Article published In: Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 3:2 (2017) ► pp.101–121
Monument as semiotic landscape
The contested historiography of a national tragedy
Published online: 19 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.3.2.01hue
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.3.2.01hue
Abstract
As semiotic spaces, monuments convey messages through multiple information design modes, including language, materiality and
emplacement. As research on semiotic landscape has pointed out (e.g., Shohamy, E. and Waksman, S. (2009). Linguistic landscape as an ecological arena: Modalities, meanings, negotiations, education. In E. Shohamy and D. Gorter, (Eds.). pp. 313–331. , Abousnnouga, G. and Machin, D. (2010). War monuments and the changing discourses of nation and soldiery. In A. Jaworski and C. Thurlow (Eds), pp. 219–239., Train, R. W. (2016). Connecting visual presents to archival pasts in multilingual California: Towards historical depth in Linguistic Landscape. Linguistic Landscape 2 (3), 223–246. ), these messages are often contested in nature and convey competing discourses inherent in the spaces they occupy.
This paper explores those competing discourses manifested in a monument dedicated to the 1976 student protest and violent
suppression of it by the Thai military and right-wing paramilitary groups. Working within a production of space framework (Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. English translation by D. Nicholson-Smith. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.) and drawing on insights from the grammar of visual design ( (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Second Edition. London: Routledge. ) and nexus analysis (Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. New York: Routledge. ), the paper attempts to show how these contested discourses are reflected in the monument’s
historiography as conceived, in its physical appearance and emplacement, and as it is experienced today. The analysis is based on
photographic data of the monument and its immediate physical context, published accounts of the events of October 6, and
interviews with survivors, commemoration planners, and the monument’s designer.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 3.Monuments and the semiotics of space
- 4.Conceived space – monument as tale of multiple narratives
- 4.1Perceived space – monument as physical object
- 5.Lived space as contested histories / narratives / social memories
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (34)
Abousnnouga, G. and Machin, D. (2010). War monuments and the changing discourses of nation and soldiery. In A. Jaworski and C. Thurlow (Eds), pp. 219–239.
Ben-Rafael, E. (2016).
Introduction
. Linguistic Landscape 2 (3). 207–210.
Blomaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscape: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Committee for the Construction of the Thammasat History of Democracy Monument (2000), eds. Six October 1996 Monument. Bangkok: Thammasat University
Garvin, R. T. (2016). Multiple ‘ways of telling’ in the LL: Marking the WWII Japanese American Internment Camp at Rohwer, Arkansas, USA. Paper presented at the Eighth Linguistic Landscape Workshop at Liverpool University, April.
Guilat, Y. and Espinosa-Ramirez, A. B. (2016). The Historical Memory Law and its role in redesigning semiotic cityscapes in Spain: A case study from Granada. Linguistic Landscape 2 (3), 247–274.
Handley, P. M. (2006). The King Never Smiles: A Biography of Thailand’s Bhumibol Adulyadej. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C. Eds. (2010). Semiotic Landscape: Language, Image, Space. London and New York: Continuum.
Kongkirati, P. (2012). Thailand: The cultural politics of student resistance. In M. L. Weiss and E. Aspinall (Eds.). pp. 234–241.
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
Laothammatat, A. (2000). Building the October Heroes Monument: It’s Historical Importance [in Thai]. In Committee for the Construction of the Thammasat History of Democracy Monument, eds. p. 29.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. English translation by D. Nicholson-Smith. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Lim, E. (n.d.). Pridi Banomyong: father of Thai democracy. [URL], retrieved February 8, 2017.
Lou, J. J. (2016). The Linguistic Landscape of Chinatown: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. Bristol, Buffalo and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Malinowski, D. (2015). Opening spaces of learning in the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape: An International Journal 1 (1–2), 93–113.
Noobanjong, K. (2012). The Rajadamnoen Avenue: Contesting urban meanings and political memories. Journal of Architectural / Planning Research and Studies 9 (2), 15–37.
Rojanaphruk, R. (2016, October 5). The will to remember: Survivors recount 1976 Thammasat massacre 40 years later. Khao Sod English: An on-line English language news outlet, Retrieved from [URL], February 8, 2017:
Satha-Anand, C. (2006). The silence of the bullet monument: Violence and “truth” management, Dunsun-nyor 1948, and Kru-Ze 2004. Critical Asian Studies 38. (1), 11–37.
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. New York: Routledge.
Shohamy, E., E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), 2010). Linguistic Landscape in the City. Bristol: Multingual Matters.
Shohamy, E. and Gorter, D., eds. (2009). Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York and London: Routledge.
Shohamy, E. and Waksman, S. (2009). Linguistic landscape as an ecological arena: Modalities, meanings, negotiations, education. In E. Shohamy and D. Gorter, (Eds.). pp. 313–331.
Tanabe, S. and C. F. Keyes, Eds. (2002). Cultural Crisis and Social Memory: Modern Identity in Thailand and Laos. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Train, R. W. (2016). Connecting visual presents to archival pasts in multilingual California: Towards historical depth in Linguistic Landscape. Linguistic Landscape 2 (3), 223–246.
Trumper-Hecht, N. (2010). Linguistic landscape in mixed cities in Israel from the perspective of ‘walkers’: The case of Arabic. InE. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael & M. Barni (Eds). pp. 235–251.
(2006). Towards a semiotic of typography. Information Design Journal + Document Design 141, 139–155.
Weiss, M. L. and E. Aspinall, Eds. (2012). Student Activism in Asia: Between Protest and Powerlessness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Winichakul, T. (2002). Remembering / silencing the traumatic past: The ambivalent memories of the October 1976 massacre in Bangkok. In S. Tanabe and C. Keyes, Eds., pp. 243–283.
(2001). “We Do Not Forget the 6 October” The 1996 Commemoration of the October 1976 Massacre in Bangkok. Paper presented at the workshop on “Imagining the Past, Remembering the Future,” sponsored by the Japan Foundation and the University of the Philippines, Cebu, March 8–10, 15 pages.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Ayae, Adeelah & Kristof Savski
Buchstaller, Isabelle, Carolin Schneider & Seraphim Alvanides
2023. Towards a taxonomy of arguments for and against street renaming. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 9:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Hastie, Brianne, Martha Augoustinos & Kellie Elovalis
Kosatica, Maida
Malinowski, David, Hiram H. Maxim & Sébastien Dubreil
Bellentani, Federico
Jocuns, Andrew
Phan, Nhan
2021. Memories and semiotic resources in place-making. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 7:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Starks, Donna & Nhan Phan
Vajta, Katharina
Vajta, Katharina
Vajta, Katharina, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba, S. Prévost & A. Steuckardt
Roos, Jana & Howard Nicholas
Sebastian, Paul
2019. Signs of resistance in the Asturian linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 5:3 ► pp. 302 ff.
Bendl, Christian
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
