Cover not available

Article published In: Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 7:2 (2016) ► pp.212–237

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Prosody- vs. segment-based teaching

Impact on the perceptual skills of French learners of English

 | Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale
Published online: 21 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.7.2.03cap
English, an international language, is widely taught and learnt as a foreign language in France. However, French learners face pronunciation difficulties, as the two languages differ both on the segmental level (i.e. individual sounds) and on the suprasegmental, prosodic level (i.e. stress, rhythm, intonation). It has been argued that focus on the prosodic features of the target language (L2) would improve learners’ oral skills. Nevertheless, very few studies have brought evidence of the greater role of prosody in the acquisition of a second or foreign language. The current study seeks to address this gap by directly comparing prosody-centred and segment-centred teaching to determine whether one approach is more effective than the other in the improvement of L2 oral perception skills. The study shows that both teaching approaches enabled French EFL learners to improve their perception skills; however, neither method proved to have a stronger impact, suggesting that both segmental and suprasegmental aspects should both be addressed in L2 teaching.
References (37)
Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akita, M. (2005). The effectiveness of a prosody-oriented approach in L2 perception and pronunciation training. Gakujyutsu Kenkyuu, 531, 1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alazard, C., Astésano, C., Billières, M., & Espesser, R. (2011). Rôle de la prosodie dans la structuration du discours—Proposition d'une méthodologie d'enseignement de l'oral vers l'écrit en français langue étrangère. In H.-Y. Yoo & E. Delais-Roussarie (Eds.), Actes d'IDP 2009 (pp. 49–61). Paris.
Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgements of non-native pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42(4), 529–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, A. (1988). Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly 22(4), 593–606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgess, J., & Spencer, S. (2000). Phonology and pronunciation in integrated language teaching and teacher education. System, 281, 191–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (2008). Gimson's pronunciation of English (7th ed.). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T.M., & Munro, M.J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T.M., Munro, M.J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T.M., & Rossiter, M.J. (2003). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2-accented speech. Applied Language Learning, 131, 1–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, S. (1992). Pronunciation syllabus design: A question of focus. In P. Avery & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Teaching American English pronunciation (pp. 173–183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J.E. (1987). The production of new and similar phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 151, 47–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, H. (2001). Teaching pronunciation – A handbook for teachers and trainers. Sydney: TAFE Access Division.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frodden, C., & McNulty, M. (1996). A new look at suprasegmentals. Íkala, 1(1-2), 101–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, J.B. (1984). Clear speech: Pronunciation and listening comprehension in American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, M. (2001). Place et rôle de l'intonation dans l'apprentissage de l'anglais. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Université Paris XII – Val de Marne, France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahn, L.D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herry-Bénit, N. (2011). Didactique de la phonétique anglaise. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirst, D., Di Cristo, A., & Espesser, R. (2000). Levels of representation and levels of analysis for the description of intonation systems. In M. Horne (Ed.), Prosody: Theory and experiment (pp. 51–87). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horgues, C. (2010). Prosodie de l'accent français en anglais et perception par des auditeurs anglophones. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Université Paris-Diderot Paris 7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jilka, M. (2000). The contribution of intonation to the perception of foreign accent. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamiyama, T., & Shinohara, S. (2010). Role of prosody in segmental perception in L2. Sophia University Working Papers in Phonetics 20101, 10–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjellin, O. (1999). Accent addition: Prosody and perception facilitate second language acquisition. In O. Fujimura, B.D. Joseph, & B. Palek (Eds.), Proceedings of LP'98 (Linguistics and Phonetics Conference) at Ohio State University 2 (373–398). Prague: The Karolinum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepage, A., & Busa, M.G. (2014). Intelligibility of English L2: The effects of incorrect word stress placement and incorrect vowel reduction in the speech of French and Italian learners of English. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 51, 387–400.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Missaglia, F. (1999). Contrastive prosody in SLA – An empirical study with adult Italian learners of German. Proceedings of the 14 th Congress of Phonetic Sciences , 11, 551–554.
Moyer, A. (2007). Empirical considerations on the age factor in L2 phonology. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 109–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pike, K. (1945). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Querleu, D., Renard, X., Versyp, F., Paris-Delrue, L., & Crèpin, G. (1988). Fetal hearing. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproduction Biology, 291, 191–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reed, M. (2012). Pronunciation tools for fostering intelligibility and communication success. ATESOL ACT Professional Development Workshop , Canberra, Australia.
Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology – A practical course (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tajima, K., Port, R., & Dalby, J. (1997). Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. Journal of Phonetics, 251, 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomson, R.I., & Derwing, T.M. (2014). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, Advanced online access. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ueno, N. (1998). Teaching English pronunciation to Japanese English majors: A comparison of a suprasegmental-oriented and a segmental-oriented teaching approach. JACET Bulletin 291, 207–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaissière, J. (2002). Cross-linguistic prosodic transcription: French versus English. In N.B. Volskaya, N.D. Svetozarova, & P.A. Skrelin (Eds.), Problems and methods in experimental phonetics. In honour of the 70 th anniversary of Prof. L.V. Bondarko (pp. 147–164). St Petersburg: St Petersburg State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallduví, E. (1991). The informational component. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yates, K. (2003). Teaching linguistic mimicry to improve second language pronunciation. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Rouaud, Julie, Nathalie Huet & Anne Przewozny
2022. Assessing Spoken English Performance and Self-Efficacy Beliefs in the Classroom: Some Considerations on the Value of an Interdisciplinary Embodied Methodology for French Learners of English. Recherches anglaises et nord-américaines :55 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Santiago, Fabián
2022. L’accentuation contribue-t-elle à l’acquisition du contraste arrondi vs non-arrondi des voyelles orales en français langue étrangère ?. Éla. Études de linguistique appliquée N° 204:4 ► pp. 467 ff. DOI logo
McAndrews, Mark
2019. Short periods of instruction improve learners’ phonological categories for L2 suprasegmental features. System 82 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue