Article published In: Languages in Contrast
Vol. 22:1 (2022) ► pp.136–159
Grammatical and cognitive factors shaping the conceptualization of motion events
A cross-linguistic investigation of language production and memory performance
Published online: 7 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.21005.zay
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.21005.zay
Abstract
Motion event construal gives insight into the nature of the linguistic and conceptual representations underlying
the encoding of events. Studies show that event descriptions differ cross-linguistically due to, amongst other factors, the
absence or presence of grammatical aspect. While speakers of aspect languages generally focus on the process, speakers of
non-aspect languages tend to perceive the event holistically and focus on endpoints. This investigation examines visual
endpoint salience as a further factor that shapes event encoding. Thus, in this model, grammatical aspect is seen as
a part of a more complex system of factors that determine event construal. The analyses, which cover German speakers, English
speakers, and German-speaking learners of English, involve linguistic production data and results from memory performance tests.
The findings show that the focus on endpoints increases for salient stimuli. While German speakers and learners of English show a
tendency to focus on endpoints, a clear preference for focusing on the process can be observed in English speakers. Verbalizing
endpoints correlates with the ability to remember them in a memorization task. The implications of these outcomes are discussed in
the context of two factors which shape event encoding: grammatical aspect and endpoint salience.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.State of the art
- 3.Current study
- 3.1Research questions
- 3.2Participants
- 3.3Material
- 3.4Procedure
- 3.5Data coding and analysis
- 3.6Results
- 3.6.1Language production data
- 3.6.2Memorization task data analysis
- 3.7Discussion
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (43)
Athanasopoulos, P. and Bylund, E. 2012. Does
Grammatical Aspect Affect Motion Event Cognition? A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of English and Swedish
Speakers. Cognitive
Science 37(2): 286–309.
Bepperling, S. and Härtl, H. 2013. Ereigniskonzeptualisierung
im Zweitspracherwerb ― Thinking for Speaking im Vergleich von Muttersprachlern und
Lernern. Zeitschrift für
Semiotik 35(1–2): 159–191.
Bernabeu, P. and Tillman, R. 2019. More
Refined Typology and Design in Linguistic Relativity: The Case of Motion Event Encoding. Dutch
Journal of Applied
Linguistics 8(2): 163–171.
Bylund, E., Athanasopoulos, P. and Oostendorp, M. 2013. Motion
Event Cognition and Grammatical Aspect: Evidence from
Afrikaans. Linguistics 51(5): 929–955.
Cardini, F. 2010. Evidence
against Whorfian Effects in Motion Conceptualisation. Journal of
Pragmatics 421: 1442–1459.
Chen, T., Xu, M., Tu, J., Wang, H. and Niu, X. 2018. Relationship
between Omnibus and Post-hoc Tests: An Investigation of Performance of the F Test in
ANOVA. Shanghai Arch
Psychiatry 30(1): 60–64.
Do, M. L., Papafragou, A. and Trueswell, J. 2020. Cognitive
and Pragmatic Factors in Language Production: Evidence from Source-Goal Motion
Events. Cognition 2051: 1–62.
Engemann, H., Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., Soroli, E. and Vincent, C. 2015. How
Language Impacts Memory of Motion Events in English and French. Cognitive
Processing 16(1): 209–213.
Feinmann, D. 2019. Language
and Thought in the Motion Domain: Methodological Considerations and New Empirical
Evidence. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research 49(1): 1–29.
Filipović, L. 2009. Motion
Events in Eyewitness Interviews, Translation and Memory: Typological and Psycholinguistic
Perspectives. Language and Linguistics
Compass 3(1): 300–313.
2011. Speaking
and Remembering in one or two Languages: Bilingual vs. Monolingual Lexicalization and Memory for Motion
Events. International Journal of
Bilingualism 15(4): 466–485.
Filipović, L. and Geva, S. 2012. Language-Specific
Effects on Lexicalization and Memory of Motion Events. In Space and
Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, Culture, and Cognition, L. Filipović and K. M. Jaszczolt (eds), 269–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Flecken, M. (ed.). 2010. Event
Conceptualization in Language Production of Early
Bilinguals. Nijmegen: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Flecken, M., Carroll, M., Weimar, K. and von Stutterheim, C. 2015. Driving
along the Road or Heading for the Village? Conceptual Differences Underlying Motion Event Encoding in French, German, and
French–German L2 Users. The Modern Language
Journal 99(S1): 100–122.
Flecken, M., von Stutterheim, C. and Carroll, M. 2014. Grammatical
Aspect Influences Motion Event Perception: Evidence from a Cross-Linguistic Non-Verbal Recognition
Task. Language and
Cognition 6(1): 45–78.
