Article published In: Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 9:2 (2023) ► pp.133–157
‘Beirut you will rise again’
A critical discourse historiographical analysis of the Beiruti Linguistic Landscape
Published online: 7 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21040.kar
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21040.kar
Abstract
This study examines the Linguistic Landscape (LL) of two streets in Beirut (Foch and Weygand) following a series of protests in October 2019 against the Lebanese government. We analyzed signs of protest on those two streets collected in 2020 and compared them to archival data collected back in 2015 prior to the commencement of the protests. We drew upon an expanding LL literature of contestation and resistance and theoretically framed our study in concepts of reclaiming public spaces through protest signs (Martín Rojo, L. M. (2014a). Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), 583–598. ). Photographic data was collected and analyzed based on a critical discourse historiographical approach ( (2017). Understanding the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement: A critical discourse historiographical approach. Discourse & Society, 28(5), 453–472. ). Implications with regard to Beirut’s changing identity and conflicting discourses of protest, hope, and censorship competing for space on its streets are presented. The study also presents asynchronous narrative layering as an approach that addresses historical and cultural dimensions and power structures that underlie the narratives that shape protest movements.
الملخص
تبحث هذه الدراسة في المشهد اللغوي لشارعين في بيروت (فوش وويغان) بعد سلسلة من الاحتجاجات التي انفجرت في تشرين الأول / أكتوبر 2019 ضد الحكومة اللبنانية. فقمنا بتحليل لافتات الاحتجاجات التي جمعناها من هذين الشارعين في العام 2020 وقارناها بالبيانات الأرشيفية التي جمعناها في العام 2015 قبل بدء الاحتجاجات. كما استندنا إلى أبحاث موسعة حول المشهد اللغوي، وقمنا بتأطير دراستنا نظريًا في مفاهيم استعادة الأماكن العامة من خلال لافتات الاحتجاجات (Martín Rojo, L. M. (2014a). Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), 583–598. ). إضافة إلى ذلك، جمعنا البيانات الفوتوغرافية وحلّلناها بناءً على نهج تأريخي للخطاب النقدي ( (2017). Understanding the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement: A critical discourse historiographical approach. Discourse & Society, 28(5), 453–472. ) وعرضنا التداعيات على الهوية المتغيرة لبيروت وخطابات الاحتجاج والأمل والرقابة التي تتنافس على مساحة في شوارعها. وتقدم أيضًا الدراسة الطبقات السردية غير المتزامنة كنهج يعالج الأبعاد التاريخية والثقافية وهياكل القوة الكامنة وراء السرديات التي تشكل الحركات الاحتجاجية.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Beiruti context
- 3.Linguistic Landscapes of protest and resistance
- 4.Methodology
- 4.1Research design
- 4.2Data collection and analysis
- 5.Findings
- 5.1Between 2015 and 2020: Protest signs reclaiming the Beiruti LL
- 5.2Processes of reappropriation
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
References
References (35)
Aboelezz, M. (2014). The Geosemiotics of Tahrir Square: a study of the relationship between discourse and space. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), 599–622.
Achugar, M. (2008). What we remember: The construction of memory in military discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Al-Naimat, G. K. (2020). Semiotic analysis of the visual signs of protest on online Jordanian platforms: Code choice and language mobility. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(1), 61–70.
Azzi, D. (2019, July 21). The Devaluation of the Lebanese Dollar. Dan Azzi. [URL]
BBC News. (2020). Beirut explosion: What we know so far. Retrieved from [URL]
Ben Said, S. & Kasanga, L. (2016). The Discourse of Protest: Frames of identity, intertextuality and interdiscursivity. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza, & H. Woldermariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes, pp.68–83. London: Bloomsbury.
Blackwood, R., Lanza, E., & Woldemariam, H. (2016). Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes. London: Bloomsbury.
(2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Daily Star. (2015). ‘Abu Rakhussa’ brings pre-war nostalgia to Downtown Beirut. Retrieved from [URL]
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Esposito, M. R. (2020). Unheard voices of a rebel city: Re-appropriation of rights through the city walls. In L. Siragusa & J. K. Ferguson (Eds.), Responsibility and language practices in place, pp. 62–78. Helsinki: Studia Fennica.
Flowerdew, J. (2016). A historiographical approach to Hong Kong Occupy: Focus on a critical moment. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(5), 527–548.
(2017). Understanding the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement: A critical discourse historiographical approach. Discourse & Society, 28(5), 453–472.
Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 1711, 5–17.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2015). Small stories research: Methods, analysis, outreach. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis, pp. 255–271. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Homsi, N. (2018, January 23). A sea of trash on Lebanon’s beaches. The New York Times. [URL]
Karam, F. J., Warren, A., Kibler, A. K., & Shweiry, Z. (2020). Beiruti linguistic landscape: An analysis of private store fronts. International Journal of Multilingualism, 17(2), 196–214.
Kasanga, L. A. (2014). The linguistic landscape: Mobile signs, code choice, symbolic meaning and territoriality in the discourse of protest. International journal of the sociology of language, 2301, 19–44.
Lou, J. J., & Jaworski, A. (2016). Itineraries of protest signage: Semiotic landscape and the mythologizing of the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(5), 612–645.
Makdisi, S. (1997). Laying claim to Beirut: Urban narrative and spatial identity in the age of Solidere. Critical Inquiry, 23(3), 661–705.
Martín Rojo, L. M. (2014a). Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), 583–598.
(2014b). Taking over the Square: The role of linguistic practices in contesting urban spaces. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), 623–652.
Pavlenko, A. (2009). Language conflict in post-Soviet linguistic landscapes. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 17(1), 247–274.
Pennycook, A. (2009). Linguistic landscape and transgressive semiotics of graffiti. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery, pp. 302–311). London: Routledge.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.), pp. 87–121. London: Sage.
Rubdy, R., & Ben Said, S. (2015). Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic landscape. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sebastian, P. (2019). Signs of resistance in the Asturian linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 5(3), 302–329.
Seals, C. A. (2015). Overcoming erasure: Reappropriation of space in the linguistic landscape of mass-scale protests. In S. Ben Said & R. Rubdy (Eds.), Conflict, exclusion, and dissent in the linguistic landscape (pp. 223–238). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Seargeant, P., & Giaxoglou, K. (2019). Discourse and the linguistic landscape. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Studies, pp. 306–326. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Macalister, John
2024. Language policy and national identity evolution in a new nation. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 10:2 ► pp. 111 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
