Cover not available

Article published In: Genre- and register-related discourse features in contrast
Edited by Marie-Aude Lefer and Svetlana Vogeleer
[Languages in Contrast 14:1] 2014
► pp. 127–161

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Loving and hating the movies in English, German and Spanish

 | Simon Fraser University (Canada)
 | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain)
 | University of Alberta (Canada)
Published online: 4 March 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.07tab
We present a quantitative analysis of evaluative language in a genre in which it is particularly prominent, that of movie reviews. The data chosen are non-professional consumer-generated reviews written in English, German and Spanish. The reviews are analysed in terms of the categories of Attitude and Graduation within the Appraisal framework (Martin and White, 2005). A number of similarities in the distribution of the Appraisal subcategories were found across the three languages, such as the high frequency of Appreciation and the narrow relationship between the global polarity of the reviews and the individual polarity of the spans. More importantly, the analysis uncovers a number of cross-linguistic distributional differences, which may be explained in terms of a wide array of factors, such as lexicogrammar, word order, argumentative style or sociocultural reasons.
References (52)
Aikhenvald, A. 2004. Evidentiality . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1981. “Discourse in the Novel” [Translated by C. Emerson and M. Holquist]. In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin, M. Holquist (ed), 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banfield, A. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction . Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batson, C., Shaw, L. and Oleson, K. 1992. “Differentiating Affect, Mood, and Emotion: Toward Functionally Based Conceptual Distinctions”. In Emotion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, M. Clark (ed), 294–326. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Finegan, E. 1988. “Adverbial Stance Types in English.” Discourse Processes 11(1):1–34. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
and Finegan, E. 1989. “Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect”. Text 9(1):93–124. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. and Fleischman, S. (eds). 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carretero, M. and Taboada, M. (to appear-a). “The Annotation of Appraisal: How Attitude and Epistemic Modality Overlap in English and Spanish Consumer Reviews”. In Thinking Modally: English and Contrastive Studies on Modality , J.R. Zamorano (ed). Berne: Peter Lang.
and Taboada, M. (to appear-b). “Appraisal in English and Spanish Consumer Reviews of Books and Movies: a Contrastive Study of the Expression of Graduation within the Scope of Attitude”. In Evaluation in Context , G. Thompson and L. Alba-Juez (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
and Zamorano, J.R. (2013). “Annotating English Adverbials for the Categories of Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality”. In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality , J. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero, J. Arús and J. Van der Auwera (eds), 317–356. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. 1986. Evidentiality: the Linguistic Coding of Epistemology . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coffin, C. 1997. “Constructing and Giving Value to the Past: an Investigation into Secondary School History”. In Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, F. Christie and J.R. Martin (eds), 196–230. London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
and O’Halloran, K. 2006. “The Role of Appraisal and Corpora in Detecting Covert Evaluation”. Functions of Language 13(1):77–110. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eggins, S. and Martin, J.R. 1997. “Genres and Registers of Discourse”. In Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: a Multidisciplinary Introduction, T.A. van Dijk (ed), 230–256. London: Sage. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
and Slade, D. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation . London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1975. Learning How to Mean . London: Edward Arnold.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1st edition). London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1989. “Context of Situation”. In Language, Context and Text , M.A.K. Halliday and R. Hasan (eds), 3–14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
and Matthiessen, Ch. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar ( 3rd edition). London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, J. 2006. “Communicative Styles in English and German”. European Journal of English Studies 10(3):249–267. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. and Thompson, G. (eds). 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Distance and the Construction of Discourse . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itakura, H. and Tsui, A.B. 2011. “Evaluation in Academic Discourse: Managing Criticism in Japanese and English Book Reviews”. Journal of Pragmatics 43(5):1366–1379. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson, S. 1998. “Loving and Hating in English and Norwegian: a Corpus-based Contrastive Study”. In Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy. Essays Presented to Kirsten Haastrup on the Occasion of her Sixtieth Birthday , D. Albrechtsen, B. Henriksen, I.M. Mees and E. Poulsen (eds), 93–103. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, Nora. (2007). La construcción discursiva del evento conflictivo en las noticias por televisión . PhD Dissertation, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 1990. “Subjectification”. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1):5–38. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Bing. 2012. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining : Morgan and Claypool..
