Mats Johansson. Clefts in English and Swedish. A Contrastive Study of IT-Clefts and WH-Clefts in Original Texts and Translations. University of Lund, 2002. PhD Dissertation.219 pp.

Reviewed by

Jeanette K. Gundel | University of Minnesota, Minneapolis and NTNU, Trondheim

Published online: 6 June 2003

https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.3.1.09gun

References (5)

References

Gundel, J. K. 1999. “On Three Kinds of Focus.” In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds), Focus. Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, 293–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2002. “Information Structure and the Use of Cleft Sentences in English and Norwegian.” In Information Structure in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, H. Hasselgård, S. Johansson, B. Behrens, and C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 113–128. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Hedberg, N. 2000. “The Referential Status of Clefts.” Language 761: 891–920.

Johansson, S. 2001. “The German and Norwegian Correspondences to the English Construction Type that’s what .” Linguistics 391: 583–605.

Prince, E. F. 1978. “A Comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in Discourse.” Language 541: 883–906.

Mats Johansson. Clefts in English and Swedish. A Contrastive Study of IT-Clefts and WH-Clefts in Original Texts and Translations. University of Lund, 2002. PhD Dissertation.219 pp.

Mats Johansson. Clefts in English and Swedish. A Contrastive Study of IT-Clefts and WH-Clefts in Original Texts and Translations. University of Lund, 2002. PhD Dissertation.219 pp.