Cover not available

In:À la recherche de la prédication: Autour des syntagmes prépositionnels
Sous la direction de Christiane Marque-Pucheu, Fryni Kakoyianni-Doa, Peter A. Machonis et Harald Ulland
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 32] 2016
► pp. 141–158

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Sur le syntagme prépositionnel en N en grec ancien. Syntaxe et lexique de ses combinaisons avec le verbe ékhein ‘avoir’

Article language: French

Published online: 24 November 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lis.32.08tro
This paper focuses on three Ancient Greek constructions, which have the same surface structure N0 ékhein N1 en N2, but different lexical, semantic and syntactic features. The aim of the study is to give an account of these differences by investigating: (a) the value of both the prepositional phrase and the noun phrases occurring in the clauses; (b) the relationship between syntactic functions and lexical-semantic features. The investigation is corpus-based and follows the Lexicon-Grammar approach. On the one hand, results are expected to contribute to the debate on the interaction between lexical categories and syntactic functions; on the other hand, they wish to provide analyses of Ancient Greek constructions, in order to stimulate reflections on the diachrony of the Greek language.
References (20)
Références
Benedetti, M. (2010). Omogeneità formale e varietà funzionale in costrutti con ἔχειν in greco antico. In R. Ajello et al. (Eds.), Quae omnia bella devoratis. Studi in memoria di Edoardo Vineis (pp.75–87). Pisa : ETS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Linguistik und alte Sprachen: ‘Experimente’ zu altgr. ἔχειν. In T. Krisch, & T. Lindner (Eds.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog. Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. Bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg (pp. 59–68). Wiesbaden : Reichert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benedetti, M., & Bruno, C. (2012). A proposito di alcuni costrutti con ἔχειν nel greco antico. In L. Lorenzetti, & M. Mancini (Eds.), Discontinuità e creolizzazione nell’Europa linguistica (pp. 7–27). Roma : Il Calamo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bortone, P. (2010). Greek Prepositions From Antiquity to the Present. Oxford : Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, M. (1975). Méthodes en syntaxe. Paris : Hermann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1981). Les bases empiriques de la notion de prédicat sémantique. In A. Guillet, & Ch. Leclère (Eds.), Langages 63. Formes syntaxiques et prédicats sémantiques (pp. 7–52). Paris : Larousse.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillet, A., & Leclère, Ch. (1981). Restructuration du groupe nominal. In A. Guillet, & Ch. Leclère (Eds.), Langages 63. Formes syntaxiques et prédicats sémantiques (pp. 99–126). Paris : Larousse.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. (1981). Space and Time in Homer. Prepositional and Adverbial Particles in the Greek Epic. New York : Arno Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kühner, R., & Gerth, B. (1898). Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. Zweiter Teil: Satzlehre. Erster Band. Hannover-Leipzig : Hahn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeman, D. (1997). Sur la préposition en . Faits de langues, 9, 135–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirto, I.M. (1998). The Syntax of the Meronymic Construction. Pisa : ETS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirto, I.M., & Rosen, C.G. (1993). Meronyms as predicates : an apparent ‘inalienable possession’ construction. Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakamura, T. (2014). Construction N avoir pour N X . In Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF 2014. SHS Web of Conferences 8 (2014).
. (2016). Pour ø N : absence de déterminant dans la construction N avoir pour N X. In A. Gautier, E. Havu, & D. Van Raemdonck (Eds.), Déterminations (pp. 217–233). Bruxelles : Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pompeo, F. (2002). Dall’avverbio localistico alla preposizione in Omero. Roma : Il Calamo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Considerazioni di metodo sull’analisi dei sintagmi preposizionali nel greco omerico. In F. Pompeo, & M.C. Benvenuto (Eds.), Dal significante al contesto. Saggi sull’interpretazione di forme e strutture (pp. 7–24). Cosenza : Pellegrini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwyzer, E. (1950). Griechische Grammatik. Zweiter Band : Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. München : C.H. Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tronci, L. (2009). Sur les expressions de sentiment en grec ancien. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 32(2), 226–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandeloise, C. (1994). Methodology and analysis of the preposition in . Cognitive Linguistics 5(2), 157–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Fendel, Victoria Beatrix
2024. Support-Verb Constructions in the Magical Papyri of the Later Roman and Early Byzantine Periods: A Special Case of Technical Writing. Symbolae Osloenses 98:1 ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix
2024. Celebrating diversity: The origins and pathways of three support-verb constructions. Lexis 24 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue