Article published In: 10th Anniversary Issue: Engaging with LL futures
Edited by Robert Blackwood and Elana Shohamy
[Linguistic Landscape 10:4] 2024
► pp. 346–369
Landscaping gender, sexuality, and hope in the 2022 Philippine presidential elections
Published online: 5 August 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.24006.go
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.24006.go
Abstract
This paper investigates the Linguistic Landscape (LL) of Leni Robredo’s 2022 presidential campaign rallies in the
Philippines and explores the role of gender and sexuality in constructing prefigurative spaces within the offline-online nexus.
Through artifacts used during the campaign, the paper examines how Robredo supporters utilize semiotic resources and intertextual
references from popular and meme culture as well as LGBTQ+ media to adopt stances vis-à-vis gender and sexuality. The paper
suggests that the aggregation of these stances elicit affects that facilitate a prefigurative genderscape where participants enact
an ethos of hope. While these practices cannot completely transcend entrenched forms of power (e.g., macho populism and dynastic
democracy), they materialize a potential future characterized by a people-driven movement. The paper proposes a future direction
for LL studies: engaging prefigurative politics in the examination of the emergent spaces that respond to increasing precarity and
sociopolitical upheavals.
Keywords: gender, sexuality, prefigurative politics, stance, affect, offline-online nexus, hope
Abstrak
Nilalayon ng pananaliksik na ito na siyasatin ang linguistic landscape (LL) ng kampanya ni Leni Robredo para sa
pagkapangulo ng Pilipinas noong 2022, at ang papel ng kasarian at sekswalidad sa paglikha ng prefigurative spaces sa ugnayang
online-offline. Sa pamamagitan ng mga artepakto mula sa kampanya, susuriin ng pananaliksik na ito kung papaano ginamit ng mga
tagasuporta ni Robredo ang mga semiotikong elemento at mga intertekstuwal na batayan mula sa kulturang popular at meme, kabilang
na ang LGBTQ+ media sa paghubog ng kanilang pananaw ukol sa usapin ng kasarian at sekswalidad. Iminumungkahi ng pag-aaral na ito
na ang kalipunan ng ganitong pananaw ay nakapagpapalutang ng mga damdaming nakapagbubukas at nakahuhubog ng prefigurative
genderscape kung saan ang mga kalahok ay nakapagsasakilos ng etos ng pag-asa. Bagama’t ang mga pagsasakilos na ito ay hindi ganap
na nakaaalpas sa matatatag nang anyo ng kapangyarihan gaya ng macho populismo at dynastikong demokrasya, nakalilikha naman ang mga
ito ng isang larawan ng hinaharap na hinubog ng sama-samang pagkilos. Ipinapanukala ng pananaliksik na ito ang isang direksyon ng
pag-aaral ng LL sa hinaharap: ang paggamit ng lente ng prefigurative politics sa pagsisiyasat ng nagsusulputang espasyo na
tumutugon sa patuloy na pagbabago at paglala ng mga kalagayang sosyopolitikal.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Genderscapes and prefigurative territories
- 3.Theoretical framework: Stance and affective practice
- 4.Data and methods
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Representations of empowered femininity
- 5.2Remixing of gender and sexual discourses with official campaign slogans
- 5.3Gender and sexuality vis-à-vis affects
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (73)
Anderson, Ben. (2006). Becoming
and being hopeful: towards a theory of affect. Environment and planning d: society and
space, 24(5), 733–752.
Arugay, Aries. (2022). Foreign
policy & disinformation narratives in the 2022 Philippine election campaign. ISEAS
Perspective, 591, 1–9.
Arugay, Aries & Baquisal, Justin K. A. (2023). Bowed, Bent, &
Broken: Duterte’s Assaults on Civil Society in the Philippines. Journal of Current Southeast
Asian
Affairs, 42(3), 328–349.
Asara, Viviana & Kallis, Giorgos. (2023). The
prefigurative politics of social movements and their processual production of space: The case of the indignados
movement. Environment and Planning C: Politics and
Space, 41(1), 56–76.
Bancud, Andrea. (2023, May 23). UNAIDS:
PLHIV in the PH could reach 364,000 by 2030. Philippine Information
Agency. (Accessed January 12,
2024) [URL]
Ben-Rafael, Eliezer, Shohamy, Elana, Muhammad, Hasan A. & Trumper-Hecht, Nira. (2006). Linguistic
Landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International
Journal of
Multilingualism, 3(1), 7–30.
Blommaert, Jan. (2019). From
groups to actions and back in online-offline
sociolinguistics. Multilingua, 38(4), 485–493.
Bolander, Brook, & Locher, Miriam A. (2020). Beyond the online
offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse. Discourse, context &
media, 351, 100383.
Borba, Rodrigo. (2019). Injurious
signs: The geopolitics of hate and hope in the Linguistic Landscape of a political
crisis. In Amenia Peck, Christopher Stroud & Quentin Williams (Eds.), Making
sense of people and place in Linguistic
Landscapes, (pp. 161–181). London: Bloomsbury.
Cameron, Deborah. (2022). Women,
civility and the language of politics: realities and representations. The Political
Quarterly, 93(1), 25–31.
Carr, Joetta L. (2013). The SlutWalk movement: A study
in transnational feminist activism. Journal of Feminist
Scholarship, 4(4), 24–38.
Datta, Anindita. (2016). The
genderscapes of hate: On violence against women in India. Dialogues in Human
Geography, 6(2), 178–181.
De Los Reyes, Robin. A. (2014). Language of “order”: English
in the Linguistic Landscape of two major train stations in the Philippines. Asian Journal of
English Language
Studies, 2(1), 24–49.
de Vasconcelos Barboza, Rafael & Borba, Rodrigo. (2018). Linguistic
Landscapes as pornoheterotopias:(De) regulating gender and sexuality in the public
toilet. Linguistic
Landscape, 4(3), 257–277.
Doroja-Cadiente, Glenda & Valdez, Paolo. N. (2019). A Linguistic Landscape
Analysis of Public Signs After Typhoon Haiyan. International Journal of Asia-Pacific
Studies, 15(1), 33–57.
Du Bois, John W. (2007). The stance
triangle. In Robert Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking
in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation,
interaction, (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dussault, Joëlle. (2022). The
prefigurative politics of place-making: Analysis of a neighbourhood-based campaign for a social
centre. Emotion, Space and
Society, 441, 100901.
Dulay, Dean, Hicken, Allen, Menon, Anil & Holmes, Ronald. (2023). Continuity,
history, and identity: why Bongbong Marcos won the 2022 Philippine presidential
election. Pacific
Affairs, 96(1), 85–104.
Elan, Priya. (2020, October 21). Pink
emerges as 2020’s colour of political protest. The
Guardian. (Accessed Jan 12,
2024). [URL]
Esteron, Jerico. J. (2021). English in the Churchscape:
Exploring a religious Linguistic Landscape in the Philippines. Discourse and
Interaction, 14(2), 82–104.
Evangelista, John. A. (2017). ‘Queering Rodrigo
Duterte.’ In Nicole Curato (Ed.), A
Duterte Reader: Critical Essays on Rodrigo Duterte’s Early
Presidency, (pp. 251–262). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Hapal, Karl. (2021). The
Philippines’ COVID-19 response: Securitising the pandemic and disciplining the pasaway. Journal
of Current Southeast Asian
Affairs, 40(2), 224–244.
Heugh, Kathleen, Stroud, Christopher, Taylor-Leech, Kerry & De Costa, Peter I. (Eds.). (2021). A
Sociolinguistics of the South. Routledge.
Hincks, Joseph. (2018, Dec. 11). She
Reported From War Zones. But Covering Philippine President Duterte Might Be Her Most Dangerous Job
Yet. Time. (Accessed January 12, 2024) [URL]
Hiramoto, Mie & Vitorio, Raymund. (2018). Linguistic
Landscapes of Language and Sexuality. In Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (Eds.), The
Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality. Online
Jaffe, Alexandra. (Ed.). (2009). Stance:
sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jaworski, Adam & Thurlow, Crispin. (Eds.). (2010). Semiotic
Landscapes: Language, image,
space. London: Continuum
. (2009). Taking
an elitist stance: Ideology and the discursive production of
distinction. In Alexandra Jaffe (Ed.), Stance:
Sociolinguistic
perspectives (pp. 195–226), New York: Oxford University Press.
Kaur-Gill, Satveer & Dutta, Mohan J. (2017). Digital
Ethnography. In Jörg Matthes, Christine S. Davis & Robert F. Potter (Eds.), The
International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods.
Kiesling, Scott F. (2018). Masculine stances and the
linguistics of affect: On masculine
ease. Norma, 13(3–4), 191–212.
Koller, Veronika. (2008). Not
just a colour: pink as a gender and sexuality marker in visual communication. Visual
communication, 7(4), 395–423.
Kress, Gunther & van Leeuwen, Theo. (2020). Reading
Images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
Lakoff, Robin. (2003). Language,
gender, and politics: Putting ‘women’ and ‘power’ in the same
sentence. In Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (Eds.), The
Handbook of Language and
Gender, (pp. 161–178). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
Lazar, Michelle. M. (2021). Gender and sexuality in
discourse. In Jo Angouri & Judith Baxter (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of language, gender, and
sexuality, (pp. 481–493). New York: Routledge.
Leiser, Anne. (2022). Psychological
Perspectives on Participatory Culture: Core Motives for the Use of Political Internet
Memes. Journal of Social and Political
Psychology, 10(1), 236–252.
Lombard, Ella. J., Azpeitia, Jovani & Cheryan, Sapna. (2021). Built
on Uneven Ground: How Masculine Defaults Disadvantage Women in Political
Leadership. Psychological
Inquiry, 32(2), 107–116.
