Cover not available

In:The Expression of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality in Albert Camus’s L'Étranger and Its Translations / L'Étranger de Camus et ses traductions : questions de temps, d'aspect, de modalité et d'évidentialité (TAME): An empirical study / Etude empirique
Edited by Eric Corre, Danh Thành Do-Hurinville and Huy Linh Dao
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 35] 2020
► pp. 117–142

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 7
Temporal prominence demotion in updating imparfait uses in L’Étranger

 | Universität zu Köln
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lis.35.07ege
Abstract
We investigate certain time updating uses of the French Imparfait in Camus’ L’Étranger which express ongoing eventualities but also update narrative time. Our focus lies on progressives with narrative features without an explicit marking of the update. We apply the prominence-based temporal account of Becker & Egetenmeyer (2018) and concentrate on the level of relations between time points. Using this approach, we determine the prominence value of the reference points the imparfaits introduce. In the described uses, the prominence value is demoted to minimally prominent within its domain. This has important consequences for the temporal structure of the passage they occur in as the prominence demoted reference point is not available as an anchor for following temporal updates. A comparison with two Spanish translations of L’Étranger supports our analysis.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Time updating uses of the imparfait
  • 3.A prominence-based account on the interrelations between times
  • 4.Studies carried out concerning time updating imparfait uses in L’Étranger
  • 5.The progressive with narrative features without explicit marking in L’Étranger
  • 6.The progressive with narrative features with explicit marking
  • 7.Further evidence: Comparison with the Spanish translation
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpus
References (53)
References
Altshuler, D. (2010). Temporal interpretation in narrative discourse and event internal reference. PhD dissertation, New Brunswick: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, N. et al. (1995). De l’espace-temps dans l’analyse du discours. Semiotique 9, 11–62 (online edition: [URL], p. 1–47).
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge et al. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balibar, E. (1972). Le passé composé fictif dans L’Étranger d’Albert Camus. Littérature, 7, 102–119.
Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge & Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bary, C. L. (2009). Aspect in Ancient Greek. A Semantic Analysis of the Aorist and Imperfective. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (= PhD dissertation).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beauchemin, Yves. (1981). Le Matou. Montreal: Québec Amérique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, M., & Egetenmeyer, J. (2018). A prominence-based account of temporal discourse structure. Lingua, 214, 28–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, É. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard (= Bibliothèque des sciences humaines).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berthonneau, A.-M., & Kleiber, G. (1999). Pour une réanalyse de l’imparfait de rupture dans le cadre de l’hypothèse anaphorique méronomique. Cahiers de praxématique [En ligne], 32, 119–166; [URL]
Bertinetto, P. M. (1986). Tempo, aspetto e azione nel werbe italiano. Il sistema dell’indicativo. Firenze: L’Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bres, J. (2005). L’imparfait dit narratif. Paris: CNRS Éditions (= Collection sciences du langage).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bu, J. (2016). A semantic study of tense backshift and its literary effects in FID. Journal of Literary Semantics 45 (1), 49–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabillau, J.-F. (1971). L’expression du temps dans “L’Étranger” d’Albert Camus. Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire, 49(3), 866–874. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caudal, P., & Vetters, C. (2005). Que l’imparfait n’est pas (encore) un prétérit. In P. Larrivée, & E. Labeau (Eds.), Nouveaux Développements de l’imparfait (pp. 45–77). Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi (= Cahiers Chronos 14).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. (1982). Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages & Linguistics (pp. 177–195). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doron, E. (1991). Point of view as a factor of content. In S. K. Moore, & A. Z. Wyner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (pp. 51–64). Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egetenmeyer, J. (Submitted a). Temporal relations of free indirect discourse events.
(Submitted b). Time updating uses of the French imparfait extending across genres.
Eggermont, C. (2010). L’étrange Passé Composé dans “L’Étranger” d’Albert Camus. Romaneske, 35(4), 16–22. [Preprint version]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1980). Narrative Discourse. An Essay in Method. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grobe, E. P. (1967a). An exemplary case of the French “imparfait de durée”. Romance Notes, 9(1), 152–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1967b). Passé simple versus imparfait. The French Review, 41(3), 344–356.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guéron, J. (2015). Subjectivity and Free Indirect Discourse. In J. Guéron (Ed.), Sentence and Discourse (pp. 256–286). Oxford: Oxford University Press (= Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N., & Primus, B. (2015). Prominence beyond prosody – a first approximation. In A. De Dominicis (Ed.), pS-prominenceS: Prominences in Linguistics (pp. 38–58). Proceedings of the International Conference, Viterbo: DISUCOM Press.
