Cover not available

Article published In: Languages in Contrast
Vol. 19:1 (2019) ► pp.27–47

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

French and English lexical blends in contrast

ORCiD logo with link | University of Lyon
Published online: 9 May 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.16020.ren
Abstract
Two sets of 97 French and 374 English lexical units identified as lexical blends are examined from a contrastive perspective. It appears that English displays a wider variety of patterns than French does – a larger number of marginal types of lexical input combination, of lexical shortening and of phonological splitting. Striking dissimilarities between the two languages also include an inclination for the pattern of double inner shortening in English and the pattern of left-hand-side inner shortening in French, as well as a preference for semantic and phonological right-headedness in English and the absence of a preferred lateral head position in French.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Defining and collecting lexical blends
  • 3.Formal description
    • 3.1Lexical typology
    • 3.2Morphophonological typology
      • 3.2.1Patterns of lexical shortening
      • 3.2.2Segment overlap
      • 3.2.3Patterns of phonological splitting
  • 4.Headedness
    • 4.1Semantic headedness
    • 4.2Phonological headedness
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (34)
References
Ahn, S. 2014. Faithfulness conflict in Korean blends. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(1):21–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arcodia, G. F. and Montermini, F. 2012. Are reduced compounds compounds? Morphological and prosodic properties of reduced compounds in Russian and Mandarin Chinese. In Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Lexical Blending, V. Renner, F. Maniez and P. Arnaud (eds), 93–113. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arndt-Lappe, S. and Plag, I. 2013. The role of prosodic structure in the formation of English blends. English Language and Linguistics 17(3):537–563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bat-El, O. 1996. Selecting the best of the worst: The grammar of Hebrew blends. Phonology 13(3):283–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Blend. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, second edition, Volume 21, K. Brown (ed.), 66–70. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Blends. In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, G. Khan (ed.), 371–373. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, L. 2008. Exocentric compounds. Morphology 18(1):51–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beliaeva, N. 2014. Unpacking contemporary English blends: Morphological structure, meaning, processing. PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg, Th. 2009. Structure in Language: A Dynamic Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. 2007. The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, R. and Brdar, M. 2008. On the marginality of lexical blending. Jezikoslovije 9(1–2):171–194.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary, eighteenth edition, P. Roach, J. Setter and J. Esling (eds). 2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. 2000. Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology, U. Doleschal and A. M. Thornton (eds), 1–10. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Compound types. In The Representation and Processing of Compound Words, G. Libben and G. Jarema (eds), 23–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grand Robert de la langue française, online edition (version 3). 2013. Available at [URL] [last accessed 11 November 2016].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. 2006. Cognitive determinants of subtractive word formation: A corpus-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 17(4):535–558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Quantitative corpus data on blend formation: Psycho- and cognitive-linguistic perspectives. In Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Lexical Blending, V. Renner, F. Maniez and P. Arnaud (eds), 145–167. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halupka-Rešetar, S. and Lalić-Krstin, G. 2009. New blends in Serbian: Typological and headedness-related issues. Annual Review of the Faculty of Philosophy – University of Novi Sad 34(1):115–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. and Sims, A. D. 2010. Understanding Morphology, second edition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, E. 2013. An optimality-theoretic analysis of lexical blends in Korean. The Journal of Studies in Language 28(4):653–672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konieczna, E. 2012. Lexical blending in Polish: A result of the internationalisation of Slavic languages. In Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Lexical Blending, V. Renner, F. Maniez and P. Arnaud (eds), 51–73. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehrer, A. 2007. Blendalicious. In Lexical Creativity, Texts, and Contexts, J. Munat (ed.), 115–133. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longman Pronunciation Dictionary, third edition, J. C. Wells (ed.). 2008. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyster, R. 2006. Predictability in French gender attribution: A corpus analysis. Journal of French Language Studies 16(1):69–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mattiello, E. 2013. Extra-Grammatical Morphology in English: Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, D. G. 2014. English Lexicogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, online edition. Available at [URL][last accessed 11 November 2016].
Plag, I. 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ralli, A. and Xydopoulos, G. J. 2012. Blend formation in Modern Greek. In Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Lexical Blending, V. Renner, F. Maniez and P. Arnaud (eds), 35–50. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renner, V. 2006. Les composés coordinatifs en anglais contemporain. PhD Thesis, University of Lyon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. A study of element ordering in English coordinate lexical items. English Studies 95(4):441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronneberger-Sibold, E. 2012. Blending between grammar and universal cognitive principles: Evidence from German, Farsi, and Chinese. In Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Lexical Blending, V. Renner, F. Maniez and P. Arnaud (eds), 115–143. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scalise, S. and Fábregas, A. 2010. The head in compounding. In Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding, S. Scalise and I. Vogel (eds), 109–126. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, sixth edition. 2007 (electronic edition for iPhone and iPad, 2013). Available at [URL] [last accessed 11 November 2016].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Vasileanu, Monica & Anabella-Gloria Niculescu-Gorpin
2025. 241Romanian Libfixes in the Making. In Dynamics at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface, ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Meng, Qingnan & Martin Hilpert
2024. Measuring the semantic headedness of English blends with token-based semantic vector space modeling: a corpus-based study. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 39:4 ► pp. 1075 ff. DOI logo
Nedelcheva, Svetlana
2024. Creating Creative Blends In 21 Century (A Comparative Study Of English And Bulgarian. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT 12:2 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Vasileanu, Monica, Anabella-Gloria Niculescu-Gorpin & Cristina-Andreea Radu-Bejenaru
2024. Keep calm and carry on blending: Experimental insights into Romanian lexical blending. Word Structure 17:1-2 ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Vasileanu, Monica, Cristian Moroianu & Cristina-Andreea Radu-Bejenaru
2023. Lexical Blending in Romanian Academic Dictionaries. Philologica Jassyensia 38:2 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Grlj, Tina
2022. Blending as a Word-Formation Process. Journal for Foreign Languages 14:1 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Villalva, Alina & Rafael Dias Minussi
2022. Description and analysis of a Portuguese blend corpus. Corpus :23 DOI logo
Renner, Vincent
2020. An ecosystem view of English word-formation. The Mental Lexicon 15:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Renner, Vincent
2023. Blending. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tarasova, Elizaveta & Natalia Beliaeva
2020. On twittizens and city residents . The Mental Lexicon 15:1 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Jeremić, Jelena Danilović
2019. Ada Böhmerová, Blending As Lexical Amalgamation and Its Onomatological and. Lexis DOI logo
Balteiro, Isabel & Laurie Bauer
2018. List of references. Lexis :14 DOI logo
Renwick, Adam & Vincent Renner
2018. New lexical blends in The Simpsons: a formal analysis of English nonce formations and their French translations. Lexis :14 DOI logo
Tomić, Gorica
2018. Headedness in contemporary English slang blends. Lexis :14 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue