Article published In: The gesture–sign interface in language acquisition / L’interface geste–signe dans l’acquisition du langage
Edited by Aliyah Morgenstern and Michèle Guidetti
[Language, Interaction and Acquisition 8:1] 2017
► pp. 89–116
Developing communicative postures
The emergence of shrugging in child communication
Published online: 16 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.8.1.05bea
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.8.1.05bea
Abstract
This article analyses the development of a composite communicative posture, the shrug (which can combine palm-up flips, lifted shoulders and a head tilt), in a video corpus of spontaneous interactions between a typically developing British girl, Ellie, and her mother, filmed at home one hour each month from Ellie’s tenth month to her fourth birthday. The systematic coding of every shrug yields a total of 124 tokens (Ellie: 98; her mother: 26), providing results in terms of forms, functions and input. Ellie’s first shrug components emerge from non-linguistic actions and she acquires them one at a time starting with the hands: these features recall the development of complex signs among deaf children of the same age (Reilly, J., & Anderson, D. (2002). The acquisition of non-manual morphology in ASL. In G. Morgan & B. Woll (Eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition (pp. 159–182). Amsterdam: Benjamins. for ASL). The functions of Ellie’s shrugs gradually diversify from the expression of absence at 1;04 to other epistemic and non-epistemic meanings (affective and dynamic). Adult intervention plays a crucial role as adults recurrently equate Ellie’s physical movements with speech, thereby contributing to the emergence of their communicative functions as gestural emblems (Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The Repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica 1(1), 49–98. ).
Résumé
Dans cet article, nous analysons le développement de la posture composite du shrug (qui peut combiner une supination des paumes ouvertes, un haussement des épaules et un mouvement latéral de la tête), dans un corpus d’interactions spontanées entre une fillette au développement typique, Ellie, et sa maman, filmées à la maison une heure par mois entre les dix mois et les quatre ans d’Ellie. Les 124 occurrences de shrug obtenues après un codage systématique du corpus fournissent des résultats en termes de formes, de fonctions et d’input. Les premiers composants du shrug utilisés par Ellie émergent de ses actions ; elle acquiert ces composants un par un, et en commençant par les mouvements des mains : ces trois aspects rappellent les étapes de l’acquisition de signes composites par des enfants sourds du même âge qu’elle (Reilly, J., & Anderson, D. (2002). The acquisition of non-manual morphology in ASL. In G. Morgan & B. Woll (Eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition (pp. 159–182). Amsterdam: Benjamins. pour l’ASL). Exprimant d’abord l’absence à partir de 1;04, les shrugs d’Ellie développent d’autres fonctions tant épistémiques que non épistémiques (affectives et dynamiques). Le rôle des adultes est prégnant, car en attribuant un équivalent verbal aux mouvements d’Ellie, ils contribuent à l’émergence des fonctions communicatives du shrug comme emblème gestuel (Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The Repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica 1(1), 49–98. ).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The shrug: a composite posture
- 1.2Background: the adult study
- 2.The child study: corpus and method
- 3.Quantitative results
- 3.1Use of forms
- 3.2Functions of shrugs
- 3.3Form-function patterns? Exploratory statistics
- 4.Qualitative analysis: multimodal wholes
- 4.1Palm-up + “done” or “gone”
- 4.2Palm-up + “where…?”
- 4.3Lateral head tilt + “I don’t know” or “I can’t remember”
- 4.4After 3;03: more complex multimodal utterances
- 5.The role of the input
- 5.1The input as model
- 5.2Adult speech about the child’s gestures
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (71)
Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique de Lund 501. Lund: Lund University Press.
Beaupoil-Hourdel, P. (2015). Multimodal acquisition and expression of negation. Unpublished thesis manuscript. Sorbonne Nouvelle: Paris.
Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., Morgenstern, A., & Boutet, D. (2015). A child’s multimodal negations from 1 to 4: The interplay between modalities. In P. Larrivée & C. Lee (Eds.), Negation and polarity: Cognitive and experimental perspectives (pp. 95–123). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Bello, A., Caselli, M. -C., Pettenati, P., & Stefanini, S. (2010). PinG parole in Gioco : Una prova di comprensione e produzione lessicale per la prima infanzia. Firenze: Giunti OS.
Blondel, M., Boutet, D., Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., & Morgenstern, A. (2017). La négation chez les enfants signeurs et non signeurs : Des patrons gestuels communs. In M. Guidetti & A. Morgenstern (Eds.), Language Interaction and Acquisition 8(1), 143–182.
Boutet, D. (2008). Une morphologie de la gestualité : Structuration articulaire. Cahiers de Linguistique Analogique 51, 81–115.
Capirci, O., Iverson, J., Pizzuto, E., & Volterra, V. (1996). Gestures and words during the transition to two-word speech. Journal of Child Language 23(3), 645–673.
Channon, R., & van der Hulst, H. (Eds.). (2011). Formational units in Sign Languages. Göttingen: de Gruyter.
Cienki, A. (2005). Image schemas and gesture. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 421–442). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Clark, E. V. (1978). From gesture to word: On the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. In J. Seymour Bruner & A. Garton (Eds.), Human growth and development (pp. 85–120). Wolfson College Lectures 1976. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Darwin, C. (1872). The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals. (Accessed August 2015) [URL]
Debras, C. (2013). Multimodal Stance-taking. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Sorbonne Nouvelle University, Paris.
(to appear). The shrug: forms and meanings of a compound enactment. Gesture 171.
(2001). Quelques raisons de distinguer locuteurs et énonciateurs. Polyphonie – linguistique et littéraire 31, 19–41.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The Repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica 1(1), 49–98.
Englebretson, R. (2007). Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 2–25). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Filhol, M., Hadjadj, M. N., & Choisier, A. (2014). Non-manual features: The right to indifference. Proceedings of Language resource and evaluation conference (LREC), 6th workshop on the representation and processing of Sign Language: Beyond the manual channel (pp. 49–54). Reykjavik.
Gaudy-Campbell, I. (2000). Le question-tag descendant : Marque de questionnement ou d’égocentrage? Anglophonia 81, 168–180.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Goodrich, W., Sauer, E., & Iverson, J. (2007). Young children use their hands to tell their mothers what to say. Developmental Science 10(6), 778–785.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1), 1–54.
Holzrichter, A. S., & Meier, R. P. (2000). Child-directed signing in American Sign Language. In C. Chamberlain, J. P. Morford, & R. I. Mayberry (Eds.), Language acquisition by eye: Early language acquisition (pp. 25–40). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Iverson, J. M. (2010). Developing language in a developing body: The relationship between motor development and language development. Journal of Child Language 371, 229–261.
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science 161, 367–371.
Iverson, J., Capirci, O., Volterra, V., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Learning to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication of Italian vs. American children. First Language 281, 164–181.
Kendon, A. (2002). Some uses of the head shake. Gesture 2(2), 147–182.
Lakshmi, J. Gogate, L. E. Bahrick, & Watson, J. D. (2000). A Study of multimodal motherese: The role of temporal synchrony between verbal labels and gestures. Child Development 71(4), 878–894.
Lê, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F. (2008). FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 25(1), 1–18.
LeBaron, C. & Streeck, J. (2000). Gesture, knowledge and the world. In D. McNeill (ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marconi, D. & Bertinetto, P. M. (1984). Analisi di ma
. (Parte prima : Semantica e pragmatica). Lingua e stile 19(2), 223–258.
Maury-Rouan, C. (2011). ‘Voices’ and bodies: Investigating nonverbal parameters of the participation framework. In G. Stam & M. Ishino (Eds.), Integrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp. 309–320). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
McNeill, D. (2014). Gesture-speech unity: Phylogenesis, ontogenesis, and microgenesis. Language, Interaction, Acquisition 5(2), 137–184.
McWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analysing talk (3rd ed., Vol. 21). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Meier, R. P., Mauk, C. E., Cheek, A., & Moreland, C. J. (2008). The form of children's early signs: Iconic or motoric determinants? Language Learning and Development 4(1), 63–98.
Morgan, G., Barrett-Jones, S., & Stoneham, H. (2007). The first signs of language: Phonological development in British Sign Language. Applied Psycholinguistics 281, 3–22.
Morgenstern, A. (2014). Children’s multimodal language development. In C. Fäcke (Ed.) Manual of language acquisition (pp. 123–142). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
Morgenstern, A., & Beaupoil, P. (2015). Multimodal approaches to language acquisition through the lens of negation. Vestnik of Moscow State University. Linguistics and literary studies 6 (717), 435–451. Special issue on discourse as social practice.
Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family? In C. Müller & R. Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, Proceedings of the Berlin conference, April 1998 (pp. 233–256). Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.
Nelson, K. (1998). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perdoncin, A., & Mercklé, P. (2014). Représenter graphiquement les résultats d’une analyse factorielle avec R. [URL]
Pettenati, P., Stefanini, S., & Volterra, V. (2010). Motoric characteristics of representational gestures produced by young children in a naming task. Journal of Child Language 371, 887–911.
Reilly, J., & Anderson, D. (2002). The acquisition of non-manual morphology in ASL. In G. Morgan & B. Woll (Eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition (pp. 159–182). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Rossari, C. (2014). How does a concessive value emerge? In C. Ghezzi & P. Molinelli (Eds.), Pragmatic markers from Latin to Romance languages: Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics (pp. 237–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sekali, M. (2012). The emergence of complex sentences in a French child’s language from 0;10 to 4;01: Causal adverbial clauses and the concertina effect. Journal of French Language Studies 22(1), 115–141.
Shaw, E. (2013). Gesture in multiparty interaction: A study of embodied discourse in spoken English and American Sign Language. Unpublished thesis manuscript, Georgetown University, Washington DC.
Stefanini, S., Caselli, M. -C., & Volterra, V. (2007). Spoken and gestural production in a naming task by young children with Down Syndrome. Brain and Language 101(3), 208–221.
Stefanini, S., Bello, A., Caselli, M. -C., Iverson, J. M., & Volterra, V. (2009). Cospeech gestures in a naming task: Developmental data. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(2), 168–189.
Streeck, J. (1994). 'Speech-handling': The metaphorical representation of speech in gestures. A cross-cultural study. University of Texas, Austin: Unpublished manuscript.
(2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Sutton-Spence, R., & Woll, B. (1999). The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tennant, R., & Gluszak Brown, M. (1998). The American Sign Language handshape dictionary. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(5), 675–691.
Tottie, G., & Hoffmann, S. (2006). Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4), 283–311.
Valli, C., & Lucas, C. (2000). Linguistics of American Sign Language: An introduction (3rd Ed.). Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
Wilcox, S. (2004). Gesture and language. Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture 4(1), 43–73.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Harrison, Simon
Yamaguchi, Naomi, Tiphanie Bertin & Pauline Beaupoil-Hourdel
2024. Conversations in early childhood education and care centres. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 15:1 ► pp. 158 ff.
Beaupoil-Hourdel, Pauline & Aliyah Morgenstern
Boutet, Dominique, Marion Blondel, Pauline Beaupoil-Hourdel & Aliyah Morgenstern
Harrison, Simon & Silva H. Ladewig
2021. Recurrent gestures throughout bodies, languages, and cultural practices. Gesture 20:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Harrison, Simon, Silva H. Ladewig & Jana Bressem
Ladewig, Silva H. & Lena Hotze
Ladewig, Silva H. & Lena Hotze
Marrese, Olivia H., Chase Wesley Raymond, Barbara A. Fox, Cecilia E. Ford & Megan Pielke
Morgenstern, Aliyah, Stéphanie Caët, Camille Debras, Pauline Beaupoil-Hourdel & Marine Le Mené
2021. Children’s socialization to multi-party interactive practices. In Language and Social Interaction at Home and School [Dialogue Studies, 32], ► pp. 45 ff.
Clift, Rebecca
Cooperrider, Kensy, Natasha Abner & Susan Goldin-Meadow
Blondel, Marion, Dominique Boutet, Pauline Beaupoil-Hourdel & Aliyah Morgenstern
2017. La négation chez les enfants signeurs et non signeurs. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 8:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
