Review published In: Contrastive Linguistics and other Approaches to Language Comparison
Edited by Matthias Hüning and Barbara Schlücker
[Languages in Contrast 12:1] 2012
► pp. 93–101
Book review
. Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure. Amsterdam / Phildadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010. xii + 306 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 8784 7 . [Linguistics Today, 165].
Reviewed by
Published online: 12 January 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.12.1.07rie
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.12.1.07rie
References (11)
Büring, D. 2008. “What’s New (and What’s Given) in the Theory of Focus?”. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Meeting 2008. Berkeley CA.
Krifka, M. 2006. “Association with Focus Phrases”. In The Architecture of Focus, eds. V. Molnár and S. Winkler. 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Li, C. and Thompson, S. 1976. “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language”. In Subject and Topic, ed. C. Li. 457–489. New York: Academic Press.
Pierrehumbert, J. and J. Hirschberg. 1990. “The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse”. In Intentions in Communication, eds. R. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. Pollack. 271–311. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Riester, A., and H. Kamp. 2010. “Squiggly Issues: Alternative Sets, Complex DPs, and Intensionality. In Logic, Language and Meaning”. Revised Selected Papers from the 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, eds. M. Aloni et al.. 374–383. Berlin: Springer.