Love, K. 2006. “APPRAISAL in Online Discussions of Literary Texts”. Text and Talk 26(2):217–244. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macken-Horarik, M. 2003).“APPRAISAL and the Special Instructiveness of Narrative”. Text 23(2):285–312.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, W. and Thompson, S. 1988. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization”. Text 8(3):243–281. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. 1996. “Evaluating Disruption: Symbolising Theme in Junior Secondary Narrative”. In Literacy in Society, R. Hasan and G. Williams(eds), 124–171. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English”. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Distance and the Construction of Discourse, S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds), 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. “Introduction: Special Issue on Appraisal”. Text 23(2):171–181. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
and White, P. 2005. The Language of Evaluation . New York: Palgrave.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, R. 2003. “An Analysis of APPRAISAL in Childbirth Narratives with Special Consideration of Gender and Storytelling Style”. Text 23(2):211–237. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Painter, C. 2003. “Developing Attitude: An Ontogenetic Perspective on APPRAISAL”. Text 23(2):183–209. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, F. 1986. Mood and Modality . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pang, B. and Lee, L. 2008. “Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis”. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1–2):1–135. .
Portner, P. 2009. Modality . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, M. 2008. “SFU Review Corpus [Corpus]”. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University. Available at: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. “Stages in an Online Review Genre”. Text and Talk 31(2):247–269. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K. and Stede, M. 2011. “Lexicon-based Methods for Sentiment Analysis”. Computational Linguistics 37(2):267–307. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, M. and Carretero, M. 2012. “Contrastive Analyses of Evaluation in Text: Key Issues in the Design of an Annotation System for Attitude Applicable to Consumer Reviews in English and Spanish”. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 61(1–3):275–295. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
and Gómez-González, M. de los Á. 2012. “Discourse Markers and Coherence Relations: Comparison across Markers, Languages and Modalities”. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6(1–3):17–41. .
and Grieve, J. 2004. “Analyzing Appraisal Automatically”. In Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text (AAAI Technical Report SS-04–07), 158–161. Stanford University, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. 1995. “Subjectification in Grammaticalisation”. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, D. Stein and S. Wright (eds), 1–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: a Reassessment”. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization , K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte and H. Cuyckens (eds), 29–74. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trnavac, R. and Taboada, M. 2012. “The Contribution of Nonveridical Rhetorical Relations to Evaluation in Discourse”. Language Sciences 34(3):301–318. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, P. 1998. Telling Media Tales: the News Story as Rhetoric . Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003a.“Beyond Modality and Hedging: a Dialogic View of the Language of Intersubjective Stance”. Text 23(2):259–284. .
2003b. “An Introductory Course in Appraisal Analysis”. Available at Appraisal website [URL]l [Retrieved 16 March 2009].
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Labrador, Belén & Noelia Ramón
2024. Positive Evaluation in the Translation of Online Promotional Discourse in the Cheese Industry. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 67:3 ► pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Parviz, Muhammed, Alireza Jalilifar & Alexanne Don
2024. Unpacking Evaluative Meaning-Making Resources in Verbal Movie Descriptions: A Comparative Study of Native and Non-Native English Speakers. Sage Open 14:4 DOI logo
Ho, Mei-ching
2022. A corpus-pragmatics approach to evaluation in professor reviews. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 48:1 ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Pérez Blanco, María & Marlén Izquierdo
2022. Engaging with customer’s emotions. Languages in Contrast 22:1 ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Sazzed, Salim
2022. Impact of demography on linguistic aspects and readability of reviews and performances of sentiment classifiers. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 2:2 ► pp. 100135 ff. DOI logo
Oteíza, Teresa, Claudia Castro & Claudio Pinuer
2021. Graduating political crisis and violence in the discourse of history: The role of Spanish suffixes. Discourse Studies 23:3 ► pp. 296 ff. DOI logo
Farnia, Maryam, Masoud Saeedi & Zahra Ataei
2020. A Cross-disciplinary Study on Evaluative Strategies in Research Articles Conclusion Sections. International Journal of Research in English Education 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hasselgård, Hilde
2020. Corpus-based contrastive studies. Languages in Contrast 20:2 ► pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Kolhatkar, Varada, Hanhan Wu, Luca Cavasso, Emilie Francis, Kavan Shukla & Maite Taboada
2020. The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments. Corpus Pragmatics 4:2 ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Sanahuges, Carme & Hortènsia Curell
2020. Responding to Trouble: An Interactional Approach to Empathy In Catalan and English. Corpus Pragmatics 4:4 ► pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Trnavac, Radoslava & Maite Taboada
2020. Positive Appraisal in Online News Comments. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Fronhofer, Nina-Maria
2019. Chapter 9. My anger was justified surely?. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff, Maite Taboada & Radoslava Trnavac
2019. The semantics of evaluational adjectives. Functions of Language 26:3 ► pp. 308 ff. DOI logo
Fuoli, Matteo
2018. A stepwise method for annotating appraisal. Functions of Language 25:2 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Speyer, Augustin & Anita Fetzer
2018. “Well would you believe it, I have failed the exam again”. Pragmatics and Society 9:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Aloy Mayo, María & Maite Taboada
2017. Evaluation in political discourse addressed to women: Appraisal analysis of Cosmopolitan’s online coverage of the 2014 US midterm elections. Discourse, Context & Media 18 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
2016. A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue