Article published In: 10th Anniversary Issue: Engaging with LL futures
Edited by Robert Blackwood and Elana Shohamy
[Linguistic Landscape 10:4] 2024
► pp. 400–424
Artificial Intelligence and Linguistic Landscape research
Affordances, challenges & considerations
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Columbia University.
Published online: 25 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.24011.vos
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.24011.vos
Abstract
This article explores applications of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in Linguistic Landscape research.
Traditionally, LL research has relied on manual data collection and analysis, often involving photographs of public signage,
advertisements, and other visual language displays. However, this manual approach can present challenges, including time-consuming
data collection, inconsistent data quality, and potential researcher bias. Two AI technologies in particular hold promise for
addressing these challenges in LL research: computer vision (CV) and large language models (LLMs). CV automates the identification
and extraction of text from images, improving data accuracy and enabling large-scale image analysis. LLMs, based on natural
language processing, can detect, translate, and interpret multilingual text. This article explores the affordances and challenges
of using AI technologies in LL research and discusses methods to improve data collection, enhance accuracy, and support the
analysis of multilingual environments. It also raises ethical issues and limitations of the technologies.
Sammanfattning
Denna artikel utforskar tillämpningar av artificiella intelligens (AI)-teknologier i forskning om språkliga
landskap (LL). Traditionellt har LL-forskning förlitat sig på manuell datainsamling och analys, vilket ofta innebär fotografier av
offentliga skyltar, annonser och andra visuella språkdisplayer. Men denna manuella metod kan innebära utmaningar, inklusive
tidskrävande datainsamling, inkonsekvent datakvalitet och potentiell forskarbias. Två AI-teknologier är särskilt lovande för att
möta dessa utmaningar inom LL-forskning: datorseende (CV) och stora språkmodeller (LLM). CV automatiserar identifieringen och
extraktionen av text från bilder, förbättrar data noggrannhet och möjliggör storskalig bildanalys. LLM, som bygger på naturlig
språkbehandling (NLP), kan upptäcka, översätta och tolka flerspråkig text. Denna artikel utforskar möjligheter och utmaningar med
att använda AI-teknologier i LL-forskning och diskuterar metoder för att förbättra datainsamlingen, öka noggrannheten och stödja
analysen av flerspråkiga miljöer. Den tar också upp etiska frågor och begränsningar med teknologierna.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1AI technologies
- 2.Affordances of using AI technologies in LL research
- 2.1Image recognition
- 2.1.1Improving image quality
- 2.1.2Identifying & coding text
- 2.1.3Collecting and analyzing big data
- 2.2Natural language processing (NLP)
- 2.3Geospatial analysis
- 2.4Example 1: Geospatial analysis of bilingual signage captured from Google Earth
- 2.5Example 2: AI-assisted signage analysis in the NYC subway
- 2.1Image recognition
- 3.Future directions AI technologies in LL research
- 3.1Predictive modeling
- 3.2Dynamic landscapes of the future: Landscapes in Augmented Reality
- 4.Limitations and ethical considerations of AI technologies in LL research
- 4.1Technology limitations
- 4.2Privacy concerns
- 4.3Cultural sensitivity & accuracy
- 5.Conclusion
References
References (47)
Akoto, Osei Yaw, Onumah, Ebenezer & Amoakohene, Benjamin (2024). Exploring
incongruity and humour in Linguistic Landscapes in Ghana. Linguistic
Landscape, 10(2), 166–189.
Al-Heeti, Abrar (2024, June). Travelers,
Rejoice: Google Translate Adds 110 New Languages, Thanks to AI. [URL]. CNET.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2014). Computer-mediated
communication and Linguistic Landscapes. Research methods in sociolinguistics: A practical
guide, 741, 90.
Apple (2024). Vision
Pro. [URL]
Ben-Rafael, Eliezar, Shohamy, Elana, Amara, Muhammad Hassan & Trumper-Hecht, Nira (2006). Linguistic
Landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of
Israel. In Durk Gorter (Ed.), Linguistic
landscape: A new approach to
multilingualism (pp. 7–30). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Biró, Enikő (2018). More
than a Facebook share: Exploring virtual Linguistic Landscape. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae,
Philologica, 10(2), 181–192.
(2021). Speak
global, sell local? Digital Linguistic Landscape of local small businesses in the social
media. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae,
Philologica, 131, 177–193.
Blackwood, Robert (2019). Language,
images, and Paris Orly airport on Instagram: multilingual approaches to identity and self-representation on social
media. International Journal of
Multilingualism, 16(1), 7–24.
Burr, Solvita (2021). Linguistic
Landscape signs in e-textbooks: Teaching language as a compass for exploring multimodal texts, multilingualism, and digital
resources. Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2021.
Carlson, Nicholas (2012). The
end of the smartphone era is coming. Business
Insider, 221. [URL]
Dunn, Jonathan, Coupe, Tom & Adams, Benjamin (2021). Measuring
linguistic diversity during covid-19. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2104.01290.
Gaiser, Leonie Elisa & Matras, Yaron (2021). Using
smartphones to document Linguistic Landscapes: the LinguaSnapp mobile app. Linguistics
Vanguard, 7(s1), 20190012.
García González, Elisabet, Liu, Liquan & Lanza, Elizabeth (2024). Language
in multilingual families during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: a survey of challenges and
opportunities. Multilingua, 43(2), 163–190.
Gilles, Peter & Ziegler, Evelyn (2021). Exploring
corpus linguistics approaches in Linguistic Landscape research with automatic text recognition
software. In Evelyn Ziegler & Heiko. F. Marten (Eds.) Linguistic
Landscapes im deutschsprachigen context: Forschungsperspektiven, methoden und
anwendungsmöglichkeiten (pp. 65–86). Berlin: Peter Lang.
