Cover not available

Article published In: The Complementary Contribution of Comparable and Parallel Corpora to Crosslinguistic Studies
Edited by Sylviane Granger and Marie-Aude Lefer
[Languages in Contrast 20:2] 2020
► pp. 263–287

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Placement patterns of English and French conjunctive adjuncts of contrast

The impact of register

ORCiD logo with link | Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Published online: 6 October 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00018.dup
Abstract
In many languages, conjunctive adjuncts (e.g. however, therefore) are syntactically mobile. Several corpus-based contrastive studies have shown that languages differ in the positions that they tend to prefer for conjunctive adjuncts. However, the studies available have formulated general cross-linguistic differences in placement for languages as wholes, without considering the possibility that such contrasts may be influenced by register. The objective of this paper is to investigate and compare the placement patterns of English and French conjunctive adjuncts of contrast in two written registers (viz. editorials and research articles) in order to measure the impact of register variation on the differences between these two languages. The results suggest that, although register variation plays a significant role on placement within each language system, language is a better predictor of placement than register, since cross-linguistic differences in placement between English and French are stable across communicative situations. In a second stage, the results obtained in the comparable corpus study are complemented with the analysis of translation data, with a view to assessing the translators’ degree of awareness of the inherent word order preferences of the target language. The study is grounded in the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics and relies on the notions of Theme and Rheme to describe conjunctive adjunct placement.
Article outline
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2.A Systemic Functional approach to conjunctive adjunct placement
    • 2.1Theme and Rheme in Systemic Functional Linguistics
    • 2.2Classification of conjunctive adjunct positions
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Comparable corpus study
    • 3.2Translation corpus study
  • 4.Conjunctive adjunct placement in English and French: A cross-register comparison
    • 4.1Register effects
    • 4.2Register and language effects compared
  • 5.Conjunctive adjunct placement in French>English translation
    • 5.1Original vs. translated English news
    • 5.2Conjunctive adjunct placement in the French source texts and the English target texts
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
Altenberg, B. 2006. The Function of Adverbial Connectors in Second Initial Position in English and Swedish. In Pragmatic Markers in Contrast, K. Aijmer and A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen (eds), 11–37. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balažic Bulc, T. and Gorjanc, V. 2015. The Position of Connectors in Slovene and Croatian Student Academic Writing: A Corpus-Based Approach. In Meaning Making in Text, S. Starc, C. Jones and A. Maiorani (eds), 51–71. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banks, D. 2017. A Systemic Functional Grammar of French. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, M. 2008. Parallel Texts and Corpus-Based Contrastive Analysis. In Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, M. Gómez González, J. Mackenzie and E. González Álvarez (eds), 101–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berry, M. 1996. What is Theme? A(nother) Personal View. In Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations, M. Berry, C. Butler, R. Fawcett and G. Huang (eds), 1–64. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. and Stone, C. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burnard, L. (ed.). 2008. Reference Guide to the BNC Baby. Available at [URL] [last accessed 20 January 2020].
Caffarel, A. 2006. A Systemic Functional Grammar of French: From Grammar to Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffarel-Cayron, A. and Rechniewski, E. 2014. Exploring the Generic Structure of French Editorials from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Journal of World Languages 1(1): 18–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
forthcoming. Conjunctive Markers of Contrast in English and French. From Syntax to Lexis and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eggins, S. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elgemark, A. 2017. To the very End. A Contrastive Study of N-Rhemes in English and Swedish Translations. PhD Thesis, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fries, P. 1994. On Theme, Rheme and Discourse Goals. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, M. Coulthard (ed.), 229–249. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. A Personal View of Theme. In Thematic Development in English Texts, M. Ghadessy (ed.), 1–19. London: Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. 1969. Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 199–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. 1989. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasselgård, H. 2010. Adjunct Adverbials in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. 1998. Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30(4): 437–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kunz, K. and Lapshinova-Koltunski, E. 2014. Cohesive Conjunctions in English and German: Systemic Contrasts and Textual Differences. In Recent Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Developing and Exploiting Corpora, L. Vandelanotte, K. Davidse, C. Gentens and D. Kimps (eds), 229–262. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lefer, M.-A. and Vogeleer, S. (eds). 2014. Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast. Special issue of Languages in Contrast 14(1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenker, U. 2014. Knitting and Splitting Information: Medial Placement of Linking Adverbials in the History of English. In Contact, Variation and Change in the History of English, S. Pfenninger, O. Timofeeva, A.-C. Gardner, A. Honkapohja, M. Hundt and D. Schreier (eds), 11–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morel, M.-A. and Danon-Boileau, L. 1998. Grammaire de l’Intonation. L’Exemple du Français Oral. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roze, C., Danlos, L. and Muller, P. 2012. LEXCONN: A French Lexicon of Discourse Connectives. Discours 101. Available at [URL] [last accessed 31 January 2020].
Scott, M. 2012. WordSmith Tools 61. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teich, E. 2003. Cross-Linguistic Variation in System and Text. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, G. and Hunston, S. 2006. System and Corpus: Two Traditions with a Common Ground. In System and Corpus: Exploring Connections, G. Thompson and S. Hunston (eds), 1–14. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Theme, Subject and the Unfolding of Text. In Text Type and Texture, G. Forey and G. Thompson (eds), 45–69. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderauwera, R. 1985. Dutch Novels Translated into English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Brysbaert, Jorina & Karen Lahousse
2022. Marking Contrastive Topics in a Topic Shift Context: Contrastive Adverbs versus Emphatic Pronouns. Discours :31 DOI logo
Brysbaert, Jorina & Karen Lahousse
2025. Syntactic position of contrast markers in different registers of French. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue