In:Technology in Interlanguage Pragmatics Research and Teaching
Edited by Naoko Taguchi and Julie M. Sykes
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 36] 2013
► pp. 19–41
Chapter 2. Comprehension of conversational implicature
What response times tell us
Published online: 20 June 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.36.03tag
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.36.03tag
Computer technology has created new options for interlanguage pragmatics analysis. Researchers can now quickly test second language (L2) learner’s efficiency in processing pragmatic meaning without relying on paper-and-pencil methods. This chapter presents examples of such technology-enhanced analysis in the comprehension of conversational implicature among learners of L2 English. Previous research has examined implicature comprehension by using paper-and-pencil tests that require learners to read or listen to conversations and identify speakers’ implied intentions by responding to multiple-choice questions. My studies have expanded the scope of this practice by introducing a computer-based listening test that measures both accuracy and speed (response times) in comprehension. These two attributes have been measured to illustrate different processing loads encoded in implicature as well as different stages of development in L2 learners’ ability to comprehend implicature. This chapter presents two studies which exemplify the uses of response time data.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Díaz Ferrero, Ana María, Isa Vitória Severino & Rafael Porlán Moreno
Schulze, Cornelia, David Buttelmann, Liqi Zhu & Henrik Saalbach
Yang, He
Ifantidou, Elly
González-Lloret, Marta
González-Lloret, Marta
Glaser, Karen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