Georgakopoulos, T. and Härtl, H. 2020. Goal
Prevalence and Situation Types: An Empirical Analysis of Differences in Greek and German Motion Event
Descriptions. In Theoretical Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics.
Morphological and Syntactic Perspectives, M. Georgiafentis, G. Giannoulopoulou, M. Koliopoulou and A. Tsokoglou (eds), 262–280. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Georgakopoulos, T., Härtl, H. and Sioupi, A. 2019. Goal
Realization: An Empirically Based Comparison between English, German and Greek. Languages in
Contrast 19(2): 280–309.
Griffin, Z. and Bock, K. 2000. What
the Eyes Say about Speaking. Psychological
Science 111: 274–279.
Johanson, M. and Papafragou, A. 2010. Universality
and Language Specificity in the Acquisition of Path Vocabulary. Paper presented at the 34th
Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 34). Boston University, USA, 6–8 November 2009.
Lakusta, L. and DiFabrizio, S. 2017. And,
the Winner is… A Visual Preference for Endpoints over Starting Points in Infants’ Motion Event
Representations. Infancy 22(3): 323–343.
Lakusta, L. and Landau, B. 2012. Language
and Memory for Motion Events: Origins of the Asymmetry between Source and Goal Paths. Cognitive
Science 36(3): 517–544.
Lakusta, L., Wagner, L., O’Hearn, K. and Landau, B. 2007. Conceptual
Foundations of Spatial Language: Evidence for a Goal Bias in Infants. Language Learning and
Development 3(3): 179–197.
Langacker, R. (ed.). 2008. Cognitive
Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Liao, Y., Flecken, M., Dijkstra, K. and Zwaan, R. A. 2019. Going
Places in Dutch and Mandarin Chinese: Conceptualising the Path of Motion
Cross-Linguistically. Language, Cognition and
Neuroscience 35(4): 498–520.
Mertins, B. (ed.). 2018. Sprache
und Kognition: Ereigniskonzeptualisierung im Deutschen und
Tschechischen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Meyer, A. S. and Van der Meulen, F. F. 2000. Phonological
Priming Effects on Speech Onset Latencies and Viewing Times in Object Naming. Psychonomic
Bulletin &
Review 7(2): 314–319.
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. and Gleitman, L. 2002. Shake,
Rattle, ‘n’ Roll: The Representation of Motion in Language and
Cognition. Cognition 84(2): 189–219.
Purschke, C. 2014. “I
Remember it like it was Interesting”: Zur Theorie von Salienz und Pertinenz. Linguistik
Online 66(4/14): 31–50.
Rácz, P. 2012. Operationalising
Salience: Definite Article Reduction in the North of England. English Language and
Linguistics 16(1): 57–79.
Regier, T. and Zheng, M. 2007. Attention
to Endpoints: A Cross-Linguistic Constraint on Spatial Meaning. Cognitive
Science 31(4): 705–719.
Schmiedtová, B., von Stutterheim, C. and Carroll, M. 2011. Language-Specific
Patterns in Event Construal of Advanced Second Language
Speakers. In Thinking and Speaking in Two
Languages, A. Pavlenko (ed.), 66–107. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Skordos, D., Bunger, A., Richards, C., Selimis, S., Trueswell, J. and Papafragou, A. 2019. Motion
Verbs and Memory for Motion Events. Cognitive
Neuropsychology 37(5–6): 254–270.
Slobin, D. I. 2003. Language
and Thought Online: Cognitive Consequences of Linguistic
Relativity. In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language
and Thought, D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds), 157–192. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stefanowitsch, A. and Rohde, A. 2004. The
Goal Bias in the Encoding of Motion Events. In Studies in Linguistic
Motivation, G. Radden and K.-U. Panther (eds), 249–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Talmy, L. (ed.). 2000. Toward
a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept
Structuring. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Von Stutterheim, C. 2003. Linguistic
Structure and Information Organisation: The Case of very Advanced Learners. EuroSLA
Yearbook 3(1): 183–206.
Von Stutterheim, C., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M. and Schmiedtová, B. 2012. How
Grammaticized Concepts Shape Event Conceptualization in Language Production: Insights from Linguistic Analysis, Eye Tracking
Data, and Memory
Performance. Linguistics 50(4): 833–867.
Von Stutterheim, C., Carroll, M. and Klein, W. 2009. New
Perspectives in Analyzing Aspectual Distinctions across
Languages. In The Expression of Time, W. Klein and P. Li (eds), 195–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
