Cover not available

Article published In: Extending the notion of near-synonymy: Studies in morphological, syntactic and pragmatic equivalence
Edited by Renata Enghels
[Languages in Contrast 18:1] 2018
► pp. 122–144

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Directness vs. indirectness

A contrastive analysis of pragmatic equivalence in Spanish and French request formulations

 | Université catholique de Louvain
Published online: 22 February 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00006.mar
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine the cross-cultural differences between (in)direct Spanish and French request formulations, adopting a pragmatic approach. More specifically, this study focusses on pragmatic equivalences in request formulations in informal and educational contexts, in French and Spanish corpora. In order to do so, a taxonomy was developed, based on the literature and on the analysis of the Spanish and French corpora. The analysis of the data shows that, on the one hand, direct strategies are among the most frequent request formulations in both corpora and, on the other, some formulations are similar in Spanish and in French but that their pragmatic interpretation or their frequency differs.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Hypotheses
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Corpus
    • 4.2Taxonomy
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Quantitative analysis
    • 5.2Qualitative analysis: conventionally direct strategies
    • 5.3Qualitative analysis: (non-)conventionally indirect strategies
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Albelda, M. and Cestero, A. M. 2011. De nuevo, sobre los procedimientos de atenuación lingüística. Español Actual 961: 121–155.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alcón, E., Safont, P. and Martínez-Flor, A. 2005. Towards a Typology of Modifiers for the Speech Act of Rrequesting: a Socio-pragmatic Approach. RAEL: Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada 41: 1–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bataller, R. 2010. Making a Request for a Service in Spanish: Pragmatic Development in the Study Abroad Setting. Foreign Language Annals 43(1): 160–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Role-plays vs. Natural Data: Asking for a Drink at a Cafeteria in Peninsular Spanish. Íkala 18(2): 111–126.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, L. C. and Cummings, M. C. 1996. Natural Speech Act Data versus Written Questionnaire Data: How Data Collection Method Affects Speech Act Performance. In Speech Acts across Languages: Challenges of Communication in a Second Language, S. M. Gass and J. Neu (eds), 65–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. 1987. Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different? Journal of Pragmatics 111: 131–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. and House, J. 1989. Cross-cultural and Situational Variation in Requesting Behavior. In Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. S. Blum-Kulka, J. House and G. Kasper (eds), 123–54. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds). 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levison, S. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carduner, J. 1998. Politeness Strategies of Intermediate to Advanced Learners of Spanish. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CORLEC, Corpus Oral de Referencia de la Lengua Española Contemporánea. 1991–1992. Directed by Prof. Dr. Francisco Marcos Marín. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Available at [URL] [last accessed 12 April 2017].
CIEL-F, Corpus International Écologique de la Langue Française. 2008–2013. Available at [URL] [last accessed 12 April 2017].
Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curcó, C. 1998. ¿No me harías un favorcito? In La pragmática lingüística del español: Recientes desarrollos, H. Haverkate, G. Mulder and C. F. Maldonado (eds), 129–172. Barcelona: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Economidou Kogetsidis, M. 2013. Strategies, Modification and Perspective in Native Speakers’ Requests: a Comparison of WDCT and Naturally Occurring Requests. Journal of Pragmatics 531: 21–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edmonds, O. P. and Hirst, G. 2002. Near-Synonymy and Lexical Choice. Computational Linguistics. 28(2): 105–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enghels, R. and Jansegers, M. 2013. On the Cross-linguistic Equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance Languages: a Contrastive Study in Semantics. Linguistics 51(5): 957–991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell Vidal, M. V. 1996. Los fenómenos de interferencia pragmática. Didáctica del Español como Lengua Extranjera vol III1. 95–109. Madrid: Expolingua.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Social Cognition and Second Language Learning. In Pragmatics Applied to Language Teaching and Learning, R. Gómez-Morón, M. Padilla Cruz, L. Fernández Amaya and M. O. Hernández López (eds), 1–39. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felix-Brasdefer, J. C. 2005. Indirectness and Politeness in Mexican Requests. In Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium, D. Eddington (ed), 66–78. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, B. 1990. Perspectives on Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 219–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gili Gaya, S. 1943. Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Bibliograf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gras, P. 2011. Gramática de Construcciones en Interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. PhD Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grévisse, M. and Goosse, A. 2007. Le bon usage. Grammaire française. Brussels: De Boeck-Duculot. 14th edition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words (SWW). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hassall, T. 2003. Requests by Australian Learners of Indonesian. Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1903–1928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverkate, H. 2006. Aspectos pragmalingüísticos de la interrogación en español con atención especial a las secuencias de preguntas. Cultura, lenguaje y representación 31: 27–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 2001. Les actes de langage dans le discours. Théorie et fonctionnement. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marsily, A. (in press). ¿Es normal que sea un poco difícil de leer la consigna? La atenuación en las peticiones de hablantes no nativos del español. Estudios de Lingüística Universidad de Alicante.
Merritt, M. 1976. On Questions Following Questions (in Service Encounters). LiS 5(3): 315–357.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulder, G. 1993. ¿Por qué no coges el teléfono? Acerca de los actos de habla indirectos. In Aproximaciones pragmalingüísticas al español. H. Haverkate, K. Hengeveld and G. Mulder (eds), 181–207. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogiermann, E. 2009. Politeness and In-directness across Cultures: a Comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian Requests. Journal of Politeness Research 6(4): 189–216.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Direct Off-record Requests? – ‘Hinting’ in Family Interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 861: 31–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinto, D. and Raschio, R. 2007. A Comparative Study of Requests in Heritage Speaker Spanish, L1 Spanish, and L1 English. International Journal of Bilingualism 111: 135–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizarro Pedraza, A. 2016. Pragmemes in the Sociolinguistic Interview: a Case Study on Expanded Polar Answers. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, K. Allan, A. Capone, I. Kecskes and J. L. Mey (eds), 351–374. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2017. Consultas lingüísticas. [URL]. [last accessed 08 April 2017].
Romero, C. 2000. Sur quelques actes de langage polis en français et en espagnol. Les Langues Modernes, Association des professeurs de langues vivantes 94(1): 34–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1969. Speech acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schauer, G. 2009. Interlanguage Pragmatic Development: the Study Abroad Context. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trosborg, A. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics. Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2024. Indirectness. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Isosävi, Johanna
2023. Finnish and French public signs from commercial premises during the Covid-19 pandemic. Pragmatics and Society 14:2 ► pp. 306 ff. DOI logo
De Cock, Barbara, Aurélie Marsily, Andrea Pizarro Pedraza & Marie Rasson
2018. ¿Quién atenúa y cuándo en español?. Spanish in Context 15:2 ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue