Article published In: Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 4:1 (2018) ► pp.1–28
Emplacing hate
Turbulent graffscapes and linguistic violence in post-war Bosnia-Herzegovina
Published online: 26 March 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.17011.bil
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.17011.bil
Abstract
In Bosnia-Herzegovina, the 1992–1995 war is the foundation on which its citizens are building their future. Contested spaces marked by violence are (re)created by means of graffiti frequently conveying locally hegemonic (re)narrations of legitimacy and attestation. Following the lead of scholars like Wee, L. (2016). Situating affect in linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 2(2): 105–126. , Stroud, C. (2016). Turbulent Linguistic Landscapes and the Semiotics of Citizenship. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 3–18). London, New York: Bloomsburry., Rubdy, R. & Ben Said, S. (Eds.). (2015). Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic landscape. London: Palgrave Macmillan. , this paper scrutinizes how the ongoing struggles of Bosnia-Herzegovina are constituted and sustained through/in the intersection of language and space. The first set of analysed graffiti is taken from an online database and the second is collected during fieldwork in areas where territorial status is especially fraught. I offer a three-part analysis of the key ways explicitly partisan and sometimes intimidating messages are realized through the subtle interplay of semiotic and spatial resources. Turbulent graffscapes (Stroud, C. (2016). Turbulent Linguistic Landscapes and the Semiotics of Citizenship. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 3–18). London, New York: Bloomsburry.) of Bosnia-Herzegovina are materializations of linguistic violence (Tirrell, L. (2012). Genocidal Language Game. In I. Maitra & M. K. McGowan (Eds.), Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech (pp. 174–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.), generating hateful places which sustain and potentially deepen social tensions between ethnic groups.
Hrvatski
U Bosni i Hercegovini, ratni period 1992–1995 je osnov na kojem njeni građani temelje svoju budućnost. Kontestirani prostori obilježeni nasiljem su (re)kreirani kroz grafite koji često prenose lokalno hegemonijske (re)naracije o legitimnosti i ovjeravanju. Slijedom vodstva naučnika kao što su Wee, L. (2016). Situating affect in linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 2(2): 105–126. , Stroud, C. (2016). Turbulent Linguistic Landscapes and the Semiotics of Citizenship. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 3–18). London, New York: Bloomsburry., te Rubdy, R. & Ben Said, S. (Eds.). (2015). Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic landscape. London: Palgrave Macmillan. , ovaj rad istražuje kako se trenutne borbe Bosne i Hercegovine konstituiraju i održavaju kroz/u raskrižje(u) jezika i prostora. Prva grupa analiziranih grafita je preuzeta iz internet baze podataka, dok je druga prikupljena tijekom terenskog rada u područjima gdje je teritorijalni status naročito problematičan. Rad prikazuje trodijelnu analizu ključnih načina na koji su eksplicitno pristrane i ponekad zastrašujuće poruke ostvarene kroz suptilnu interakciju semiotičkih i prostornih resursa. Turbulentni pejzaži grafita (Stroud, C. (2016). Turbulent Linguistic Landscapes and the Semiotics of Citizenship. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 3–18). London, New York: Bloomsburry.) Bosne i Hercegovine su materijalizacija lingvističkog nasilja (Tirrell, L. (2012). Genocidal Language Game. In I. Maitra & M. K. McGowan (Eds.), Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech (pp. 174–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.), te stvaraju mjesta mržnje koja održavaju i potencijalno produbljuju društvene napetosti prisutne između etničkih skupina.
Article outline
- 1.Setting the scene: The beginnings of violence
- 2.Turbulent graffscapes: Moving beyond words and beyond “hate speech”
- 3.Graffscapes and/as linguistic violence: Innerspaces, banal spaces, restricted spaces
- a.The graffiti of innerspaces – Turf wars
- b.Graffiti in banal spaces – Everyday provocations
- c.Graffiti in restricted spaces – Bold incursions
- 4.Conclusion: “The war is not over”
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (41)
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M. H. & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 311: 7–30.
Brave Heart, M. Y. H. & DeBruyn, L. M. (1998). The American Indian Holocaust: healing historical unresolved grief. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 8(2): 56–78.
