Article published In: Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 7:1 (2021) ► pp.60–85
Sitting on the fence
A geosemiotic analysis of school perimeters
Published online: 21 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.19024.sym
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.19024.sym
Abstract
Analysis of the Linguistic Landscape of schools has by and large concentrated on that in classrooms rather than that mounted on their boundaries, on their perimeter architecture. In the last decade, this architecture has become a rich site for semiotic expression, where schools project not just their own brand but also that of enterprises that sponsor and support them. Following an extensive analysis of the advertisements, signs, and banners around schools located in the inner-west of Sydney, Australia, this paper argues that their presence is emblematic of the neo-liberalist imperatives that now impel education and that is evident in the need for government schools to bolster their income streams and student enrolments. Hence comes the pressure for schools to advertise their qualities and attraction to their communities using a range of semiotic devices, including electronic message boards.
Résumé
L’analyse du paysage linguistique des écoles s’est pour l’essentiel concentrée sur celui des salles de classe et non sur celui les délimitant, leur architecture périmétrique. Au cours des dix dernières années, cette architecture est devenue un site riche en expression sémiotique : les écoles y projettent non seulement leur propre image, mais aussi celle des entreprises qui les parrainent et les soutiennent. Après une analyse approfondie des publicités, enseignes et banderoles des écoles situées dans la région Inner West de la ville de Sydney, en Australie, cet article soutient que leur présence est emblématique des impératifs néolibéralistes qui impactent désormais l’enseignement, ce qui se reflète de façon marquée par la nécessité des écoles publiques de multiplier leurs flux de recettes et les inscriptions d’étudiants. Ces impératifs expliquent la pression exercée sur les écoles pour que celles-ci promeuvent leurs qualités et leur attrait auprès de leurs communautés à travers différents dispositifs sémiotiques, dont les panneaux d’affichage électroniques.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A brief excursus on policy
- 3.Method of investigation
- 4.Remote control
- 5.Border crossings
- 6.Noticing schools
- 7.On and off the rails
- 8.Not sitting on the fence
- 9.Discussion and conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (69)
Alderman, D. H. (2002). School names as cultural arenas: the naming of U.S. Public Schools after Martin Luther King, Jr., Urban Geography, 27(3), 601–626.
Austin, J. & Hickey, A. (2008). Signing the school in neo-liberal times: the public pedagogy of being pedagogically public, The International Journal of Learning, 15 (1), 194–202.
Baker, J. & Gladstone, N. (2019). ‘No time to be kids’: the students travelling 100kms a day to attend a selective school, The Sydney Morning Herald, 17 November.
Ball, S. & Youdell, D. (2008). Hidden privatisation in education. Brussels: Education International.
Baroutsis, A. (2016). Media accounts of school performance: reinforcing dominant practices of accountability, Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 567–582.
Bounds, M. & Morris, A. (2006). Second wave gentrification in inner-city Sydney, Cities, 23(2), 99–108.
Brown, K. D. (2012). The linguistic landscape of educational spaces: language revitalisation and schools in southeastern Estonia. In Gorter, D., Marten, H. F. & Van Mensel, I. (Eds.) Minority languages in the linguistic landscape. (pp. 281–298). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Burnswoods, J. and Fletcher, J. (1980). Sydney and the bush: a pictorial history of education in New South Wales. Sydney: New South Wales Department of Education.
Burwell, C. and Lenters, K. (2015). Word on the street: investigating linguistic landscapes with urban Canadian youth, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(3), 201–221.
Caldwell, B. J. (2010). Is private schooling becoming the preferred the model of school choice in education, Journal of School Choice, 41: 378–397.
Cucchiara, M. (2008). Re-branding urban schools: urban revitalization, social status, and marketing public schools to the upper middle class, Journal of Education Policy, 23(2), 165–179.
Dowling, J. (2019). Drivers record a fail when it comes to school zones. The Sydney Morning Herald, August 12.
Dressler, R. (2015). “Signgeist: promoting bilingualism through the linguistic landscape of school signage”, International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(1), 128–145.
Fuller, G. (2002). The arrow – directional semiotics: wayfinding in transit, Social Semiotics, 12(3), 231–244.
Goffman, E. (1968). Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Gorter, D. (2018). Linguistic landscapes and trends in the study of schoolscapes, Linguistics and Education, 441, 80–85.
Hancock, A. (2012). Capturing the linguistic landscape of Edinburgh: a pedagogical tool to investigate student teachers’ understandings of cultural and linguistic diversity. In Hélot, C., Barni, M., Janssens, R. & Bagna, C. (eds), Linguistic Landscapes, Multilingualism and Social Change. (pp. 249–266). Frankfurt: Peter Lang, Frankfurt.
Hickey, A. (2010). When the street becomes a pedagogue. In Sandlin, J. A., Schultz, B. D. and Burdick, J. (Eds.) Handbook of public pedagogy: education and learning beyond schooling. (pp.161–170). New York: Routledge.
Jensen, O. B. (2013). Mobile semiotics. In Adey, P., Bissell, D., Hannam, K., Merriman, P. & Sheller, M. (Eds.) The Routledge handbook of mobilities. (pp.566–574). London: Routledge.
Johnson, N. B. (1980). The material culture of public school classrooms: the symbolic integration of local schools and national culture. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 11(3), 173–190.
Juhlin, O. & Normark, D. (2008). Public road signs as intermediate interaction, Space and Culture, 11(4), 383–408.
Kallen, J. L. (2010). Changing landscapes: language, space and policy in the Dublin linguistic landscape. In Jaworksi, A. & Thurlow, C. (Eds.) Semiotic landscapes: language, image, space. (pp.41–58). London: Continuum.
Keller, D. B. (2006). Hidden curriculum in school signage, International Journal of Applied Semiotics, 5(1–2), 185–191.
Kenway, J. (2013). Challenging inequality in Australian schools: Gonski and beyond, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 286–308.
Kinneir, J. (1980). Words and the buildings: the art and practice of public lettering. London: The Architectural Press.
Latour, B. & Hermant, E. (2006). Paris: invisible city. Trans. by Liz Carey-Libbrecht. Paris: Bruno Latour.
Lou, J. J. (2010). Chinese on the side: the marginalization of Chinese in the linguistic and social landscapes of Chinatown in Washington, DC. In Shohamy, E., Ben-Rafael, E. & Barni, M. (Eds.) Linguistic landscape in the city. (pp.96–114). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
(2016). The linguistic landscape of Chinatown: a sociolinguistic ethnography. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Maddox, M. (2014). Taking God to school: the end of Australia’s egalitarian education? Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
Malinowski, D. (2009). Authorship in the linguistic landscape: a multimodal-performative view. In Shohamy, E. & Gorter, D. (ed.) Linguistic landscape: expanding the scenery. (pp.107–125). New York: Routledge, 2009.
Metro-Rolland, Michelle M. (2011). Tourists, signs and the city: the semiotics of culture in an urban landscape. Farnham: Ashgate.
Neethling, B. (2015). Street names: a changing urban landscape. In Hough, C. (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of names and naming. (pp.151–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Przymus, S. D. (2017). The subliminal influence of streetsigns in schoolscapes: elective vs. circumstantial indexicality in a tale of two Tucsons. Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching. 241, 4–24.
Przymus, S. D. and Kohler, A. T. (2018). SIGNS: uncovering the mechanisms by which messages in the linguistic influence language/race ideologies and educational opportunities. Linguistics and Education, 441, 58–68.
Puzey, G. (2015). Linguistic landscapes. In Hough, C. (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of names and naming. (pp.396–409). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reid, A. (2019). Changing Australian education: how policy is taking us backwards and what can be done about it. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Rockwell, E. (2005). Walls, fences and keys: the enclosure of rural indigenous schools. In Lawn, M. & Grosvenor, I. (Eds.) Materialities of schooling: design-technology-objects-routines. (pp.19–45). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Rose-Redwood, R. (2009). Indexing the great ledger of the community: urban house numbering, city directories and the production of spatial legibility. In Berg, L. & Vuolteenaho, J. (Eds.) Critical toponymies: the contested politics of place naming. (pp. 199–225). Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.
Rose-Redwood, R., Alderman, D. & Azaryhu, M. (2010). Geographies of toponymic inscription: new direction in critical place-name studies, Progress in Human Geography, 34(4), 453–470.
Savela, T. (2018). The advantages and disadvantages of quantitative methods in schoolscape research. Linguistics and Education, 44(3), 31–44.
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: language in the material world. London: Routledge.
Sculle, K. A. & Jakle, J. A. (2008). Signs in motion: a dynamic agent in landscape and place, Journal of Cultural Geography, 25 (1), 57–85.
Sebba, M. (2010). Discourses in transit. In Jaworksi, A. & Thurlow, C. (Eds.) Semiotic landscapes: language, image, space. (pp.59–76). London: Continuum.
Sherington, G. & Campbell, Craig (2004). Australian Liberalism, the middle class and public education: from Henry Parkes to John Howard, Education Research and Perspectives, 31 (2): 59–77.
Siegert, B. (2015). Cultural techniques: grid, filters, doors, and other articulations of the real. New York: Fordham University Press.
Smith, C., Parr, N. and Muhidin, S. (2019). Mapping school’s NAPLAN results: a spatial inequality of school outcomes in Australia, Geographical Research, 57(2), 133–150.
Staiger, A. (2005). School walls as battle grounds: technologies of power, space and identity. Pedagogica Historica, 41(4–5), 555–569.
Synott, J. & Symes, C. (1995). The genealogy of the school: an iconography of badges and mottoes, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(2), 139–152.
Szabó, T. P. (2015). The management of diversity in schoolscapes: an analysis of Hungarian practices. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 9(1), 23–51.
Tufi, S. & Blackwood, R. (2010). Trademarks in the linguistic landscape: methodological and theoretical challenges in the qualifying brand names in the public space. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(3), 197–210.
Van Mensel, L., Vandebroucke, M. & Blackwood, R. (2016). Linguistic landscapes. In Garcia, O., Flores, N. & Spotti, M. (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of language and society. (pp.423–449). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wagner, A. (2006). The rules of the road, a universal visual semiotics, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 191, 311–324.
Walker, J. C. & Crump, S. (1996). Real choice in education: public interest, state control and private freedom, Unicorn, 22(4), 24–38.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Liu, Nancy & Roswita Dressler
Symes, Colin
Symes, Colin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
