Cover not available

Review published In: Languages in Contrast
Vol. 25:1 (2025) ► pp.148–156

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required
Book review

Jacqueline Guillemin-Flescher. Linguistique contrastive : énonciation et activité langagière. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2023.

Reviewed by
 | University of Picardie Jules Verne, CORPUS EA 4295, France
Published online: 29 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00053.lan
References (21)
References
Baumer, E. 2015. Noms propres et anaphores nominales : étude comparée des chaînes de référence en anglais et en français. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumer, E. and Lansari, L. 2023. Relations intersubjectives dans le discours journalistique : une étude contrastive anglais/français. In Les mutations des discours médiatiques : approche contrastive et interculturelle, D. Dias and N. Rentel (eds), 33–50. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter-Thomas, S. 2014. Valeurs et fonctions des éléments initiaux commentaires. Analyse contrastive d’un corpus d’articles de recherche en économie [online] Available at [URL] [last accessed 20 October 2015].
Celle, A. 2009. Question, mise en question : La traduction de l’interrogation dans le discours théorique. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, XIV1: 39–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Questions as indirect speech acts in surprise contexts. In Tense, aspect, modality, evidentiality: crosslinguistic perspectives, D. Ayoun, A. Celle and L. Lansari (eds), 213–238. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celle, A., Jugnet, A., Lansari, L. and Tyler, P. 2019. Interrogatives in Surprise Contexts in English. In Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics, Consciousness and Emotion Series, A. Celle and N. Depraz (eds), 118–137. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chuquet, H. 2000. L’imparfait français est-il traduisible en anglais ? Le cas de l’imparfait de rupture. Linguistique contrastive et traduction 51: 65–85. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chuquet, H. and Paillard, M. 1987. Approche linguistique des problèmes de traduction. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Glossaire de linguistique contrastive. Paris: OphrysGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culioli, A. 1990. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation 11. Paris and Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999a. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation 21. Paris and Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999b. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation 31. Paris and Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation 41. Paris and Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. 2010. Comparable and translation corpora in crosslinguistic research. Design, analysis and applications. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University 21: 14–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillemin-Flescher, J. 1981. Syntaxe comparée du français et de l’anglais. Problèmes de traduction. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanchett, V. and Lansari, L. in press. The Roles of Initial Elements in Real-life Stories: A Contrastive Study of English and French. In Hommage à Jacqueline Guillemin-Flescher, A. Leroux et Françoise Doro-Mégy (eds). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes,
Johansson, M. and E. Suomela-Salmi. 2008. Enonciation: French pragmatic approaches, Handbook of Pragmatics Online 121: 1–38. Current revision 2011. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poncharal, B. 2000. Problèmes de traduction de certains prédicats subjectifs au Discours Indirect Libre. Linguistique contrastive et traduction 51: 3–31. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. La traduction de l’anaphore dans la prose de pensée. Palimpsestes, 93–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ranger, G. 2018. Discourse markers. An enunciative approach. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinay, J.-P. and Darbelnet, J. 1958. Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. Méthode de traduction. Paris: Didier / Montréal: Beauchemin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue