Article published In: Methodology in Linguistic Landscape Research
Edited by Robert Blackwood
[Linguistic Landscape 3:3] 2017
► pp. 306–326
Inclusive ethnographies
Beyond the binaries of observer and observed in linguistic landscape studies
Published online: 19 January 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.17008.sza
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.17008.sza
Abstract
In ethnographically oriented linguistic landscape studies, social spaces are
studied in co-operation with research participants, many times through mobile
encounters such as walking. Talking, walking, photographing and video recording
as well as writing the fieldwork diary are activities that result in the
accumulation of heterogeneous, multimodal corpora. We analyze data from a
Hungarian school ethnography project to reconstruct fieldwork encounters and
analyze embodiment, the handling of devices (e.g. the photo camera) and verbal
interaction in exploratory, participant-led walking tours. Our analysis shows
that situated practices of embodied conduct and verbal interaction blur the
boundaries between observation and observers, and thus LL research is not only
about space- and place-making and sense-making routines, but the fieldwork
encounters are also transformative and contribute to space- and place-making
themselves. Our findings provide insight for ethnographic researchers and enrich
the already robust qualitative and quantitative strategies employed in the
field.
Magyar
A nyelvi tájképet vizsgáló etnográfiai kutatásokban a közösségi tereket a
kutatásban részt vevő személyekkel együttműködve vizsgálják, gyakran mozgás,
például séta közben. A beszéd, a séta, a fényképezés, illetve videózás mint
társas tevékenységek eredményeként heterogén, multimodális korpuszok jönnek
létre. Tanulmányunkban egy magyarországi iskolai etnográfiai projekt anyagait
elemezzük abból a célból, hogy rekonstruáljuk, hogyan befolyásolják a kutatóval
tett, de a kutatásban részt vevő személy által vezetett felfedező séták a
kutatás menetét. Részletesen elemezzük ebből a szempontból az embodiment, a
fényképezőgép-kezelés és a verbális interakció szerepét. Amellett érvelünk, hogy
a közös felfedező sétákhoz köthető embodiment, fényképezőgép-használat és
verbális interakció elmossák a megfigyelő és a megfigyelt közötti határokat, így
a nyelvi tájkép kutatása nemcsak tárgyát tekintve szól tér- és helyteremtésről,
hanem transzformatív jellege révén a kutatás maga is alakítja e folyamatokat.
Eredményeink az etnográfiai vizsgálatok egyes jellegzetességeinek feltárásán túl
a nyelvi tájkép kutatására már rendelkezésre álló kvalitatív és kvantitatív
módszerek gazdagításához is hozzájárul.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: LL studies and inclusive ethnographies
- 2.Walking and LL studies
- 3.A schoolscape ethnography project
- 3.1Agency and schoolscape in focus
- 3.2The wider societal context
- 3.3On the fieldwork setting
- 3.4Tourist guide technique: A type of walking interviews
- 4.Analysis
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Link to the online appendices
References
References (47)
Aiestaran, J., Cenoz, J. & Gorter, D. (2010). Multilingual cityscapes. In E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape in the City (pp. 219–234). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Anderson, J. (2004). Talking whilst walking: A geographical archaeology of
knowledge. Area, 36(3), 254–261.
Aro, M. (2012). Effects of authority: Voicescapes in children’s beliefs about the
learning of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22 (3), 331–346.
Baynham, M. (2010). Stance, positioning, and alignment in narratives of professional
experience. Language in Society, 401, 63–74.
Barker, V. & Giles, H. (2002). Who supports the English-only movement? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23(5), 353–370.
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Bradley, J. (2016). Liquid Methodologies: using a linguistic ethnographic approach to
study multilingual phenomena. Working Papers in Translanguaging and Translation, 181. [URL]
Brown, K. D. (2012). The linguistic landscape of educational spaces. In D. Gorter, H. F. Marten, & L. V. Mensel (Eds.), Minority Languages in the Linguistic Landscape (pp. 281–298). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, L. & Durrheim, K. (2009). Different kinds of knowing: Generating qualitative data through
mobile interviewing. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(5), 911–930.
Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2016). Embodied sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates (pp. 173–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cloke, P. J., Cook, I., Crang, Ph., Goodwin, M., Painter, J. & Philo, Ch. (2004). Practising Human Geography. London: SAGE.
Dagenais, D., Moore, D., Sabatier, C., Lamarre, P., & Armand, F. (2009). Linguistic landscape and language awareness. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery (pp. 253–269). New York: Routledge.
Evans, J. & Jones, P. (2011). The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and
place. Applied Geography, 31(2), 849–858.
Facer, K. & Enright, B. (2016). Creating Living Knowledge. Bristol: University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities.
Gál, J. Z. (2014). Tan, rend [Discipline, order]. Vasárnapi Hírek [Sunday News], Aug 31st. [URL]
Garvin, R. (2010). Responses to the linguistic landscape in Memphis, Tennessee: An
urban space in Transition. In E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape in the City (pp. 252–271). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Guilat, Y. (2016). Redefining the Public Space as a Semiotic Resource through
Institutional Art Events. In R. J. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 163–180). London: Bloomsbury.
Jaspers, J. & Vershueren, J. (Eds.) 2011. Multilingual structures and agencies. A special issue for Journal of Pragmatics 43(5), 1157–1287.
