Article published In: Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2010
General Editor: Jeroen van Craenenbroeck
[Linguistic Variation Yearbook 10] 2010
► pp. 117–160
The subject agreement–accusative case connection in Turkish
Published online: 16 September 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.10.04kes
https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.10.04kes
This article is on the relationship between case and agreement. A noun phrase is assigned the structural case that it bears through agreement with a functional head. Several recent works assume this thesis, referred to as the George and Kornfilt Thesis, as a basic premise to provide an account of structural case assignment. The central thesis of the article is that there is at least one more dependency that needs to be assumed in case phenomena, namely that, in some languages of the world, structural object case, or more particularly accusative case, is dependent on subject agreement—the Subject Agreement–Accusative Case Conjecture. The article proposes the Jump-start Hypothesis in order to explain this dependency. According to this hypothesis, in a finite construction, case assignment to each argument is activated by a single source of agreement. The argumentation relies on data from Turkish nominalizations and restructuring infinitives.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Gündüz, Fikriye & Dilek Kocayanak
Özgen, Murat, Özlem Aktaş, Cansel Özgen, Öykün Yenal & Çağdaş Can Birant
Bayırlı, İsa Kerem
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
