In:Interlanguage: Forty years later
Edited by ZhaoHong Han and Elaine Tarone
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 39] 2014
► pp. 7–26
Chapter 1. Enduring questions from the Interlanguage Hypothesis
Published online: 30 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.03ch1
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.03ch1
This chapter claims that the Interlanguage Hypothesis is best understood, not as a theory of second language acquisition (SLA), but as a set of questions that motivate divergent answers and research programs. Selinker’s (1972) basic question is whether there is a linguistic system that underlies the output of second language learners. Related questions that continue to stimulate research focus on: the relationship between first and second language acquisition, whether and how the linguistic systems formed in SLA fossilize, and whether and how learners’ interlanguage use varies in different social situations. The chapter also considers related questions not addressed in Selinker (1972): the impact of alphabetic print literacy on interlanguage development, and whether interlanguages are features of speech communities.
References (61)
Bayley, R., & Preston, D. (Eds.) (1996).
Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bayley, R., & Tarone, E. (2011). Variationist perspectives. In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.),
Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
(pp. 41–56). New York, NY: Routledge.
Beebe, L. (1980). Sociolinguistic variation and style shifting in second language acquisition.
Language Learning
, 30, 433–447.
Beebe, L., & Zuengler, J. (1983). Accommodation theory: An explanation for style shifting in second language dialects. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.).
Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition
(pp. 195–213). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Bigelow, M., DelMas, R., Hansen, K., & Tarone, E. (2006). Literacy and the processing of oral recasts in SLA,
TESOL Quarterly
, 40(4), 665–689.
Birdsong, D. (Ed.). (1999).
Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis
. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. In M. Gullberg & P. Indefrey (Eds.),
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Second Language Acquisition
. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity.
Language Learning
, 33, 1–17.
Cook, V.J. (1991). The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence.
Second Language Research
, 7(2), 103–117.
(1996). Competence and multi-competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer & J. Williams (Eds.),
Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition
(pp. 57–69). Cambridge: CUP.
Corder, S.P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors.
International Review of Applied Linguistics
, 5, 160–170.
Dickerson, L. (1975). The learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable rules.
TESOL Quarterly
, 9, 401–407.
Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998).
Focus-on-form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition
. Cambridge: CUP.
Eckman, F., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (Eds.). (1984).
Universals of Second Language Acquisition
. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Ellis, N. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning.
Language Learning
, 48, 631–664.
Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge?
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
, 24, 223–236.
(2006). Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge.
Applied Linguistics
, 27, 431–463.
Eubank, L. (Ed.). (1991).
Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the Second Language
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fasold, R., & Preston, D. (2007). The psycholinguistic unity of inherent variability: Old Occam whips out his razor. In R. Bayley & C. Lucas(Eds),
Sociolinguistic Variation: Theory, Methods, and Applications
(pp. 45–69). Cambridge: CUP.
Fotos, S., & Nassaji, H. (2006).
Form-focused Instruction and Teacher Education: Studies in Honour of Rod Ellis
. Oxford,: OUP.
Freeman, D., & Johnson, D. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education.
TESOL Quarterly
, 32, 397–418.
Gass, S. (1989). Language universals and second language acquisition.
Language Learning
, 39, 497–534.
Gatbonton, D. (1975).
Systematic Variations in Second Language Speech: A Sociolinguistic Study
. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.
Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition.
Psychological Science
, 14, 31–38.
Han, Z.-H. (2004).
Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition
. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Han, Z.-H., & Odlin, T. (Eds.). (2006).
Studies of Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition
. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Krashen, S. (1976). Formal and informal environments in language learning and language acquisition.
TESOL Quarterly
, 10, 157–168.
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.),
Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective
(pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
MacWhinney, B. (2008). A unified model. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.),
Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition
(pp. 341–371). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2012). The logic of the unified model. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.),
The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
(pp. 211–227). New York, NY: Routledge.
Paradis, M. (2004).
A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. (2008).
Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition
. New York, NY: Routledge.
Schachter, J. (1996). Maturation and the issue of universal grammar in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.),
Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
(pp. 159–194). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schmidt, R.W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.),
Cognition and Second Language Instruction
. Cambridge: CUP.
Selinker, L. 1972. Interlanguage.
IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
, 10, 209–241.
Selinker, L., & Douglas, D. (1985). Wrestling with 'context' in interlanguage theory.
Applied Linguistics
, 6, 190–204.
Selinker, L., & Gass, S. (1984).
Workbook in Second Language Acquisition
. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Selinker, L., & Lakshmanan, U. (1992). Language transfer and fossilization: The ‘multiple effects principle’. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.),
Language Transfer in Language Learning, 2nd ed
. (pp. 47–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Selinker, L, Swain, M., & Dumas, G. (1975). The interlanguage hypothesis extended to children.
Language Learning
, 25, 139–152.
Sharwood Smith, M., & Truscott, J. (2005). Stages or continua in second language acquisition: A MOGUL solution.
Applied Linguistics
, 2, 219–240.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.)
Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson
(pp. 125–144).
Oxford: OUP.
Tarone, E., & Liu, G-Q. (1995). Situational context, variation and SLA theory. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.),
Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson
(pp. 107–124). Oxford: OUP.
Tarone, E., Swierzbin, B., & Bigelow, M. (2006). The impact of literacy level on features of interlanguage in oral narratives.
Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata,
VI(3), 65–77. (Thomas Baldwin & Larry Selinker, Eds.) Special issue on
“Interlanguage: Current thought and Practices”
.
Ullman, M.T. (2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model.
Cognition 92
: 231–270.
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (2007). Introduction: The nature of theories. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.),
Theories in Second Language Acquisition
(pp. 1–16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Young, R., & Bayley, R. (1996). VARBRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In R. Bayley & D. Preston (Eds.),
Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation
(pp. 253–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Liu, Mengying & Elaine Tarone
Ryan, Jonathon, Pauline Foster, Anthea Fester, Yi Wang, Jenny Field, Celine Kearney & Jia Rong Yap
Nielsen, Jacob Kurt
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
