In:Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In honor of James Emil Flege
Edited by Ocke-Schwen Bohn and Murray J. Munro
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 17] 2007
► pp. 349–365
The graphical basis of phones and phonemes
Published online: 17 January 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.29por
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.29por
The notion of phonetic segment, phone and phoneme are closely related and all are intuitively appealing. At least one of them seems like the right description for speech. But all those who report these intuitions happen to be people who learned to write using a phonetic alphabet in early childhood. Speech is difficult to attend to because of its rapidity, its variability, and the invisibility of the most important body movements, so some cognitive scaffolding for attending to speech accurately is required. The technology of alphabetic writing was modified for this purpose about a hundred years ago. Our alphabet experience accounts for the persuasiveness of our intuitions but segments (phonemic or phonetic) are probably not important units in the psychological representation of language.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
DICKIE, CATHERINE, MITSUHIKO OTA & ANN CLARK
Chuang, Hui-Kai, R. Malatesha Joshi & L. Quentin Dixon
Kluender, K.R. & J.M. Alexander
Kluender, Keith R. & Michael Kiefte
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