Google (2024). 110 new languages are
coming to Google Translate. [URL]
Google Maps (2024). Google Earth
version 10.55.0.1 Retrieved May
29, 2024, from [URL]
Gorter, Durk (2018). Methods
and techniques for Linguistic Landscape research: About definitions, core issues and technological
innovations. In Martin Pütz & Neele-Frederike Mundt (Eds). Expanding
the Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Language Policy and the Use of Space as a Semiotic
Resource. (pp. 38–57). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Grzech, Karolina & Dohle, Ebany (2018). Language
Landscape. An innovative tool for documenting and analysing Linguistic Landscapes. Lingue e
Linguaggi, 251, 65–80.
Hong, Seong-Yun (2020). Linguistic
landscapes on street-level images. ISPRS International Journal of
Geo-Information, 9(1), 57.
Hiippala, Tuomo, Hausmann, Anna, Tenkanen, Henrikki & Toivonen, Tuuli (2019). Exploring
the Linguistic Landscape of geotagged social media content in urban environments, Digital
Scholarship in the
Humanities, 34(2), 290–309,
Hult, Francis M. (2018). Language policy and planning
and Linguistic Landscapes. In James W. Tollefson & Miguel Pérez-Milans (Eds.), The
Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning [Online
edition]. Oxford Academic.
Ivkovic Dejan & Lotherington, Heather (2009). Multilingualism
in cyberspace: Conceptualising the virtual Linguistic Landscape. International Journal of
Multilingualism, 6(1), 17–36.
Kalocsányiová, Erika, Essex, Ryan & Poulter, Damian (2023). Risk
and health communication during covid-19: a Linguistic Landscape analysis, Health
Communication, 38(6), 1080–1089,
Khabibullaevna, Navruza Alieva & Kizi, Otakhonova Nurjakhon Ilkhomjon (2023). Unveiling the labyrinth
of internet phraseology: Navigating the Linguistic Landscape of the digital era. Qo ‘Qon
Universiteti
Xabarnomasi, 71, 78–81.
Lexander, Kristin Vold & Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2021). Working
with mediagrams: A methodology for collaborative research on mediational repertoires in multilingual
families. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural
Development, 42(1), 1–18.
Lyons, Kate (2019). Let’s
get phygital: Seeing through the ‘filtered’ landscapes of Instagram. Linguistic
Landscape, 5(2), 179–197.
Macalister, John (2024). Language
policy and national identity evolution in a new nation: A Timorese Linguistic Landscape
revisited. Linguistic
Landscape, 10(2), 111–135.
Malinowski, David (2018). Linguistic
Landscape. In Aek Phakiti, Paul De Costa, Luke Plonsky & Sue Starfield (Eds.) The
Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research
methodology (pp. 869–885). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Migge, Bettina (2023). Assessing
the place of minoritized languages in postcolonial contexts using the Linguistic Landscape: The role of ethnographic
information. Linguistic
Landscape, 9(4), 329–356.
Mitits, Lydia (2022). The
Covid-19 pandemic within a global Linguistic Landscape: A comparative case study. Aegean
Working Papers in Ethnographic
Linguistics, 31, 176–201.
(2024b). How ChatGPT and our
language models are developed. [URL]
Ortiz, Brennan (n.d.). NYC’s
micro neighborhoods: Little Dominican Republic in Washington Heights, Manhattan. Untapped New York. [URL]
Pennycook, Alastair & Otsuji, Emi (2015). Making
scents of the landscape. Linguistic
Landscape 1(3), 191–212.
Purschke, Christoph (2017). Crowdsourcing
the Linguistic Landscape of a multilingual country. Introducing Lingscape in
Luxembourg. Linguistik
online, 85(6).
(2021). Crowdscapes.
Participatory research and the collaborative (re) construction of Linguistic Landscapes with
Lingscape. Linguistics
vanguard, 7(s1), 20190032.
Rosendal, Tove, Nielsen, Helle Lykke, Järlehed, Johan, Milani, Tomasso M. & Löfdahl, Maria (2023). Language,
translocality and urban change: Online and offline signage in four Gothenburg
neighbourhoods. Linguistic
Landscape, 9(2), 181–210.
Scarvaglieri, Claudio, Redder, Angelika, Pappenhagen, Ruth, & Brehmer, Bernhard (2013). Capturing
diversity: Linguistic land- and soundscaping. In Joana Duarte & Ingrid Gogolin (Eds.) Linguistic
superdiversity in urban areas: Research
approaches (pp. 45–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Scollon, Ron & Scollon, Suzie Wong (2003). Discourses in Place:
Language in the material
world. London: Routledge.
Shohamy, Elana (2015). LL
research as expanding language and language policy. Linguistic
Landscape, 1(1/2), 152–171.
Soukup, Barbara (2020). Survey
Area Selection in Variationist Linguistic Landscape Study (VaLLS) A Report from Vienna,
Austria. Linguistic
Landscape, 6(1), 52–79.
U.S. Housing and Urban
Development (2024). Title VI civil rights act [URL]
Vinagre, Margarita (2022). Engaging
with difference: Integrating the Linguistic Landscape in virtual
exchange. System, 1051, 102750.
Voss, Erik (2024). Artificial
intelligence in language assessment. In A. Kunnan (Ed.) The
Concise Companion to Language
Assessment (pp. 112–125). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Wei, Zichao & Qin, Yewei (2023). Using
eye tracking to investigate what native Chinese speakers notice about Linguistic Landscape
images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.08906.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Buckley, Pamela R., Diana Fishbein & Neil J. Wollman
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
