Cover not available

Article published In: Languages in Contrast
Vol. 17:1 (2017) ► pp.43–68

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Compounding in German and English

A quantitative translation study

 | University of Hamburg
Published online: 13 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.17.1.03ber
Abstract
German is well-known for its propensity for nominal compounding. This claim is put on a firmer empirical footing by means of a bidirectional translation study between German and English. The difference between the two languages crystallizes in the competition between compounds and phrases. Two complementary asymmetries emerge: first, German compounds are more frequently translated by English phrases than English compounds by German phrases; second, English phrases are more frequently translated by German compounds than German phrases by English compounds. An extension to other word classes shows that the compounding bias in German is not restricted to nouns. It is tentatively argued that the token frequency of word classes plays a role in the emergence of compound propensity. The heavier use of nouns and adjectives in German than in English might be partly responsible for the higher rate of nominal and adjectival compounding in the former than the latter language.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
  • 3.Translating nominal compounds (and phrases)
  • 4.Assessing the rate of non-nominal compounding
  • 5.A frequency analysis of German and English word classes
  • 6.Outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Primary Works
References (64)
References
Andrews, Sally, Brett Miller and Keith Rayner 2004. Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 161: 285–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock and Leon Gulikers 1995. The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie 1978. The grammar of nominal compounding. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? English Language and Linguistics 21: 65–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, Thomas 1992. Compounding in German. Rivista di Linguistica 41: 5–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg, Thomas 1992. Prelexical and postlexical features in language production. Applied Psycholinguistics 131: 199–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. The position of adjectives on the noun-verb continuum. English Language and Linguistics 41: 269–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. The multiplanar nature of frequency. Glottotheory 71: 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg, Thomas, Sabine Helmer, Marion Neubauer and Arne Lohmann 2012. Determinants of the extent of compound use: A contrastive study. Linguistics 501: 269–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Victoria Clark 2002. Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures. In English historical syntax and morphology, Teresa Fanego, María José López-Cousa and Javier Pérez-Guerra (eds), 43–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bien, Heidrun, Willem J. M. Levelt and R. Harald Baayen 2005. Frequency effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1021: 17876–17881. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deng, Yaochen 2009. A synergetic linguistic study on compounding propensity in technical English. Glottotheory 21: 54–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Djirackor, Yao 1982. Untersuchungen zur Wiedergabe deutscher Substantivkomposita im Englischen. Eine kontrastive Studie. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doherty, Monika 1993. Parametrisierte Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 121: 3–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donalies, Elke 2004. Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich: Kombinatorische Begriffsbildung. Teil 1: Substantivkomposition. Mannheim: Institut für deutsche Sprache.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Komposita, Derivate und Phraseme des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich. Deutsche Sprache 361: 305–323.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gary Libben, Jacqueline Stark, Christiane Pons and Gonia Jarema 2001. The processing of interfixed German compounds. In Yearbook of Morphology 1999, Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds), 185–220. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erben, Johannes 2003. Hauptaspekte der Entwicklung der Wortbildung in der Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. In Sprachgeschichte, Vol. 31, Werner Besch, Anne Betten, Oskar Reichmann and Stefan Sonderegger (eds), 2525–2539. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ermlich, Karsten 2004. Zur Wiedergabe deutscher Substantivkomposita im Englischen. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 411: 206–212.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fabb, Nigel 1998. Compounding. In The handbook of morphology, Andrew Spencer and Arnold Zwicky (eds), 66–83. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fan, Fengxiang and Gabriel Altmann 2007. Some properties of English compounds. In Problems of typological and quantitative lexicology, Volodymir Kaliuscenko, Reinhard Köhler and Viktor Levickij (eds), 177–189. Chernivtsi: Puta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fay, David and Anne Cutler 1977. Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 505–520.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Klaus 1999. Englische und deutsche Satzstrukturen: ein valenztheoretischer Vergleich mit statistischen Anmerkungen. Sprachwissenschaft 241: 221–255.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Komplexität und semantische Transparenz im Deutschen und Englischen. Sprachwissenschaft 321: 355–405.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio and Davide Ricca 2009. “Composita solvantur”: Compounds as lexical units or morphological objects? Rivista di Linguistica 211: 35–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1960. A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language. International Journal of American Linguistics 261: 178–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunkel, Lutz and Gisela Zifonun 2008. Constraints on relational-adjective noun constructions: A comparative view on English, German and French. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 561: 283–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin 2015. From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 261: 113–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hüning, Matthias and Barbara Schlücker 2010. Konvergenz und Divergenz in der Wortbildung – Komposita im Niederländischen und Deutschen. In Kontrastive germanistische Linguistik. Band 2, Antje Dammel, Sebastian Kürschner and Damaris Nübling (eds), 783–825. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
