Get fulltext from our e-platform

Continuity in Linguistic Semantics
Until recently, most linguistic theories as well as theories of cognition have avoided use of the notion of continuity. At the moment, however, several linguistic trends, sharing a preoccupation with semantico-cognitive problems (e.g. cognitive grammars, 'psychomechanics', 'enunciative theories'), are trying to go beyond the constraints imposed by discrete approaches. At the same time, mathematical (e.g. differential geometry and dynamical systems) and computer science tools (e.g. connectionism) have been proposed that can be used for modelling of continuous linguistic phenomena.
In this volume, linguists, philosophers, mathematicians and computer scientists discuss which semantic phenomena (linked to the lexicon, to grammatical theories or to syntactic structures) call for continuous models and which formalisation tools can contribute to the development of such models. The first part of the book is devoted to linguistic issues, the second part deals with modelling issues.
Many important questions are raised in the discussion, for instance: Is continuity just a convenient representation of gradual yet discrete facts, or is it an intrinsic characteristic of semantic phenomena? How can the introduction of continuity be reconciled with a methodology based on the falsifiability of theories? What is the link between continuity and Gestalt theory? Can linguistic continuity be accounted for by mathematical models? What about statistical models? How can continuity be implemented on a digital and therefore discrete machine?
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa, 19] 1994. iv, 255 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 7 November 2011
Published online on 7 November 2011
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
- Preface | pp. 3–8
- I. Linguistic Issues
- The limits of continuity: discreteness in cognitive semanticsRonald W. Langacker | p. 9
- Continuity and modalityAntoine Culioli | p. 21
- Continuum in cognition and continuum in languageHansjakob Seiler | p. 33
- Is there continuity in syntax?Pierre Le Goffic | p. 45
- The use of computer corpora in the textual demonstrability of gradience in linguistic categoriesGeoffrey N. Leech, Brian Francis and Xfueng Xu | p. 57
- A “continuous definition” of polysemous items: its basis, ressources and limitsJacqueline Picoche | p. 77
- The challenges of continuity for a linguistic approach to semanticsCatherine Fuchs | p. 93
- II. Modelling Issues
- What kind of models do we need for the simulation of understanding?Daniel Kayser | p. 111
- Continuity, cognition and linguisticsJean-Michel Salanskis | p. 127
- Reflections on Hansjakob Seiler’s continuumRene Thom | p. 155
- Attractor syntax: morphodynamics and cognitive grammarJean Petitot | p. 167
- A discrete approach based on logic simulating continuity in lexical semanticsViolaine Prince | p. 189
- Coarse coding and the lexiconCatherine L. Harris | p. 205
- Continuity, polysemy and representation: understanding the verb ‘cut’David Touretzky | p. 231
- The use of continuity in modelling semantic phenomenaBernard Victorri | p. 241
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Víctor Fresno Fernández
Gardelle, Laure & Frédéric Landragin
2024. Flou, vague et sous-détermination dans la référence.
Lingvisticae Investigationes
47:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Missire, Régis
Col, Gilles, Rossana De Angelis & Thierry Poibeau
Gauchola Gamarra, Roser
François, Jacques
Mellet, Sylvie
Tissari, Heli
Visetti, Yves-Marie
Bosch, Sonja E. & D. J. Prinsloo
Fuchs, Catherine
Hendrikse, A. P.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.