Kitis, D. E. & Milani, T. M. (2015). The performativity of the body. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3), 268–290.
Knoblauch, H., Schnettler, B., & Raab, J. (2012). Video-Analysis: Methodological Aspects of Interpretive
Audiovisual Analysis in Social Research. In H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, & H. Soeffner (Eds.), Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods: Qualitative Audiovisual Data
Analysis in Sociology, 3rd ed (pp. 9–26). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street Phenomenology. The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research
Tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485.
Laihonen, P. (2008). Language ideologies in interviews: A conversation analysis
approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(5), 668–693.
Laihonen, P. & Szabó, T. P. (2017). Investigating visual practices in educational settings:
schoolscapes, language ideologies and organizational
cultures. In M. Martin-Jones & D. Martin (Eds.), Researching multilingualism: Critical and ethnographic
approaches (pp. 121–138). New York: Routledge.
Landry, R. & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.
Lou, J. J. (2016). The Linguistic Landscape of Chinatown: A Sociolinguistic
Ethnography. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Malinowski, D. (2009). Authorship in the linguistic landscape: A multimodal-performative
view. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery (pp. 107–125). New York: Routledge.
(2010). Showing seeing in the Korean linguistic cityscape. In E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape in the City (pp. 199–215). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Mondada, L. (2013). Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in
social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided
visits. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 597–626.
Moriarty, M. (2014). Languages in motion: Multilingualism and mobility in the
linguistic landscape. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(5), 457–463.
Pappenhangen, R., Scarvaglieri, C. & Redder, A. (2016). Expanding the Linguistic Landscape Scenery? Action theory and
‘Linguistic Soundscaping’. In R. J. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 147–162). London: Bloomsbury.
Peck, A. & Stroud, Ch. (2015). Skinskapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 133–151.
Pennycook, A. & Otsuji, E. (2015). Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 191–212.
Pink, S., Hubbard, P., O’Neill, M., & Radley, A. (2010). Walking across disciplines: From ethnography to arts
practice. Visual Studies, 25(1), 1–7.
Sannino, A. (2010). Teachers’ talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and
agency. Teaching and Teacher Education 261, 838–844.
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.
Stroud, Ch. (2016). Turbulent Linguistic Landscapes and the Semiotics of
Citizenship. In R. J. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 3–18). London: Bloomsbury.
Stroud, Ch., & Jegels, D. (2014). Semiotic landscapes and mobile narrations of place: Performing
the local. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2281, 179–199.
Stroud, Ch. & Mpendukana, S. (2009). Towards a material ethnography of linguistic
landscape. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 363–386.
Szabó, T. P. (2015). The Management of Diversity in Schoolscapes: An Analysis of
Hungarian Practices. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, 9(1), 23–51.
Troyer, R. A., Cáceda, C., & Giménez-Eguibar, P. (2015). Unseen Spanish in Small-Town America: A Minority Language in the
Linguistic Landscape. In R. Rudby & S. Ben Said (Eds.), Conflict, Exclusion and Dissent in the Linguistic Landscape (pp. 52–76). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Troyer, R. A. & Szabó, T. P. (2017). Representation and Videography in Linguistic Landscape
Studies. Linguistic Landscape, 3(1), 56–77.
Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change. Teaching and Teacher Education 471, 1–12.
Waksman, Sh. & E. Shohamy, (2016, April). Mediating LL: focus on tour guides. Presentation at the 8th Linguistic Landscapes International Workshop. University of Liverpool.
Cited by (26)
Cited by 26 other publications
Algrim, Jacob
Donnellan, Jonathan
Liao, Min-Hsiu, Katerina Strani & Eilidh Johnstone
Szabó, Tamás Péter & Petteri Laihonen
Abbass, Ghulam & Javanshir Shibliyev
Chimirala, Uma Maheshwari
Islam, Mohammad Shahidul
Mohr, Susanne
Volvach, Natalia
Laihonen, Petteri & Tamás Péter Szabó
López Vera, Mónica & Melinda Dooly
Malloy, Connor
2023. Does the Linguistic Landscape influence happiness?. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 9:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Marshall, Steve
Lou, Jackie Jia, David Malinowski & Amiena Peck
2022. The Linguistic Landscape of Covid-19. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 8:2-3 ► pp. 123 ff.
Yu, Yin
Álvarez-Mosquera, Pedro & Frieda Coetzee
Leimgruber, Jakob R. E. & Víctor Fernández-Mallat
Restrepo-Ramos, Falcon
2021. A changing landscape of voseo in
Medellín?. In Linguistic Landscape in the Spanish-speaking World [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 35], ► pp. 45 ff.
Restrepo-Ramos, Falcon
Savski, Kristof
2021. Language policy and linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 7:2 ► pp. 128 ff.
Szabó, Tamás Péter, Pamela Burnard, Anne Harris, Kristóf Fenyvesi, Gomathy Soundararaj & Tea Kangasvieri
Restrepo-Ramos, Falcon D.
2020. Public signage in a multilingual Caribbean enclave. In Current Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 27], ► pp. 273 ff.
Szabó, Tamás Péter & Hannele Dufva
Baudinette, Thomas
2018. Cosmopolitan English, traditional Japanese. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 4:3 ► pp. 238 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