Manalastas, Nicko. E. L. (2024). Domain dichotomy and
sociolinguistic inequality in Philippine museum spaces: Evidence from the Linguistic
Landscape. Linguistic Landscape. Advance online
publication. [URL]
Maramara, Kyzia. (2022, March 8). VP
Leni Robredo Supporters Take Their Placard Game to a Different Level; Here are the Funniest Ones We’ve
Seen. 8list.ph. (Accessed Jan 12, 2024). [URL]
McCargo, Duncan. (2023). Philippine
Elections 2022: Why Leni’s Fifteen Million Votes Were Not Enough. Contemporary Southeast
Asia, 44(3), 357–366.
McCulloch, Gretchen. (2019). Because
internet: Understanding how language is changing. New York: Random House.
McFarland, Katherine. (2012). Cultural
contestation and community building at LGBT Pride parades. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation; Chapel Hill, South Carolina.
Mendoza, John. (2022, February 13). 20,000
supporters show up for Robredo in QC
rally. Inquirer.net. (Accessed Jan 12, 2024). [URL]
Mendoza, Maria. E. (2023, March 9). Posting
for Profit: Social Media Influencers in Philippine
Politics. Fulcrum. (Accessed Jan 12, 2024). [URL]
Milani, Tommaso. M. (2014). Sexed signs–queering the
scenery. International Journal of the Sociology of Language,
2014(228), 201–205.
Milani, Tommaso. M. & Levon, Erez. (2019). Israel
as homotopia: Language, space, and vicious belonging. Language in
Society, 48(4), 607–628.
. (2016). Sexing
diversity: Linguistic Landscapes of homonationalism. Language &
Communication, 511, 69–86.
Monje, Jennifer. (2017). ‘Hindi
Bayani/not a hero’: the Linguistic Landscape of protest in Manila. Social
Inclusion, 5(4), 14–28.
Motschenbacher, Heiko. (2020). Walking
on Wilton Drive: A Linguistic Landscape analysis of a homonormative space. Language &
Communication, 721, 25–43.
Oser, Jennifer, Grinson, Amit, Boulianne, Shelley & Halperin, Eran. (2022). How
political efficacy relates to online and offline political participation: A multilevel
meta-analysis. Political
Communication, 39(5), 607–633.
Parmanand, Sharmila. (2022). Macho
populists versus COVID: Comparing political masculinities. European Journal of Women’s
Studies, 29(1_suppl), 43S–59S.
Rafael, Vicente. L. (2021). The Sovereign Trickster: Death and
laughter in the age of Duterte. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
Ratcliffe, Rebecca. (2022, March 8). Philippines
faces stark election choice – dictator’s son or human rights lawyer? The
Guardian. (Accessed Jan 12,
2024). [URL]
Rowlett, Benedict. J. & Go, Christian. (2024). “The
Amazingly Fabulous Tuk tuk Race”: mobility and carnival praxis in the semiotic landscape of Phnom Penh
Pride. Social
Semiotics, 34(3), 430–448.
Rubdy, Rani & Said, Selim Ben. (Eds.). (2015). Conflict,
exclusion and dissent in the Linguistic
Landscape. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Shohamy, Elana & Waksman, Shoshi. (2009). Linguistic
Landscape as an ecological arena: Modalities, meanings, negotiation,
education. In Elana Shohamy & Durk Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic
Landscape: Expanding the
Scenery, (pp. 313–331). New York: Routledge.
Slobe, Tyanna. (2018). Style,
stance, and social meaning in mock white girl. Language in
Society, 47(4), 541–567.
Strange, Louis. (2023). Ní
Saoirse go Saoirse na mBan: Gender and the Irish language in the Linguistic Landscape of Ireland’s 2018 abortion
referendum. Language in
Society, 52(2), 215–239.
. (2022). The
discursive construction of gender and agency in the Linguistic Landscape of Ireland’s 2018 abortion referendum
campaign. Critical Discourse
Studies, 1–29.
Taruc, Earl. (2024, Feb 29). How
Gloc-9’s ‘Sirena’ Empowered a Generation of Queer
Filipinos. Zeen. (Accessed May 28, 2024) [URL]
Törnberg, Anton. (2021). Prefigurative
politics and social change: A typology drawing on transition studies. Distinktion: Journal of
Social
Theory, 22(1), 83–107.
Vacras, Michael. (2022, April 9). Presidential
aspirant and Vice President Leni Robredo reads placards made by her supporters during Awra Aurora Grand Rally on
Saturday. Facebook. [URL]
van de Sande, Mathijs. (2022). Prefigurative
Democracy: Protest, Social Movements and the Political Institution of
Society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Van Dijk, Teun. A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse: An analysis
of ethnic prejudice in cognition and
conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Wee, Lionel. (2016). Situating
affect in Linguistic Landscapes. Linguistic
Landscape, 2(2), 105–126.
Wilson, John & Boxer, Diana. (Eds.) (2015). Discourse,
politics and women as global leaders. Discourse, Politics and Women as Global
Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Buso Jr, Nelson Mangaldan
L. Mangana, Mellianne
Rowlett, Benedict J. L., Pavadee Saisuwan, Christian Go, Li-Chi Chen & Mie Hiramoto
McInerney, Erin
2024. Authorship, ownership, and ethics in datafied discourse on Instagram. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 10:4 ► pp. 425 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
