of proficiency and collaborative work on child EFL individual dictogloss writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 246 ff.
Fernández-Dobao, Ana
2020. Exploring interaction between heritage and second language
learners in the Spanish language classroom. In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55], ► pp. 91 ff.
Kim, Youn-hee
Storch, Neomy & Ali Alshuraidah
2020. Languaging when providing and processing peer feedback. In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55], ► pp. 111 ff.
Swain, Merrill & Yuko Watanabe
Sydorenko, Tetyana, John Hellermann, Steven L. Thorne & Vanessa Howe
Bernstein, Katie A.
Loewen, Shawn & Masatoshi Sato
Peeters, Ward
Peeters, Ward
Sato, Masatoshi
Chen, Wenxue
Philp, Jenefer
2016. New pathways in researching interaction. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 377 ff.
Philp, Jenefer & Susan Duchesne
Young, Amy I. & Diane J. Tedick
2016. 5. Collaborative dialogue in a two-way Spanish/English immersion classroom. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 135 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