James, Carl 1980. Contrastive analysis. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig and Knut Hofland 1989. Frequency analysis of English vocabulary and grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juhasz, Barbara J. , Matthew S. Starr, Albrecht W. Inhoff and Lars Placke 2003. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decision and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology 941: 223–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klinge, Alex 2005. The structure of English nominals. Unpublished postdoctoral thesis. Copenhagen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koester, Dirk, Thomas C. Gunter, Susanne Wagner and Angela D. Friederici 2004. Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 161: 1647–1668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd and Paul Georg Meyer 1992. Is English grammar more explicit than German grammar, after all? In New departures in contrastive linguistics. Vol. 11, Christian Mair and Manfred Markus (eds), 155–166. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krott, Andrea, Robert Schreuder and R. Harald Baayen 1999. Complex words in complex words. Linguistics 371: 905–926. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 1990. Contrasting languages. The scope of contrastive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuperman, Victor, Robert Schreuder, Raymond Bertram and R. Harald Baayen 2009. Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 351: 876–895.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle 1992. Compounding in English. Rivista di Linguistica 41: 79–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian, Marianne Hundt, Geoffrey Leech and Nicholas Smith 2002. Short-term diachronic shifts in part-of-speech frequencies. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 71: 245–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen and Virginia Yip 2004. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morton, John 1969. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 761: 165–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter 1979. Growth and structure of the lexicon of New Guinea Pidgin. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pastor-Gómez, Iria 2011. The status and development of N + N sequences in contemporary English noun phrases. Bern: Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Simeon 1957. Modern linguistics. London: Andre Deutsch.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roelofs, Ardi 1997. Morpheme frequency in speech production: Testing WEAVER. In: Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds), 135–154. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter 1998. Subordinate clauses introduced by interpretative verbs in English and their less explicit counterparts in German. In Kontrast und Äquivalenz, Wolfgang Börner and Klaus Vogel (eds), 233–249. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadeniemi, Markus, Kimmo Kettunen, Tiina Lindh-Knuutila and Timo Honkela 2008. Complexity of European Union languages: A comparative approach. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 151: 185–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanchez, Christina 2008. Consociation and dissociation. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlücker, Barbara 2012. Die deutsche Kompositionsfreudigkeit. Übersicht und Einführung. In Das Deutsche als kompositionsfreudige Sprache, Livio Gaeta and Barbara Schlücker (eds), 1–15. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steiner, Erich 2012. A characterization of the resource based on shallow statistics. In Cross-linguistic corpora for the study of translations, Silvia Hansen-Schirra, Stella Neumann and Erich Steiner (eds), 71–89. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stöhr, Ingo R. 1987. Pragmatic factors and nominal compounding: the influence of „deictic” reference in English and German. In Neuere Forschungen zur Wortbildung und Historiographie der Linguistik, Brigitte Asbach-Schnitker and Johannes Roggenhofer (eds), 31–39. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Twain, Mark 1880/1997. A tramp abroad. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wandruszka, Mario 1968. Englische und deutsche Nominalkomposition. In Wortbildung, Syntax und Morphologie, Herbert E. Brekle and Leonhard Lipka (eds), 242–250. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1969. Sprachen. Vergleichbar und unvergleichlich. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmer, Karl E. 1981. Some general observations about nominal compounds. In Wortbildung, Leonhard Lipka and Hartmut Günther (eds), 233–257. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1978/79. Classical malapropisms. Language Sciences 11, 339–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primary Works
German → English
Schirach, Ferdinand von: Der Fall Collini. Munich: Piper, 2011 (up to middle of p. 98). – English translation: The Collini Case. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2012. (up to and including p. 105)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
English → German
Rankin, Ian: Exit music. London: Orion, 2007 (up to and including p. 211). – German translation: Ein Rest von Schuld. Munich: Goldmann, 2008 (up to and including p. 253).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
English
Christie, Agatha: Hercule Poirot, Miss Marple and Three Whodunits. – Hercule Poirot, Miss Marple und Drei Fälle. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1984/1998.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron, Alexander et al.: English Short Stories – Englische Kurzgeschichten. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1984/1994.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Deilen, Silvana, Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski & Anna Lafrenz
2025. Translation of compound terms: Cognitive insights. Lebende Sprachen 70:1 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Li, Yuan, Yushan Li & Lin Sophie Teng
2025. Unraveling the Impact of Linguistic Complexity on L2 German Writing Performance Among Chinese Learners: A Cross‐Genre Comparison. International Journal of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Deilen, Silvana, Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski & Michael Carl
2023. Cognitive aspects of compound translation: Insights into the relation between implicitation and cognitive effort from a translation process perspective. Ampersand 11 ► pp. 100156 ff. DOI logo
Maekelberghe, Charlotte & Isabelle Delaere
2023. Functional hybridity in translation. Languages in Contrast 23:2 ► pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
Heilmann, Arndt, Jonas Freiwald, Stella Neumann & Zoë Miljanović
2022. Analyzing the effects of entrenched grammatical constructions on translation. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 5:1 ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Kosmata, Eva & Barbara Schlücker
2022. Contact-induced grammatical change?. Languages in Contrast 22:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Prinzie, Thomas, Ferran Suñer & Kristel Van Goethem
2022. From Crystal-clear to Limpide: Translating English [Noun+adj] Compound Adjectives with a Figurative-intensifying Noun into French. Research in Language 20:4 ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Egan, Thomas & Hildegunn Dirdal
2017. Lexis in contrast today. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Granularity in the Verbalization of Events and Objects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 233], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue