Article published In: The Linguistic Landscape of Covid-19:
Edited by Jackie Jia Lou, David Malinowski and Amiena Peck
[Linguistic Landscape 8:2/3] 2022
► pp. 168–183
Covid-19 and public responsibility
A multimodal critical discourse analysis of blaming the public during the UK’s third wave
Published online: 1 September 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21034.str
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21034.str
Abstract
This paper offers an analysis of a British government publicity campaign during the third national lockdown, which began in England in January 2021. When it came to enforcing lockdown rules, the government’s messaging in the Linguistic Landscape (LL) and elsewhere focused on individualising responsibility for the pandemic. This framing favoured the political interests of the government by apportioning blame for the highest death toll in Europe to the British public’s reckless behaviour, which conveniently elides the government’s own role in the crisis. Drawing on data from social media and the LL, I analyse the publicity campaign according to a Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis approach, taking into account the multiple semiotic systems employed to communicate the campaign’s underlying neoliberal ideology.
Résumé
Cet article offre une analyse d’une campagne d’information du gouvernement britannique pendant le troisième période de confinement nationale, qui a commencé en janvier 2021. En ce qui concerne l’application du règlement de confinement, la rhétorique du gouvernement au paysage linguistique et ailleurs se concentrait sur la responsabilité individuelle de la pandémie. Cette manière de présenter la pandémie favorisait les intérêts politiques du gouvernement en attribuant la responsabilité du bilan des morts le plus haut en Europe au comportement imprudent du public Britannique, ce qui omet le rôle du gouvernement dans la crise. En utilisant des données des réseaux sociaux et du paysage linguistique, j’analyse la campagne d’information selon la perspective de l’analyse critique et multimodale du discours, tenant en compte les multiples systèmes sémiotiques employés afin de communiquer l’idéologie néolibérale sous-jacente de la campagne.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 3.Theoretical approach
- 4.Analysis
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (35)
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M.H., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1): 7–30.
Correa, D., & Shohamy, E. (2018). Commodification of women’s breasts. Linguistic Landscape, 4(3): 298–319.
Harvey, F. (2021). Tories accused of corruption and NHS privatisation by former chief scientist. The Guardian: [URL]
Holborow, M. (2012). What is neoliberalism? Discourse, ideology and the real world. In D. Block, J. Gray, & M. Holborow (eds.), Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics, 14–32. Oxford: Routledge.
Institute for Government. (2021). Timeline of UK coronavirus lockdowns, March 2020 to March 2021. [URL]
Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2010). Introducing Semiotic Landscapes. In A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (eds.), Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, 1–40. London: Continuum.
Joppke, C. (2021). Nationalism in the neoliberal order: Old wine in new bottles? Nations and Nationalism, (March): 1–16.
Kallen, J., Ní Dhonnacha, E., & Wade, K. (2020). Online Linguistic Landscapes: Discourse, Globalization, and Enregisterment. In D. Malinowski & S. Tufi (eds.), Reterritorializing Linguistic Landscapes: Questioning Boundaries and Opening Spaces, 97–116. London: Bloomsbury.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2018). Multi-modal Critical Discourse Analysis. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, 60–76. London: Routledge.
Lemke, T. (2001). “The birth of bio-politics”: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2): 190–207.
Lou, J. J., & Jaworski, A. (2016). Itineraries of protest signage. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(5): 609–642.
Lyons, K. (2019). Let’s get phygital: Seeing through the ‘filtered’ landscapes of Instagram. Linguistic Landscape, 5(2): 179–197.
Machin, D. (2016). The need for a social and affordance-driven multimodal critical discourse studies. Discourse and Society, 27(3): 322–334.
Martin, G., & Roberts, S. (2021). Exploring legacies of the baby boomers in the twenty-first century. Sociological Review, 69(4): 727–742.
Martín Rojo, L., & Del Percio, A. (2020). Neoliberalism, language, and governmentality. In L. Martín Rojo & A. Del Percio (eds.), Language and Neoliberal Governmentality, 1–26. London: Routledge.
Milani, T. (2014). Sexed Signs – Queering the scenery. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2281: 201–225.
Modan, G. & Wells, K. J. (this issue). Signs at work: New labor relations and structures of feeling in Washington, D.C.’s Covid landscape. Linguistic Landscape.
Office for National Statistics. (2020). Comparisons of all-cause mortality between European countries and regions. [URL]
Rayner, G., Tominey, C., & Hymas, C. (2020). “Go back to work or risk losing your job”: Major drive launched to get people returning to the office. The Telegraph: [URL]
Schröter, M., & Taylor, C. (2018). Introduction. In M. Schröter & C. Taylor (eds.), Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse Empirical Approaches, 1–21. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.
Semino, E. (2020). “Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters” – Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication, 36(1): 50–58.
Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S. (2009). Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, mobility and space in a South African township. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3): 363–386.
Svennevig, J. (2021). How to do things with signs. The formulation of directives on signs in public spaces. Journal of Pragmatics, 1751: 165–183.
Transport for London. (2019). Travel in London: Understanding our diverse communities 2019. A summary of existing research. Transport for London: [URL]
Tufi, S. (this issue). Hybrid places: The reconfiguration of domestic space in the time of Covid-19. Linguistic Landscape.
U.K. Government. (2021). Deaths in the UK. Coronavirus in the UK: [URL]
UK Parliament Public Accounts Committee. (2021). “Unimaginable” cost of Test & Trace failed to deliver central promise of averting another lockdown: [URL]
van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal, 14(2): 139–155.
(2017). Legitimation and Multimodality. In R. Wodak & B. Forchtner (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, 218–232. Oxon: Routledge.
Zhou, F. (this issue). Aggressive banners, dialect-shouting village heads, and their online fame: Construction and consumption of rural Linguistic Landscapes in China’s anti-Covid campaign. Linguistic Landscape.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Buso Jr, Nelson Mangaldan
Gu, Chonglong & Brian Hok-Shing Chan
Lyu, Tianxiong
Rathnayake, Chamil, Angela Smith & Michael Higgins
2023. Emergent Twitter publics through political scandal. Journal of Language and Politics 22:4 ► pp. 458 ff.
Robinson, Justyna A., Rhys J. Sandow & Roberta Piazza
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2022. Scaling the pandemic dispositive. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 8:2-3 ► pp. 131 ff.
Douglas, Gordon C. C.
Milak, Eldin
Modan, Gabriella & Katie J. Wells
Phyak, Prem & Bal Krishna Sharma
2022. Citizen Linguistic Landscape, bordering practices, and semiotic ideology in the COVID-19 pandemic. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 8:2-3 ► pp. 219 ff.
Zhou, Feifei
2022. Aggressive banners, dialect-shouting village heads, and their online fame. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 8:2-3 ► pp. 248 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
