In:Interlanguage: Forty years later
Edited by ZhaoHong Han and Elaine Tarone
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 39] 2014
► pp. 127–146
Chapter 6. Documenting interlanguage development
Published online: 30 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.08ch6
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.08ch6
This chapter illustrates Selinker’s (1972) claim that interlanguage is a linguistic system in its own right by examining research in three different areas of L2 development: interlanguage temporality, L2 pragmatics, and conventional expressions. The chapter begins with a review of functional approaches to interlanguage analysis. It then reviews a longitudinal study of interlanguage temporality illustrating the development of form-meaning mappings as learners acquire temporal expression in L2 English. The importance of interlanguage development in the pragmatics of L2 learners is emphasized in the next section which demonstrates that the interpretation of learner forms in conversation is dependent on the inventory of available linguistic devices. The chapter closes by considering the role of interlanguage grammar in the production of formulaic expressions.
References (33)
Andersen, R.W. (1984). The one to one principle of interlanguage construction.
Language Learning
, 34, 77–95.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Reverse-order reports and the acquisition of tense: Beyond the principle of chronological order.
Language Learning
, 44, 243–282.
(1997). Another piece of the puzzle: The emergence of the present perfect.
Language Learning
, 47, 375–422.
(1999). The interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics.
Language Learning
, 49, 677–713.
(2000).
Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use
. Oxford: Blackwell.
(2004a). Monopolizing the future: How the go-future breaks into will’s territory and what it tells us about SLA.
EuroSLA Yearbook
, 4 177–201.
(2004b). The emergence of grammaticalized future expression in longitudinal production data. In M. Overstreet, S. Rott, B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.)
Form and Meaning in Second Language Acquisition
(pp. 115–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2005). The future of desire: Lexical futures and modality in L2 English future expression. In L. Dekydtspotter & R. Sprouse (Eds.),
7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition,
(pp. 1–12). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. <[URL]>
(2006). On the role of formulas in the acquisition of L2 pragmatics. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A.S. Omar (Eds.),
Pragmatics and Language Learning,
(Vol. 11, pp. 1–28). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
(2009). Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics.
Language Learning
, 59, 755–795.
(2012). Pragmatic variation and conventional expressions. In J. C. Félix-Brasdefer & D. Koike (Eds.),
Pragmatic Variation in First and Second Language Contexts: Methodological Issues
(pp. 141–173). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Salsbury, T. (2004). The organization of turns in the disagreements of L2 learners: A longitudinal perspective. In D. Boxer & A.D. Cohen (Eds.),
Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning
(pp. 199–227)
. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cooreman, A., & Kilborn, K. (1991). Functionalist linguistics: Discourse structure and language processing in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.),
Cross Currents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory
(pp. 195–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dahl, Ö. (1984). Temporal distance: Remoteness distinctions in tense aspect systems. In B. Butterworth, B. Comrie, & Ö. Dahl (Eds.),
Explanations for Language Universals
(pp. 105 122). Berlin: Mouton.
Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (1995).
The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eisenstein, M., & Bodman, J. W.(1986). ‘I very appreciate’: Expressions of gratitude by native and non-native speakers of American English.
Applied Linguistics
, 7 167–185.
Haegeman, L. (1989).
Be Going to and Will: A pragmatic account.
Journal of Linguistics
, 25, 291–317.
Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.),
Pragmatics in Language Teaching
(pp. 33–60). Cambridge: CUP.
Klein, W. (1986).
Second Language Acquisition
. (Rev. ed., Bohuslaw Jankowski, Trans.) Cambridge: CUP. (Original work published 1984)
(1995). The acquisition of English. In R. Dietrich, W. Klein, & C. Noyau (Eds.),
The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language
(pp. 31 70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M., & Sato, C.J. (1984). Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A.P.R. Howatt (Eds.),
Interlanguage
(pp. 253 279). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Meisel, J.M. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural language acquisition. In C.W. Pfaff (Ed.),
First and Second Language Acquisition Processes
(pp. 206–224). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F.H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J.C. Richards & R.W. Schmidt (Eds.),
Language and Communication
(pp. 191–226). London: Longman.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.),
Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis
(pp. 57–101). Cambridge: CUP.
Salsbury, T., & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). “I know your mean, but I don’t think so” Disagreements in L2 English. In L. Bouton (Ed.),
Pragmatics and Language Learning
(Vol. 10) (pp. 131–151). Urbana-Champaign IL: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.
(2000). Oppositional talk and the acquisition of modality in L2 English. In B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M.E. Anderson, C.A. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds.),
Social and Cognitive Factors in Second Language Acquisition: Selected Proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum
(pp. 57–76). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation and the acquisition of communicative competence. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.),
Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition
(pp. 137–174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Wu, Xiaoling
Schramm, Andreas, Verena Haser, Michael C. Mensink, Jonas Reifenrath & Parinaz Kassemi
Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro & Cristina Suárez-Gómez
Morbiato, Anna
Neumann, Farrah & Matthew Kanwit
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
2018. Concept-oriented analysis. In Critical Reflections on Data in Second Language Acquisition [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 51], ► pp. 171 ff.
WERNER, VALENTIN & ROBERT FUCHS
Schramm, Andreas & Michael C. Mensink
2016. Processing of aspectual meanings by non-native and native English speakers during narrative comprehension. In New Approaches to English Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 177], ► pp. 251 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
