Cover not available

In:Atypical predicate-argument relations
Edited by Thierry Ruchot and Pascale Van Praet
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 33] 2016
► pp. 181–201

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Atypical argument structures in French

From metaphorical uses to atypical ones

 | Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3 | EA 4398 PRISMES
Published online: 8 December 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lis.33.08gir
The article analyses some atypical constructions of French intransitive verbs, such as ils ont suicidé le ministre (they suicided the minister), la crème a explosé les poux (the cream exploded the lice), and tries to account for their existence, as the construction is not always possible, and differs semantically from ils l’ont fait se suicider (they made him commit suicide), il a fait exploser la bombe (he triggered the bomb), where the FAIRE faire construction is compulsory. The hypothesis is that the atypical constructions can be explained within the domain of causative constructions, and more particularly with regard to the distinction between internal and external causation (Guéron, Talmy, Levin, McKoon and Macfarland). The atypical constructions are only possible when no internal causation is available, namely when the causee does not possess the internal characteristics enabling the change of state to occur: the minister was not the suicidal type and the interpretation is then that he was murdered. A change of state did occur, but not the one denoted by the lexical verb. The motivation for the structure is the wish to highlight an unexpected event.
References (44)
References
Abeillé, A., D. Godard & P. Miller. 1997. Les causatives en français, un cas de compétition syntaxique. In F. Gadet (éd.), Langue français, La Variation syntaxique, 62–74. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albrespit, J. 2003. Sujet et agentivité en anglais. In J.-M. Merle (éd.), Le Sujet, 125–136. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. & E. Anagnostopoulou. 2003. Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative alternation: Evidence for a non-unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In A. Alexiadou, 
E. Anagnostopoulou, & M. Everaert (eds.), The unaccusative puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, 114–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., E. Anagnostopoulou, & F. Schäfer. 2006. The properties of anti-causatives crosslinguistically. In M. Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 187–211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ben Salah Tlili, I. 2007. Contribution à l’étude des verbes symétriques en français. contemporain. In J. François & A. Brahim (dir.), Morphosyntaxe et sémantique du verbe, Cahiers du CRISCO 23. 16–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boons J.P., A. Guillet & C. Leclère.1976. La structure des phrases simples du français: constructions intransitives. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatti, S. 2009. Sémantique de la causation analytique. PhD Dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, J., N. Hall & L.A. Paul (eds.). 2004. Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotte, P. 1993. Ces mouvements qui font signe. In Motivation et Iconicité Faits de langues, 129–136. Paris: PUF. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. 1994. The semantics of subjecthood. In M. Yaguello (éd.), Subjecthood and subjectivity, the status of the subject in linguistic theory, 29–75. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. 1984. Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in Language 8. 181–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delechelle, G. 1989. L’expression de la cause en anglais contemporain. PhD Dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3.
Delmas, C. 2001. La sémantique propose, la syntaxe dispose. QWERTY, 11, Pau, P.U.Pau, 247–255.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Fragments d’un discours culinaire. In L. Gournay & J.-M. Merle (dir.), Contrast, Mélanges offerts à J. Guillemin-Flescher, 25–34. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Variation autour de “feel”. In F. Fredet & A.-M. Laurian (dir.), Linguistique contrastive, linguistique appliquée, sociolinguistique, 75–81. Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubois, J. & F. Dubois-Charlier . 1997. Les Verbes français. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubois J. & F. Dubois-Charlier. 2011. Les Verbes français. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forest R. 1988. Sémantisme entéléchique et affinité descriptive: pour une ré-analyse des verbes symétriques ou neutres en français. Bulletin de la société linguistique de Paris 83(1). 137–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
François, J., G. Rauh & J. Broschart. 1994. Les relations actancielles, sémantique, syntaxe, morphologie. Langages 28. 113–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Girard-Gillet, G. 1999. Make/Lassen/Faire, Semantic delimitation and syntactic construction. In Contrast, Comparison and Communication (CIEREC, Travaux XCVI), 49–60. St Etienne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Structuration lexicale et structuration syntaxique dans l’expression de la causation. In C. Delmas (éd.), Complétude, Cognition, construction linguistique, 47–61. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Girardin, C. 2003. Polysémie des verbes et traitement argumental dans les dictionnaires du XVIIe siècle: le verbe cuire . Polysémie et Polylexicalité, Syntaxe et Sémantique 5. 131–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guéron, J. 2008. Visible effects, hidden causes. In G. Girard-Gillet (éd.), L’envers du décor, études de linguistique anglaise, 158–179. Université d’Avignon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1993. More on typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In B. Comry & M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, J. 1999. The syntax and Semantics of causative verbs. UCPWPL 11. 323–348.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koenig, J.-P., G. Mauner, B. Bienvenue, & K. Conklin. 2007. What with?: The anatomy of a (proto)-role. Ms. University of Buffalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford U.P.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazard, G. 1994. L’Actance. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Des patients qui ne veulent pas disparaître, Un complément à l’analyse de Goldberg des constructions causatives sans objet. In Six études de linguistique, Occasional Papers, 1, 117–138. Rouen: CERCLES.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. & M. Rappaport-Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantic interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. 2009. Further explorations of the landscape of causation: Comments on Alexiadou and Anagnostopoulou. MIT Working Papers, 239–266. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKoon, G. & T. Macfarland. 2000. External and internally caused changed of state verbs. Language 76. 833–856. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Event templates in the lexical representations of verbs. Cognitive Psychology 45. 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pasero, R., P. Sabatier & M.-H. Stefanini. 2010. Syntaxe et sémantique formelle des constructions verbales exprimant des relations symétriques. In D. Leeman & P. Sabatier (dir.), Empirie, Théorie, Exploitation: le travail de Jean Dubois sur les verbes français, Langages, 179–180, Paris: Larousse, pp. 115–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 2008. The stuff of thought. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samardzic, T. & P. Merlo. 2012. The meaning of lexical causatives in cross-linguistic variation. LILT 7(12). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, F. 2009. The causative alternation. In Language and linguistics compass, vol. 3, 641–681. Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. (éd.). 1958. Eléments de syntaxe structural. Paris: Klincksieck. 5th edition, 1988.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin R.D. & R.J. LaPolla. 1997. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, A. 1987. La réflexivité ergative en français moderne. Le Français moderne 55. 23–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Girard-Gillet, Geneviève
2020. La causation en français : la construction transitive et la construction en FAIRE1. Linx :80 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue