Article published In: Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 5:3 (2019) ► pp.217–247
The landscape returns the gaze
Bikescapes and the new economies
Published online: 12 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18027.pen
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18027.pen
Abstract
This paper looks at bikescapes – and particularly dockless share bikes – with a focus on their rapid proliferation
and subsequent partial demise in Sydney. Four principal themes emerged from this study: first, bikes are an important part of the
cityscape, and studies of urban semiotics need to take greater account of modes of transport. Second, the rise of docked and
dockless share bikes has changed the ways the city is felt and perceived: as bikes circulate within the city, these shifting
bikescapes make visible changes to the physical city environment. The ebb and flow of dockless bikes – from neat alignments to
dispersed arrangements – provide an insight into changing patterns of work, leisure, and mobility, and present entropic rather
than ordered city processes. Third, these bikes became significant discourse markers, material artefacts where discourses of
consumption, convenience, contamination, and co-operation intersect. Dockless share bikes sit at the hub of a tussle over public
and private ownership of space and information, in terms both of their physical incursion into public space and as syphons of
personal information. Finally, they suggest not only that aspects of the cityscape may play an active role in semiotic networks,
but that the semiotic landscape may be returning our gaze.
Résumé
Cet article examine les « paysages cyclistes » – et en particulier ceux des vélos flottants – en mettant
l’accent sur leur prolifération rapide et leur disparition partielle à Sydney. Quatre thèmes principaux ressortent de cette étude:
premièrement, le vélo est une partie importante du paysage urbain et les études sur la sémiotique urbaine doivent prendre
davantage en compte les modes de transport. Deuxièmement, la montée en puissance des vélos flottants a changé la manière dont une
ville est ressentie et perçue: à mesure que les vélos circulent en ville, ces paysages cyclistes changeants modifient de manière
visible l’environnement physique de la ville. Le va-et-vient des vélos – depuis les alignements soignés jusqu’aux arrangements
dispersés – permet de mieux comprendre l’évolution des modes de travail, des loisirs et de la mobilité, ainsi que les processus
entropiques plutôt qu’ordonnés de la ville. Troisièmement, ces vélos sont devenus des marqueurs de discours importants, des
artefacts matériels où se croisent les discours sur la consommation, la facilité, la contamination et la coopération. Les vélos
flottants sont au centre des luttes entre propriété publique et propriété privée pour l’espace et pour l’information, par leur
incursion physique dans l’espace public et en tant que pompes d’informations personnelles. Enfin, ils suggèrent non seulement que
certains aspects du paysage urbain peuvent jouer un rôle actif dans les réseaux sémiotiques, mais également que le paysage
sémiotique peut nous retourner son regard.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: The landscape as a semiotic assemblage
- 2.Methodology: Radical Vélography
- 3.Reading bikes
- 4.Order and disorder
- 5.Bikes as discourse markers
- 6.Data-gathering and city bikes
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (72)
Barni, M. and Bagna, C. (2015). The critical turn in LL: New methodologies and new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape 1(1/2): 6–18.
Bailey, M. (2017). Obike, Reddy Go are more than bike-sharing companies. Financial Review [URL]
Block, D. (2018). Political economy and sociolinguistics: Neoliberalism, inequality and social class. London: Bloomsbury.
Bordenkircher, B. and O’Neil, R. (2018). Dockless Bikes: Regulation Breakdown. Chicago: Twelve Tone Consulting.
China Daily (2017). China’s ‘four great new inventions’ in modern times [URL]
Choo, C. (2018). New licensing regime for bike-sharing operators to kick in from October: MOT. [URL]
City of Sydney (2018). Guidelines for bikeshare operators. [URL]
Crommelin, L., Troy, L., Martin, C. and Parkinson, S. (2018). Technological disruption in private housing markets: the case of Airbnb, AHURI Final Report 305, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited, Melbourne, [URL],
Crunchbase (2018). [URL]
Dardot, P. and Laval, C. (2009). La nouvelle raison du monde: Essai sur la société néolibérale. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
Donohue, R. (2017). Breaking the cycle. The Saturday Paper, November 11, 2017. [URL]
Eddie, R. (2018). Dockless share bikes impounded from Sydney beaches. [URL]
Farivar, C. (2018). Habeas data: Privacy versus the rise of surveillance tech. New York: Melville House.
Farrelly, E. (2018). Data harvesters take us for a sinister ride. The Sydney Morning Herald, News Review, March 10–11, p.30.
Fishman, E., Washington, S. and Haworth, N. (2013). Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature, Transport Reviews, 33(2): 148–165.
Fiske, J., Turner, G. and Hodge, B. (1987). Myths of Oz: reading Australian popular culture. Sydney, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
Flubacher, M.-C. and Del Percio, A. (Eds.) (2018). Language, Education and Neoliberalism: Marketization, dispossession, and subversion. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Gorrey, M. (2018). Bump in the road as bike share operators Reddy Go, ofo quit Sydney. [URL]
Gorter, D. and Cenoz, J. (2015). Translanguaging and linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape 1(1/2): 54–74.
Gottdiener, M. (1983). Urban semiotics. In S. Pipkin, M. La Gory, and J. Blau (Eds) Remaking the city: Social science perspectives on urban design (pp. 101–114). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hamilton, L. and Taylor, N. (2017). Ethnography after humanism: Power, politics and method in multi-species research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Han Sun Sheng (2017). Bike sharing schemes might seem like a waste of space but the economics makes sense. [URL]
Hiramoto, M. (2015). Inked nostalgia: displaying identity through tattoos as Hawaii local practice, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36 (2): 107–123.
Hu, W. (2017). More New Yorkers opting for life in the bike lane. New York Times, July 30th, 2017. [URL]
Igo, S. (2018). The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Karlander, D. (2018). Backjumps: writing, watching, erasing train graffiti, Social Semiotics, 28(1) 41–59.
Kell, C. (2015). “Making people happen”: materiality and movement in meaning-making trajectories. Social Semiotics, 25 (4): 423–445.
Kitis, E. D. and Milani, T. (2015). The performativity of the body: Turbulent spaces in Greece. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3): 268–290.
Kramsch, C. (2014). A researcher’s auto-socioanalysis: making space for the personal. In B. Spolsky, Inbar-Lourie and M. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Challenges for language education and policy: making space for people (pp. 235–244). New York: Routledge.
Karaçor, E. K. (2016). Public vs. Private: The evaluation of different space types in terms of publicness dimension. European Journal of Sustainable Development (2016), 5(3): 51–58.
Larmer, B. (2017). China’s Revealing Spin on the ‘Sharing Economy’ [URL]
Makoni, S. and Makoni, B. (2010). Multilingual discourses on wheels and public English in Africa: A case for ‘vague linguistique’. In J. Maybin & J. Swann (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to English Language Studies (pp. 258–270). London: Routledge.
May, S. (2019). Negotiating the multilingual turn in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 1031: 122–129.
Myurbo (2018). [URL]
Nemeth, J. (2009). Defining a public: The management of privately owned public space. Urban Studies, 46(11): 2463–2490.
Newens, C. (2017). Véliberté, egalité, fraternité: is Paris’s seminal bike share scheme out of date? [URL]
Ofo (2018). [URL]
Palin, M. (2017). Dockless rental bikes to burst onto the scene in Australian cities. [URL]
Peck, A. and Stroud, C. (2015). Skinscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2): 133–151.
Pennycook, A. (2009). Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti. In Elana Shohamy and Durk Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, edited (pp. 302–312). Abingdon: Routledge.
(2010). Spatial narrations: Graffscapes and city souls. In A. Jaworski and C. Thurlow (Eds) Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, (pp. 137–150). London: Continuum.
(2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3): 269–282.
(2015b). Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3): 191–212.
(2017). Fish, phone cards and semiotic assemblages in two Bangladeshi shops in Sydney and Tokyo, Social Semiotics, 27(4): 434–450.
Ravelli, L. and McMurtrie, R. (2016). Multimodality in the built environment: Spatial discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
Scholz, T. (2016). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Schor, J. B. and Attwood-Charles, W. (2017). The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality and sociability on for-profit platforms. Sociology Compass, 2017, 11, e12493.
Schor, J. B., & Fitzmaurice, C. J. (2015). Collaborating and Connecting: The emergence of the sharing economy. In L. Reisch and J. Thogersen, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption (pp. 410–425). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., & Zhang, H. (2010). Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record 21431, 159–167.
Shaw, B. (2017). Posthuman urbanism: Mapping bodies in contemporary city space. New York: Routledge.
Shohamy, E. (2015). LL research as expanding language and language policy. Linguistic Landscape 1(1/2) 152–171.
Shohamy, A. and Ben-Rafael, E. (2015). Introduction: Linguistic landscape, a new journal. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2): 1–5.
Small, A. (2018). Ofo Beats a Retreat From the Dockless Bikesharing Battle [URL]
Sumpter, D. (2018). Outnumbered: Exploring the Algorithms that Control Our Lives. London: Bloomsbury.
Sundararajan, A. (2016). The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Taylor, A. (2018). The Bike-Share Oversupply in China: Huge Piles of Abandoned and Broken Bicycles. [URL]
Thurlow, C. (2016). Queering critical discourse studies or/and performing ‘post-class’ ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(5), 485–514.
Yang, Y. (2018). Singapore requires ‘geofencing’ for all bike-sharing operators in the city by the end of this year. [URL]
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Nguyen, Ha, Christina Higgins & Kaiwipunikauikawēkiu Punihei Lipe
Pan, Zhaoyi
Lamb, Gavin
2024. Multispecies language landscapes. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 10:4 ► pp. 370 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
