Article published In: Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 6:1 (2020) ► pp.80–103
Tempo and affect in the Linguistic Landscape
Published online: 16 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.00018.nie
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.00018.nie
Abstract
While the role of time and emotion have been acknowledged in linguistic and semiotic landscapes research, the
particular qualities of tempo and affect have rarely been discussed directly. This case study from an Italian-American festival in
South Philadelphia, a diverse and changing urban neighborhood, demonstrates how the two qualities work together to influence the
discursive construction of identity for residents as they interact with the space. Ethnographic observation and photographs from
the two days of the festival, as well as interviews with locals, frame the discussion of how to explore the landscape through this
lens. The paper encourages researchers to devote more attention to the abstract qualities of landscapes, and serves as a starting
point for critical examinations of a place and the distribution of capital among its occupants.
Résumé
Bien qu’on ait déjà reconnu l’importance du temps et de l’émotion dans le cadre des paysages linguistiques
et semiotiques, les qualités particulières de tempo et d’affect sont rarement discutées. Cette étude est née d’un festival
italo-américain à South Philadelphia, un quartier divers et en évolution, et montre comment ces deux qualités influencent ensemble
la construction discursive de l’identité des habitants lorsqu’ils interagissent avec l’espace. L’observation ethnographique et les
photos prises au cours du festival de deux jours, ainsi que des entretiens s, préconisent l’exploration des paysages sous cet
angle. L’article encourage les chercheurs à consacrer plus de leur attention aux qualités abstraites des paysages, et fournit un
point de départ pour une étude approfondie d’un endroit et de la distribution du capital parmi les habitants.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Tempo, affect and belonging in the Italian Market
- 3.Ethnography in flux
- 4.The role of discourses
- 5.Outside the Festival: Everyday tempos, power and borders
- 6.After affect: The opinions of residents
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (36)
Aronin, L., & Ó Laoire, M. (2013). The material culture of multilingualism: moving beyond the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(3), 225–235.
Backhaus, P. (2005). Signs of multilingualism in Tokyo – a diachronic look at the linguistic landscape. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2005 (175–176), 103–121.
Barad, Karen. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
(2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Bondi, L. (2004). Locating identity politics. In Keith, M. & Pile, S. (eds.). Place and the Politics of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Cronin, A. M. (2006). Advertising and the metabolism of the city: urban space, commodity rhythms. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 24.4(2006): 615–632.
de Saint-Georges, I. (2004). Materiality in discourse: The influence of space and layout in making meaning. In LeVine, P. & Scollon, R. (eds.). Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
DiPilla, M. (2016). South Philadelphia’s Little Italy and 9th Street Italian Market. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing.
Duff, C. (2010). On the role of affect and practice in the production of place. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 28.5(2010): 881–895.
Hult, F. M. (2009). Language ecology and linguistic landscape analysis. In Shohamy, E. & Gorter, D. (eds.). Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 88–104). Routledge.
Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual communication, 2(1), 29–57.
Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2010). Introducing semiotic landscapes. In ibid. (eds.). Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London: Continuum.
Labov, W. (2008). Mysteries of the substrate. In Meyerhoff, M. & Nagy, N. (eds.). Social lives in language-Sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities: Celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Luconi, S. (2001). From paesani to white ethnics: The Italian experience in Philadelphia. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Peck, A., & Banda, F. (2014). Observatory’s linguistic landscape: semiotic appropriation and the reinvention of space. Social semiotics, 24(3), 302–323.
Pile, S. (2010). Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 5–20.
Rubdy, R. (2015). Conflict and exclusion: The linguistic landscape as an arena of contestation. In Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic landscape (pp. 1–24). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Saverino, J. (2010). Mapping Memories in Stone: Italians and the Transformation of a Philadelphia Landscape. In Takenaka, A. & Osirim, M. J. (eds.). Global Philadelphia: Immigrant Communities Old and New. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the material world. New York: Routledge.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2007). Nexus analysis: Refocusing ethnography on action. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 608–625.
Seals, C. A. (2011). Reinventing the linguistic landscape of a national protest. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle, 21(1), 190–202.
Simpson, P. (2008). Chronic everyday life: Rhythmanalysing street performance. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(7), 807–829.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L. (eds.). Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Stanger-Ross, J. (2010). Staying Italian: Urban Change and Ethnic Life in Postwar Toronto and Philadelphia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S. (2009). Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, mobility and space in a South African township. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 363–386.
Stroud, C., & Jegels, D. (2014). Semiotic landscapes and mobile narrations of place: Performing the local. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2014(228), 179–199.
Troyer, R. A., & Szabó, T. P. (2017). Representation and videography in linguistic landscape studies. Linguistic Landscape, 3(1), 56–77.
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
United Merchants of the S. 9th Business Association. (2018). The South 9th Street Italian Market Festival. Retrieved July 18, 2018 from [URL]
Wee, L. (2016). Situating affect in linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 2 (2), 105-126.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Peltoniemi, Aaron Joshua, Tamás Péter Szabó & Raija Hämäläinen
2025. The tempo and presence of university students’ learning across schoolscapes. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 11:3 ► pp. 265 ff.
Guarín, Daniel
Li, Xiangyun & Qi Shen
Pienimäki, Hanna‐Mari, Tuomas Väisänen & Tuomo Hiippala
Yuan, Mingming
Niehaus, Konstantin
2023. The temporality of commodified landscapes at events & local constructions of identity in Salzburg. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 9:4 ► pp. 357 ff.
Lou, Jackie Jia, David Malinowski & Amiena Peck
2022. The Linguistic Landscape of Covid-19. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 8:2-3 ► pp. 123 ff.
Huebner, Thom
2021. Diaspora and Asian spaces in a transnational world. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 7:2 ► pp. 117 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
