Article published In: Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2009
General Editor: Jeroen van Craenenbroeck
[Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9] 2009
► pp. 205–240
Two locations for negation
Evidence from Kashmiri
Published online: 13 August 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.9.06mun
https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.9.06mun
Kashmiri has two structural positions for negation: a high position associated with focus and a low position associated with tense. In verb second environments, the difference between these two positions is neutralized on the surface and irrespective of the location where negation is generated, it appears as a suffix on the finite verb. But in non-verb second environments such as conditionals and correlatives the two negations can be teased apart. In these environments, the high negation appears as a suffix on material such as relative phrases and the conditional marker while the low negation appears as a suffix on the finite verb. The high vs. low distinction has semantic implications: in certain environments where the negation is arguably ‘expletive’, negation can only be high.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Borise, Lena, Andreas Pregla & Balázs Surányi
Gärtner, Hans‐Martin & Beáta Gyuris
Hsu, Brian
Manetta, Emily Walker
Sideltsev, Andrei
Sideltsev, Andrei V.
Sideltsev, Andrei V.
2019. Enclitic -(m)a ‘but’ / -(y)a ‘and’ in Hittite. In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348], ► pp. 245 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