Hinterwimmer, S. (2017). Two kinds of perspective taking in narrative texts. In D. Burgdorf et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 27), 282–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jasinskaja, K., & Karagjosova, E. (Forthcoming). Rhetorical Relations. In L. Matthewson et al. (Eds.), The Companion to Semantics. Oxford: Wiley.
Jones, M. A. (1996). Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (= Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, H. (2013). Deixis in discourse. Reichenbach on temporal reference. In K. von Heusinger & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Meaning and the Dynamics of Interpretation (pp. 105–159). Leiden: Brill (= Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 29). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Pt. 2. Dordrecht et al.: Kluwer Academic Publishers (= Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 42).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, H., & Rohrer, C. (1983). Tense in texts. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language (pp. 250–269). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, H., van Genabith, J., & Reyle, U. (2011). Discourse Representation Theory. In D. M. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd ed., vol. 15, (pp. 125–394). Dordrecht et al.: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1994). Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labeau, E. (2004). Le(s) temps du compte rendu sportif. Journal of French Language Studies 14, 129–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). French television talk: What tenses for past time? International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(1), 1–28. . [Page reference in the text corresponds to online version.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labelle, M. (2003). Events, states and the French imparfait. In Y. Roberge, & A. T. Pérez Leroux (Eds.), Romance Linguistics: Theory and Acquisition: Selected Papers from the 32nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Toronto, April 2002, (pp. 165–180). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landeweerd, R. (1998). Discourse semantics of perspective and temporal structure. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (= PhD dissertation).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lhafi, S. C. (2012). Zum Plusquamperfekt im Französischen und Spanischen. Kontrastive Untersuchung aus textlinguistischer Perspektive. Frankfurt am Main et al.: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molendijk, A. (1990). Le passé simple et l’imparfait: une approche reichenbachienne. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). The Imparfait of French and the Past Progressive of English. In B. Hollebrandse, A. van Hout, & C. Vet (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on tense, aspect and modality (pp. 119–129). Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi (= Cahiers Chronos 13).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molendijk, A., et al. (2004). Meaning and use of past tenses in discourse. In F. Corblin, & H. de Swart (Eds.), Handbook of French Semantics (pp. 271–308). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patard, A. (2010). L’imparfait en voie de « prétérisation » ? Quelques éléments de réflexion. Travaux du Cercle Belge de Linguistique 5, 1–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polanyi, L. (1988). A formal model of the structure of discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(5–6), 301–638. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. ([1947] 1956). Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York et al.: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. ([1943] 1947). Explication de L’Étranger. In J.-P. Sartre (Ed.), Situations I (pp. 99–121). Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2003). Modes of Discourse. The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Swart, H. (2001). Discourse properties of the Perfect and related tenses in French, English, and Dutch. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 44, 195–212.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). A cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the Perfect. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2273–2307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tasmowski-De Ryck, L. (1985). L’imparfait sans et avec rupture. Langue française, 67(3), 59–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpus
Base textuelle FRANTEXT, ATILF – CNRS & Université de Lorraine. <[URL]>. Version: December 2016.
Camus, A. (1942). L’Étranger. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valente. (2005) = Camus, A. (2005). El extranjero. Traducción de José Ángel Valente. Madrid: Alianza Editorial / Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Del Carril. (2013) = Camus, A. (2013). El extranjero. Traducción de Bonifacio Del Carril. Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Astrid De Wit, Frank Brisard, Carol Madden-Lombardi, Michael Meeuwis & Adeline Patard
2024. Beyond Aspectual Semantics, DOI logo
Egetenmeyer, Jakob
2020. The Prominence Value of the Temporal Anchor of Free Indirect Discourse: A Comparison with the Perspectival Center. Discours :27 DOI logo
Egetenmeyer, Jakob
2023. The Temporal Relationships between the Pluscuamperfecto andmientras+ Imperfecto. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Egetenmeyer, Jakob
2024. The The time updating imperfecto in Spanish. Moenia DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue