Cover not available

In:The Expression of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality in Albert Camus’s L'Étranger and Its Translations / L'Étranger de Camus et ses traductions : questions de temps, d'aspect, de modalité et d'évidentialité (TAME): An empirical study / Etude empirique
Edited by Eric Corre, Danh Thành Do-Hurinville and Huy Linh Dao
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 35] 2020
► pp. 283–301

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 15
Modal verbs in L’Étranger and its Romance translations

Old problems and new perspectives

 | University of Murcia
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lis.35.15bra
Abstract
In this paper we compare L’Étranger to two Spanish translations in order to shed light on two theoretical issues. Firstly, the externalization problem (Laca, 2018): where do temporal and aspectual auxiliaries realize preferably in Sp. vs. Fr.? Are high perfects related to low perfects? Secondly, perfect tenses raise a problem when it comes to translate epistemic modal sentences from Fr. into Sp. In a configuration with a low perfect the modal may accept both the imparfait and the simple past. Each of the solutions has a particular contribution on discourse. Epistemic modals will also prove to serve both as a means to indirectly order the situations described in the foreground and to achieve the characteristic impression of vividness of L’Étranger due to their particular semantics.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Tenses and epistemic modal verbs
    • 2.1The linearization problem
    • 2.2The analysis: Predictions
  • 3.Tenses and epistemic modals in L’Étranger
    • 3.1Perfect linearizations
    • 3.2High and low perfects in context
      • 3.2.1French high perfects in context
      • 3.2.2Spanish low perfects in context
    • 3.3The stylistic import of epistemic tensed modals
  • 4.Other issues
    • 4.1Weak and strong necessity cross-linguistically
    • 4.2Modals added and modals suppressed
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (37)
References
Altshuler, D., & Varasdi, K. (2015). An argument for definitional adequacy of RESULT and NARRATION. Proceedings of SALT 25, (pp. 38–56). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1959). Les relations de temps dans le verbe français. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, LIV, 1, (pp. 69–82).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binnick, R. (1991). Time and the Verb. A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boogaart, R. (2007). The past and perfect of epistemic modals. In L. de Saussure, J. Moeschler, & G. Puskás (Eds.), Recent Advances in the Syntax and Semantics of Tense, Aspect and Modality, (pp. 47–69). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borgonovo, C. (2011). Modales ambiguos. Revue Romane 46(2), 202–221. Available online at Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, I., & Torrego, E. (1995). On Spanish HABER and Tense. Langues et Grammaire 1, 13–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrasco Gutiérrez, Á. (2018). On perfect(ive) morphology above and below modals. The H-ident hypothesis. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 17, 77–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, R. (1991). Tense in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Fernández, L. (2004). El pretérito imperfecto: repaso histórico y bibliográfico. In L. García Fernández y B. Camus Bergareche (Eds.) El pretérito imperfecto (pp. 13–95). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Fernández, L. (2008). Pretérito perfecto y pretérito anterior. In Á. Carrasco Gutiérrez (Ed.), Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas, (pp. 359–400). Madrid-Frankfurt: Iberoamericana. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, R. (1972). Figures III. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1993). The Diachronic Externalization of Inflection. Linguistics, 31.2, 279–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobbs, J. R. (1990). Literature and Cognition. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. R. (1966). Past tense replacement and the modal system. In J. McCawley (Ed), Notes from the linguistic underground (1976) (Syntax and Semantics 7), (pp. 85–100.) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1979). Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Discourse and Syntax (Syntax and Semantics, 12) (pp. 213–241). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (1973). Tense and Time Reference in Reduced Relative Clauses R. A. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 4, No. 2 (Spring, 1973), 251–256.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplansky, J. (2004). Outside The Stranger? English Retranslations of Camus’ L’ Étranger. Palimpsestes [en ligne], 15, 187–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laca, B. (2005). Tiempo, aspecto y la interpretación de los verbos modales en español. Lingüística 17, 9–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). On modal tenses and tensed modals. In Ch. Nishida & C. Russi (Eds.), Building a bridge between linguistic communities of the Old and the New World. Current research in tense, aspect, mood and modality. Cahiers Chronos 25 (pp. 163–198). Amsterdam: Rodopi. (Available online at〈halshs-00323340v2〉)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Epistemic modality and perfect morphology in Spanish and French. In Z. Guentcheva (Ed.). Epistemic modality and Evidentiality in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective (pp. 103–130). Berlin: Mouton/de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonetti, M. (2004). Por qué el imperfecto es anafórico. In L. García Fernández y B. Camus Bergareche (Eds.) El pretérito imperfecto (pp. 481–504). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledesma, M. M. (2014). Valores aspectuales del passé composé en L’Étranger de Albert Camus y sus implicancias en dos traducciones al español. M.A. Thesis. University of Córdoba. Available on line at [URL]
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, F. (2011). Epistemic modals in the past. In J. Berns, H. Jacobs, & T. Scheer (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ (pp. 185–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Available online at )Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olbertz, H. (1998): Verbal Periphrasis in a Functional Grammar of Spanish. Berlín/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RAE-ASALE. (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Real Academia Española, Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rocci, A. (2005). Epistemic Readings of Modal Verbs in Italian: the relationship between propositionality, theme-rheme, articulation an inferential discourse relations. In B. Hollebrandse, A. Van Hout & C. Vet (Eds.) Crosslinguistic Views on Tense, Aspect and Modality, (pp. 229–246). Amsterdam/New/York: Rodopi (Cahiers Chronos 13)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rullmann, H. & L. Matthewson (2018): Towards A Theory of Modal-Temporal Interaction. Language 94, 281–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2003). Modes of Discourse: The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steedman, M. (2005). The productions of time. Ms. (Available online at [URL].)
Stone, M. (1994). The Reference Argument of Epistemic Must. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computational Semantics (pp. 181–190). Tilburg University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stowell, T. (2004). Tense and Modals. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (Eds.), The Syntax of Time (pp. 621–636). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). The syntactic expression of tense. Lingua 117, 437–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Swart, H. (2007). A cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the Perfect. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (12), 2273–2307). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tasmowski, L. (1980). Un devoir opérateur. Travaux de linquistique 7, 43–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
WALS (= The World Atlas of Language Structures) = Van der Auwera, J. & Ammann, A. (2013). Epistemic Possibility. Situation Possibility. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ch. 74 & 75. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL])
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue