Cover not available

Article published In: Comparing Crosslinguistic Complexity
Edited by Jenny Ström Herold and Magnus Levin
[Languages in Contrast 24:1] 2024
► pp. 33–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The Spanish subjunctive mood and its English correspondences

A case for complexity across languages

 | University of León, Spain
 | University of León, Spain
Published online: 16 February 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00034.ram
Abstract
Corpus-based contrastive studies have successfully addressed the empirical study of crosslinguistic similarities and differences and may also contribute to understanding complexity across languages. This paper aims at (dis)proving whether the Spanish subjunctive mood shows greater complexity than its English correspondences as translations or sources of the Spanish subjunctive forms. It also explores a trade-off between language levels, i.e., whether higher morphological complexity is linked to syntactic and lexical complexity. The data come from a bidirectional English-Spanish corpus, and the word-alignment-based metric system has been used to quantify morphological complexity. Syntactic and lexical complexity were also investigated and computed using tests of statistical significance. Results corroborate that Spanish presents higher complexity in this verbal area in all three levels, morphological, syntactic, and lexical: the hypothesized trade-off between higher morphological complexity on the one hand, and lower syntactic and lexical complexity on the other is not validated by our data.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Complexity
    • 2.1Language complexity
    • 2.2Measuring complexity
  • 3.The subjunctive in English and Spanish
  • 4.Data and method
    • 4.1The bidirectional corpus
    • 4.2Method
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1English morphological correspondences of Spanish subjunctives
    • 5.2Clause types including subjunctives in English and Spanish
    • 5.3Lexical licensers in subjunctive environments in English and Spanish
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (63)
References
Agudelo Montoya, C. L. and Ramírez Osorio, J. F. 2015. El subjuntivo: Un estudio comparativo español-francés. Manizales: Universidad de Caldas. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arias Bedoya, F. Y. 1994. Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arias, B. 2021. El subjuntivo en español e italiano: Una descripción contrastiva. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica 371: 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M. 1993. Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies: Implications and Applications. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, M. Baker, G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 233–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bentz, C. and Alikaniotis, D. 2016. The Word Entropy of Natural Languages. arXiv:1606.06996. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bentz, C., Ruzsics, T., Koplenig, A. and Samardžić, T. 2016. A Comparison between Morphological Complexity Measures: Typological Data vs. Language Corpora. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity (CL4LC). Osaka, Japan, 11 December 2016. 142–153.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergs, A. and Heine, L. 2010. Mood in English. In Mood in the Languages of Europe, B. Rothstein and R. Thieroff (eds), 103–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. 1986. Shifts of Cohesion and Coherence in Translation. In Interlingual and Intercultural Communication, J. House and S. Blum-Kulka (eds), 17–35. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1970. Modes of Modality in Spanish and English. Romance Philology 231: 572–580.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borrego, J., Prieto, E. and Gómez, J. J. 1985. El subjuntivo. Valores y usos. Madrid: SGEL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, I. 1990. Las bases gramaticales de la alternancia modal. Repaso y balance. In Indicativo y subjuntivo, I. Bosque (ed.), 13–66. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. and Pagliuca, W. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collentine, J. 2010. The Acquisition and Teaching of the Spanish Subjunctive: An Update on Current Findings. Hispania 93(1): 39–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Çöltekin, C. and Rama, T. 2022. What do Complexity Measures Measure? Correlating and Validating Corpus-Based Measures of Morphological Complexity. Linguistics Vanguard 9(s1): 27–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cueva-Lobelle, A. 2018. Aproximación al modo subjuntivo en español desde una perspectiva multivariable. Folios 481: 73–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, I. and Reed, S. 2006. Mood and Modality in English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds), 269–290. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehret, K. 2017. An Information-Theoretic Approach to Language Complexity: Variation in Naturalistic Corpora. PhD Thesis, University of Freiburg.
Ehret, K. and Szmrecsanyi, B. 2016. An Information-Theoretic Approach to Assess Linguistic Complexity. In Complexity and Isolation, R. Baechler and G. Seiler (eds), 71–94. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehret, K., Bentz, C. and Berdicevskis, A. 2021. Meaning and Measures: Interpreting and Evaluating Complexity Metrics. Frontiers in Communication 61 (article 640510). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, C. 1991. Algunas reflexiones sobre el concepto de modalidad. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 71: 93–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. 1995. What is Complexity? Complexity 1(1): 16–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Calvo, J. M. 1995. Sobre el modo verbal en español. Anuario de Estudios Filológicos 181: 177–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. and Lefer, M.-A. 2020. A Two-Pronged Approach to Corpus-Based Crosslinguistic Studies. Languages in Contrast 20(2): 167–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guzmán Naranjo, M. 2017. The se-ra Alternation in Spanish Subjunctive. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13(1): 97–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, B. 2018. Corpus Linguistics and Sociolinguistics. A Study of Variation and Change in the Modal Systems of World Englishes. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. 2009. An Efficiency Theory of Complexity and Related Phenomena. In Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, G. Sampson, D. Gil and P. Trudgill (eds), 252–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K. 1988. Illocution, Mood and Modality in a Functional Grammar of Spanish. Journal of Semantics 6(1): 227–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housen, A., De Clercq, B., Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. 2019. Multiple Approaches to Complexity in Second Language Research. Second Language Research 35(1): 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Igualada, B. 1989. Nueva hipótesis sobre el subjuntivo en español. Estudios Románicos 41: 643–663.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiménez Juliá, T. 1989. Modalidad, modo verbal y modus clausal en español. Verba 161: 175–214.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juola, P. 1998. Measuring Linguistic Complexity: The Morphological Tier. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 51: 206–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Assessing Linguistic Complexity. In Language Complexity. Typology, Contact, Change, M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki and F. Karlsson (eds), 89–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kettunen, K. 2014. Can Type-Token Ratio be Used to Show Morphological Complexity of Languages? Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 21(3): 223–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klaudy, K. 2009. Explicitation. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (2nd ed), M. Baker and G. Saldanha (eds), 104–108. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koplenig, A., Meyer, P., Wolfer, S. and Müller-Spitzer, C. 2017. The Statistical Trade-Off between Word Order and Word Structure – Large-Scale Evidence for the Principle of Least Effort. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0173614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korzen, I. 2021. Are Some Languages More Complex than Others? On Text Complexity and how to Measure it. Globe. A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication 121: 18–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laca, B. 2010. Mood in Spanish. In Mood in the Languages of Europe, B. Rothstein and R. Thieroff (eds), 198–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 2017. Complexity Theory: The Lessons Continue. In Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman, L. Ortega and Z.-H. Han (eds), 11–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C. and Smith, N. 2009. Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lempel, A. and Ziv, J. 1976. On the Complexity of an Individual Sequence. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 22(1): 75–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindström, E. 2008. Language Complexity and Interlinguistic Difficulty. In Language Complexity. Typology, Contact, Change, M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki and F. Karlsson (eds), 217–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miestamo, M. 2008. Grammatical Complexity in Crosslinguistic Perspective. In Language Complexity. Typology, Contact, Change, M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki and F. Karlsson (eds), 23–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moessner, L. 2020. The History of the Present English Subjunctive: A Corpus-Based Study of Mood and Modality. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno, J. 1991. Curso universitario de lingüística general. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. and Preston, L. B. (eds). 2014. Measuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nowikow, W. 2016. Los factores (morfo)sintácticos semánticos en los modos eslavos y románicos: Del sistema al funcionamiento (el caso del español y del polaco). In El español a través del tiempo. Estudios ofrecidos a Rafael Cano Aguilar, A. López Serena, A. Narbona Jiménez and S. del Rey Quesada (eds), 643–652. Sevilla: Editorial Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Sobre la bifuncionalidad del modo subjuntivo: ¿Función sintáctica o/y función semántica? Moenia 231: 61–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Otaola Olano, C. 1988. La modalidad (con especial referencia a la lengua española). Revista de Filología Español 68(1/2): 97–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallotti, G. 2015. A Simple View of Linguistic Complexity. Second Language Research 31(1): 117–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez, M. 1999. El modo en las subordinadas relativas y adverbiales. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds), 3253–3322. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, S., Cacoullos, R., Dion, N., Berlinck, R., Digesto, S., Lacasse, D. and Steuck, J. 2018. Variation and Grammaticalization in Romance: A Cross-Linguistic Study of the Subjunctive. In Manual of Romance Sociolinguistics, W. Ayres-Bennett and J. Carruthers (eds), 217–252. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Porto Dapena, J. A. 1991. Del indicativo al subjuntivo. Valores y usos de los modos del verbo. Madrid: Arco.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RAE, Real Academia Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Barcelona: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Restorick Elordi, A. K. 2012. Interpretation of the French and Spanish Subjunctive by L1, L2, and L3 Speakers: Contexts where Mood can Alternate without Ungrammaticality. PhD Thesis. [URL]
Ridruejo, E. 1999. Modo y modalidad. El modo en las subordinadas sustantivas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds), 3209–3251. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, R. and Schwenter, S. A. 2019. Entrenchment and Persistence in Language Change: The Spanish Past Subjunctive. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 15(1): 167–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sastre, M. 1999. El subjuntivo en español. Madrid: Colegio de España.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, K. 2008. Complexity Trade-Offs in Core Argument Marking. In Language Complexity. Typology, Contact, Change, M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki and F. Karlsson (eds), 67–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Language Universals and Linguistic Complexity. Three Case Studies in Core Argument Marking. PhD Thesis, University of Helsinki. [URL]
Van der Auwera, J. and Plungian, V. A. 1998. Modality’s Semantic Map. Linguistic Typology 21: 79–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziv, J. and Lempel, A. 1977. A Universal Algorithm for Sequential Data Compression. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 23(3): 337–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue