Article published In: Languages in Contrast
Vol. 12:2 (2012) ► pp.251–276
A contrastive study of nominalization in the systemic functional framework
Published online: 29 October 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.12.2.08mik
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.12.2.08mik
This paper presents a contrastive analysis of nominalization in Italian and Slovene within the framework of systemic functional grammar as described by M.A.K. Halliday and his colleagues. Nominalization is viewed as a type of grammatical metaphor whereby processes which are congruently realized by verbs are metaphorically realized by nouns expressing the same process as those verbs. The frequency of nominalization varies greatly among languages as well as among genres within a language, and may cause problems when two languages interact, e.g. in translation, especially when one of the two languages seems less prone to use this kind of grammatical metaphor than the other. In the present study, an analysis is carried out of a 2.5 million-token parallel corpus of Italian source texts and their Slovene translations, particularly with regard to the different translation equivalents that may appear in the translated texts, which is partly dependent of the type of process involved.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Gentil, Guillaume
Gentil, Guillaume & Fanny Meunier
2018. A systemic functional linguistic approach to usage-based research and instruction. In Usage-inspired L2 Instruction [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 49], ► pp. 267 ff.
Lee Eunjung & 김미란
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