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York and London: Routledge.
Chick, J. K. (1985). The interactional accomplishment of discrimination in South Africa. Language in Society, 141: 299–326.
Colaguori, C. (2010). Symbolic Violence and the Violation of Human Rights: Continuing the Sociological Critique of Domination. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 3(2): 388–400.
Cresswell, T. & Martin, C. (2012). On turbulence: Entanglements of disorder and order on a Devon beach. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 1031: 516–529.
De Ruiter, A. (2015). Imaging Egypt’s political transition in (post-)revolutionary street art: on the interrelations between social media and graffiti as media of communication. Media, Culture & Society, 37(4): 581–601.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge.
Hanauer, D. I. (2011). The discursive construction of the separation wall at Abu Dis Graffiti as political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 10(3): 301–321.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social-Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge.
Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
Landry, R. & Bourhis, R. (1997). Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1): 23–49.
Ley, D. & Cybriwsky, R. (1974). Urban Graffiti as Territorial Markers. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64(4): 491–505.
Lynn, N. & Lea, S. J. (2005). Racist graffiti: Text, context and social comment. Visual Communication, 4(1): 39–63.
McCormick, R. (2014). Croatia Under Ante Pavelic: America, the Ustase and Croatian Genocide. I. B. Tauris.
Moreau, T. & Alderman, D. K. (2011). Graffiti hurts and the eradication off alternative landscape expression. The Geographical Review, 101(1): 106–124.
Pennycook, A. (2010). Spatial narrations: Graffscapes and city souls. In A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: language, image, space (pp. 137–150). London: Continuum.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. M. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4): 741–763.
Rubdy, R. & Ben Said, S. (Eds.). (2015). Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic landscape. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rubdy, R. (2015). A Multimodal Analysis of the Graffiti Commemorating the 26/11 Mumbai Terror Attacks: Constructing Self-Understandings of a Senseless Violence. In R. Rubdy & S. Ben Said (Eds.), Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic landscape (pp. 280–303). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schmidt, B. E. & Schroder, I. W. (Eds.). (2001). Anthropology of Violence and Conflict. London: Routledge.
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.
Smith, A. (2014). Drawing the line in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The advocacy of hatred constituting incitement to hostility, discrimination and violence. Analitika, Center for Social Research.
Stroud, C. (2016). Turbulent Linguistic Landscapes and the Semiotics of Citizenship. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 3–18). London, New York: Bloomsburry.
Tirrell, L. (2012). Genocidal Language Game. In I. Maitra & M. K. McGowan (Eds.), Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech (pp. 174–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thurlow, C. (2001). Naming the ‘outside within’: Homophobic pejorative and the verbal abuse of LGB high-school pupils. Journal of Adolescence, 24(1), 25–38.
Wee, L. (2016). Situating affect in linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 2(2): 105–126.
West, R. (1993). Tito and the rise and fall of Yugoslavia. Journal of Croatian Studies, 351: 235–251.
Whitehead, N. L. (2004). Cultures, Conflicts and the Poetics of Violent Practice. In N. L. Whitehead (Ed.), Violence (pp. 3–24). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Wilson, J. Z. (2014). Ambient Hate: Racist Graffiti and Social Apathy in a Rural Community. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 53(4):377–394.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Baranova, Vlada
2024. The Linguistic Landscape of the war. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 10:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Byrne, Steven & Erika Marcet
Morlan, Marguerite & Steven Byrne
Malloy, Connor
2023. Does the Linguistic Landscape influence happiness?. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 9:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Volvach, Natalia
2023. Manoeuvres of dissent in landscapes of annexation. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 9:2 ► pp. 113 ff.
Modan, Gabriella & Katie J. Wells
Tyran, Katharina
Ajšić, Adnan
Kosatica, Maida
Kosatica, Maida
2024. Semiotic landscape in a green capital. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 10:2 ► pp. 136 ff.
Albuquerque, Davi & Nuno Carlos Almeida
Themistocleous, Christiana
2020. Multilingual voices of unification in ‘No man’s land’. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 6:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
