Cover not available

Article published In: Genre- and register-related discourse features in contrast
Edited by Marie-Aude Lefer and Svetlana Vogeleer
[Languages in Contrast 14:1] 2014
► pp. 35–57

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Cross-linguistic register studies

Theoretical and methodological considerations

 | RWTH Aachen University, Germany
Published online: 4 March 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.03neu
This paper discusses register as a meaningful unit of contrastive linguistics and translation studies. Drawing on systemic functional register theory, it categorizes different approaches to register-oriented cross-linguistic studies emphasizing either the comparison of contrasted features organized by register or that of registers using features as operationalizations. The approach is exemplified with the help of sample analyses of the English-German CroCo Corpus, a corpus containing originals and translations from eight different registers. In order to account for the systematic contrastive differences in frequencies of compared features, the magnitude of difference between register-specific and register-neutral frequencies is contrasted. The paper finally discusses complex register-specific combinations of indicators and shows how these help to identify translation properties.
References (39)
1996. “Corpus-based Translation Studies: the Challenges that Lie Ahead”. In Terminology, LSP and Translation. Studies in Language Engineering in Honour of Juan C. Sager, H. Somers (ed.), 175–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baroni, M. and Evert, S. 2009. “Statistical Methods for Corpus Exploitation”. In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook , A. Lüdeling and M. Kytö (eds), 777–803. Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 29.2. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernardini, S. 2007. “Collocations in Translated Language: Combining Parallel, Comparable and Reference Corpora”. In Proceedings from the Corpus Linguistics Conference Series . University of Birmingham, UK. Available at: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. Dimensions of Register Variation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, T.R. 1999. Doing Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. An Integrated Approach to Research Design, Measurement and Statistics . London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diwersy, S., Evert, S. and Neumann, S. 2014. “A Weakly Supervised Multivariate Approach to the Study of Language Variation”. In Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis. Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech , B. Szmrecsanyi and B. Wälchli (eds), 174–204. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Evert, S. and Neumann, S. In preparation. “The Impact of Translation Direction on the Characteristics of Translated Texts: a Multivariate Analysis for English and German”. In New Ways of Analysing Translational Behaviour in Corpus-Based Translation Studies , G. De Sutter, I. Delaere and M.-A. Lefer (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton..
Frawley, W. 1984. “Prolegomenon to a Theory of Translation”. In Translation. Literary, Linguistic, and Philosophical Perspectives , W. Frawley (ed.), 159–175. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., Lerot, J. and Petch-Tyson, S. (eds) 2003. Corpus-based Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies . Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gregory, M. and Carroll, S. 1978. Language and Situation. Language Varieties and Their Social Contexts . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning . London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. 1989. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar . (3rd edition). London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and James, Z. 1993. “A Quantitative Study of Polarity and Primary Tense in the English Finite Clause”. In Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse , J. McH. Sinclair, M. Hoey and G. Fox (eds), 32–66. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen-Schirra, S., Neumann, S. and Steiner, E. 2012. Cross-linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations – Insights from the Language Pair English-German . Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, J. 1997. Translation Quality Assessment. A Model Revisited . Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
and Oksefjell, S. (eds). 1998. Corpora and Cross-linguistic Research: Theory, Method and Case Studies . Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, E. and Gast, V. 2012. Understanding English-German Contrasts . (3rd edition). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kunz, K. and Steiner, E. 2013. “Cohesive Substitution in English and German: a Contrastive and Corpus-based Perspective”. In Advances in Corpus-based Contrastive Linguistics . Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson , K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds), 201–231. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. 1982/1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization . München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. 1993. “Register in the Round: Diversity in a Unified Theory of Register Analysis”. In Register Analysis. Theory and Practice , M. Ghadessy (ed), 221–292. London: Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesbitt, C. and Plum, G. 1988. “Probabilities in a Systemic-functional Grammar: the Clause Complex in English”. In New Developments in Systemic Linguistics. Theory and Application , R.P. Fawcett and D. Young (eds), vol. 21, 6–38. London: Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neumann, S. 2011. “Contrasting Frequency Variation of Grammatical Features”. In Grammatik und Korpora 2009. Dritte Internationale Konferenz , M. Konopka, J. Kubczak, C. Mair, F. Štícha and U. H. Waßner (eds), 389–410. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. “Applying Register Analysis to Varieties of English”. In Anglistentag 2011, Freiburg , M. Fludernik and B. Kohlmann (eds), 75–94. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Contrastive Register Variation. A Quantitative Approach to the Comparison of English and German . Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2004. WordSmith Tools Version 4 . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steiner, E. 2001. “Intralingual and Interlingual Versions of a Text – How Specific Is the Notion of ‘Translation’?” In Exploring Translation and Multilingual Text Production. Beyond Content , E. Steiner and C. Yallop (eds), 161–190. Mouton de Gruyter. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Translated Texts: Properties, Variants, Evaluations . Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. M.1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. and Wälchli, B. (eds). 2014. Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis. Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teich, E. 2003. Cross-linguistic Variation in System and Text. A Methodology for the Investigation of Translations and Comparable Texts . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ure, J. 1971. “Lexical Density and Register Differentiation”. In Applications of Linguistics: Selected Papers of the Second International Congress of Applied Linguistics , Cambridge 1969, G.E. Perren and J.L.M. Trim (eds), 443–452. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werlich, E. 1976. A Text Grammar of English . Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Alasmri, Ibrahim
2024. Cross-linguistic influence of English on conjunction system in translated Arabic: a multifactorial corpus-based study. Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
SHAKIR, MUHAMMAD
2024. An exploratory investigation of functional variation in South Asian online Englishes. English Language and Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Woodin, Greg & Bodo Winter
2024. Numbers in Context: Cardinals, Ordinals, and Nominals in American English. Cognitive Science 48:6 DOI logo
Woodin, Greg, Bodo Winter, Jeannette Littlemore, Marcus Perlman & Jack Grieve
2024. Large-scale patterns of number use in spoken and written English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Neumann, Stella & Stefan Evert
2021. A register variation perspective on varieties of English. In Corpus-based approaches to register variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 103], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Dupont, Maïté
2020. Placement patterns of English and French conjunctive adjuncts of contrast. Languages in Contrast 20:2 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Granger, Sylviane & Marie-Aude Lefer
2020. Introduction. Languages in Contrast 20:2 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Xiaomin, Haidee Kotze (Kruger) & Jing Fang
2020. Explicitation in children’s literature translated from English to Chinese: a corpus-based study of personal pronouns. Perspectives 28:5 ► pp. 717 ff. DOI logo
Bohmann, Axel
2019. Variation in English Worldwide, DOI logo
Kruger, Haidee
2019. That Again: A Multivariate Analysis of the Factors Conditioning Syntactic Explicitness in Translated English. Across Languages and Cultures 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Alasmri, Ibrahim & Haidee Kruger
2018. Conjunctive markers in translation from English to Arabic: a corpus-based study. Perspectives 26:5 ► pp. 767 ff. DOI logo
Hützen, Nicole & Tatiana Serbina
2018. Lexical chains and topic continuity in the register of popular scientific writing. Pragmatics and Society 9:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Kruger, Haidee & Bertus van Rooy
2018. Register variation in written contact varieties of English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 39:2 ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Kruger, Haidee & Bertus van Rooy
2016. Constrained language. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 37:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Dupont, Maïté & Sandrine Zufferey
2017. Methodological issues in the use of directional parallel corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 270 ff. DOI logo
Egan, Thomas & Hildegunn Dirdal
2017. Lexis in contrast today. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 286], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Conjunctive Markers of Contrast in English and French [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 99], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue