Article published In: Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 9:1 (2023) ► pp.59–85
Social actors in the Singaporean LL
Sign uptake, market ideology, and language hierarchies
Published online: 19 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.20031.tsi
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.20031.tsi
Abstract
This paper examines the uptake and interpretation of the Linguistic Landscape of Singapore by members of the community. The main goal is to explore Singaporeans’ ideologies pertaining to the languages depicted in the LL, as these ideologies instantiate themselves through interview discourses focusing on the signs. More specifically, participants’ ideologies emerge through the indexicalities they assign to the various languages and semiotic signs depicted in the LL, indexicalities such as globalness, localness, and prestige.
Keywords: Singapore, LL uptake, LL interpretation, interviews, language ideology, neoliberalism
Περίληψη
Αυτό το άρθρο εξετάζει την πρόσληψη και ερμηνεία του γλωσσικού τοπίου της Σιγκαπούρης από μέλη της κοινότητας. Ο κύριος στόχος είναι η εξερεύνηση των ιδεολογιών που έχουν οι Σιγκαπουριανοί σχετικά με τις γλώσσες που απεικονίζονται στο γλωσσικό τοπίο, όπως αυτές οι ιδεολογίες εμφανίζονται μέσα από αφηγηματικές πρακτικές εστιασμένες σε πινακίδες. Συγκεκριμένα, οι ιδεολογίες των συμμετεχόντων στην έρευνα αναδύονται μέσα από τους δείκτες που αναθέτουν στις διάφορες γλώσσες και σημιοτικά στοιχεία που απεικονίζονται στο γλωσσικό τοπίο, δείκτες όπως παγκοσμιότητα, τοπικότητα, και γόητρο.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Linguistic landscapes: Languages, people, spaces
- 2.1LLs as reflecting ideology
- 2.2Neoliberalism as a hegemonic ideology
- 2.2.1Neoliberalism and globalization influence the LL
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Analysis and discussion
- 4.1Overarching market ideology
- 4.2Niche markets: Authenticity/the local
- 4.3Niche markets: The global
- 4.4Niche markets and linguistic hierarchies
- 4.5Local-Global hybrids and linguistic hierarchies
- 5.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (55)
Alsagoff, L. (2010). English in Singapore: Culture, capital and identity in linguistic variation. World Englishes, 29(3), 336–348.
Barnes, A. (2017). Telling stories: The role of graphic design and branding in the creation of ‘authenticity’ within food packaging. International Journal of Food Design, 2(2), 183–202.
Barni, M., & Bagna, C. (2015). The critical turn in LL: New methodologies and new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1), 6–18.
Ben-Rafael, E., E. Shohamy, M. H. Amara, & N. Trumper-Hecht. (2006). Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. In D. Gorter (Ed.), Linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism (pp. 7–30). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Block, D., Gray, J., & Holbrow, M. (Eds.). (2013). Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics. Routledge.
Blommaert, J., Collins, J., & Slembrouck, S. (2005). Polycentricity and interactional regimes in ‘global neighborhoods’. Ethnography, 6(2), 205–235.
Bourdieu, P. (1971). Systems of education and systems of thought. Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education, 189–207.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2008). All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 401–431.
Cameron, D. (2000). Styling the worker: Gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of sociolinguistics, 4(3), 323–347.
Chua, B. H. (2006). Values and development in Singapore. In L. E. Harrison & P. L. Berger (Eds.), Developing cultures: Case studies (pp. 101–117). New York, NY: Routledge.
Chun, C. W. (2017). The discourses of capitalism: Everyday economists and the production of common sense. Taylor & Francis.
Duchêne, A., & Heller, M. (eds.). (2012). Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit (Vol. 11). Routledge.
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis: an overview. In T. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse and Interaction. London: Sage, 67–97.
Gatrell, J., Reid, N., & Steiger, T. L. (2018). Branding spaces: Place, region, sustainability and the American craft beer industry. Applied Geography, 901, 360–370.
Gram, M. (2007). Whiteness and Western values in global advertisements: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 13(4), 291–309.
Hall, K. (2014). Hypersubjectivity: Language, anxiety, and indexical dissonance in globalization. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 24(2), 261–273.
(2005). Intertextual sexuality: Parodies of class, identity, and desire in liminal Delhi. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 125–144.
(2009). Boys’ talk: Hindi, moustaches, and masculinity in New Delhi. In P. Pichler & E. Eppler (Eds.), Gender and spoken interaction (pp.139–162). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heller, M. (2011). Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. Oxford University Press.
(2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473–492.
Heller, M., Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2014). Introduction: Sociolinguistics and tourism–mobilities, markets, multilingualism. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(4), 425–458.
Irving, J. T., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities and identities, (pp. 35–84). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
Jaworski, A. (2015). Word cities and language objects: ‘Love’ sculptures and signs as shifters. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1), 75–94.
Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2010). Introducing semiotic landscapes. In A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space, (pp. 1–40). London: Continuum.
Kachru, B. B. (1992). Teaching world Englishes. The other tongue: English across cultures, 21, 355–365.
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of language and social psychology, 16(1), 23–49.
Mautner, G. (2010). Language and the market society: Critical reflections on discourse and dominance. Routledge.
Park, J. S. Y., & Wee, L. (2012). Markets of English: Linguistic capital and language policy in a globalizing world. New York: Routledge.
Pennycook, A. (2018). Linguistic Landscapes and Semiotic Assemblages. In M. Pütz & N. Mundt (Eds.) Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource (pp. 75–88). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Singapore Statutes Online (2010). Constitution of the Republic of Singapore. Attorney General’s Chamber Singapore, 2010, [URL] (accessed 15 July 2017).
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
Shohamy, E. G., Ben Rafael, E., & Barni, M. (Eds.). (2010). Linguistic Landscape in the City. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. (2009). Introduction. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Routledge.
Silverstein, M. (1977). Cultural prerequisites to grammatical analysis. Linguistics and Anthropology: Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, 1977, 139–51.
(2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & communication, 23(3), 193–229.
Simpson, W. (2018). Neoliberal fetishism: The language learner as homo œconomicus. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(5), 507–519.
Springer, S. (2012). Neoliberalism as discourse: between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism. Critical discourse studies, 9(2), 133–147.
Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S. (2009). Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, mobility and space in a South African township. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 363–386.
Sweetser, E. E. (1988). Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 141, 389–405.
Tan, P. K. (2014). Singapore’s balancing act, from the perspective of the linguistic landscape. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 29(2), 438–466.
Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R. and Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Zhao, S. & Baldauf Jr., R. B. (2012). Individual agency in language planning: Chinese script reform as a case study. Language problems and language planning, 36(1), 1–24.
