Cover not available

Article published In: Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 7:2 (2016) ► pp.180–211

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Explanatory content and visibility effects on the young child’s verbal and gestural behavior in free dialogues

 | Laboratoire d'Excellence ASLAN, Lyon
 | ICAR, CNRS / University of Lyon / ENS de Lyon
Published online: 21 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.7.2.02maz
In this study we analyzed the verbal and gestural behavior of 6-year-old French children during free dialogue explanation. We expected that children would alter their gestures according to content explained and interlocutor visibility. Thirty children explained two games to a peer: fifteen could not see their interlocutor whereas fifteen could. Results showed that the mean number of clauses per explanation of a child speaker interacting with a child addressee did not significantly change according to content explained or the visibility of the addressee. However, the mean number of gestures per clause is higher for a child speaker interacting with a child addressee both when explaining the spatial game and when face-to-face. Finally, children explaining how to play a spatial game produced more representational gestures and made more interactive gestures when the addressee was visible. These results are discussed in relation to previous studies on children’s language production and acquisition.
References (72)
Aisenman, R., & Berman, R. (2000). Rethinking lexical analysis. Developing Literacy across Genres, Modalities, and Languages, 31, 187–196.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, M.W., & Don, L.S. (2001). Children’s gesture are meant to be seen. Gesture, 1(2), 113–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, M.W., Kita, S., & Young, A.J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 593–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, M.W., Heath, D.C., & Myers, H.J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(6), 169–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alamillo, R.A., Colletta, J.-M., & Guidetti, M. (2013). Gesture and language in narratives and explanations: The effects of age and communicative activity on late multimodal discourse development. Journal of Child Language, 40(3), 511–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing. The social organisation of accounts. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Argerich, N., & Tolchinsky, L. (2000). On a definition of lexical items in written and spoken texts. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages, 31, 197–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, J.B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D.A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15(4), 469–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, J.B., Gerwing, J., Sutton, C., & Prevost D. (2008). Gesturing on the telephone: independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language 581, 495–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beattie, G. & Aboudan, R. (1994). Gestures, pauses and speech: An experimental Investigation of the effects of changing social context on their precise temporal relationships. Semiotica, 991, 239–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R.A. (2000). Thematic perspectives on how children talk about interpersonal conflict. Developing Literacy across Genres, Modalities, and Languages, 31, 65–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). The psycholinguistics of text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35(4), 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R.A., & Katzenberger, I. (2004). Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 57–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R.A., & Slobin, D.I. (1987). Five ways of learning to talk about events: A crosslinguistic study of children’s narratives (Berkeley Cognitive Science Report No. 46). Berkeley CA: Institute of Cognitive Studies, University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, A.A. (1977). The communications functions of hand illustrators. Journal of Communication, 27(4), 54–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, A.A., & Harrison, R.P. (1973). Intentionality in the use of hand illustrators in face-to-face communication situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(2), 276–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coirier, P., Gaonac’h, D., & Passerault, J.-M. (1996). Psycholinguistique textuelle. Paris: Armand Colin Édition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colletta, J.-M. (2004). Le développement de la parole chez l’enfant âgé de 6 et 11 ans. Corps, langage et cognition. Hayen, Belgique: Mardaga.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colletta, J.-M., Lachnitt, C., & Simon, J.-P. (2005). Les conduites explicatives orales à l’école maternelle. In J.-F. Halté & M. Rispail (Eds.), L’oral dans la classe: Compétences, enseignement, activités (pp. 137–151). Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colletta, J.-M., & Pellenq, C. (2005). Les explications entre 3 et 11 ans: Fenêtre sur le développement discursif et multimodal de la parole. Fifth IAIMTE Conference, Albi, 11-13 mai.
Colletta, J.-M. & Pellenq, C. (2009). The development of multimodal explanations in French children. In M.A. Nippold & C.M. Scott (Eds.), Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults development and disorders (pp. 63–100). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colletta, J.-M., Capirci, O., Cristilli, C., Goldin-Meadow, S., Guidetti, M., & Levine, S. (2011). Multimodal data transcription and annotation with ELAN (Coding manual). ANR Multimodality research. Retrived from [URL]
Cosnier, J. (1996). Les gestes du dialogue, la communication verbale. Psychologie de la Motivation, 211, 129–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Les gestes du dialogue. In P. Cabin & J.-F. Dortier (Eds.), La communication, état des savoirs (pp. 119–128). Auxerre: Editions Sciences Humaines.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Kent, G. (1996). Visual signals and communication abilities of children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(3), 595–608. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., & Casey, S. (2001). Gesture, thought and spatial language. Gesture, 1(1), 35–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fantazi, D. (2010). La gestualité cohésive dans les récits d’enfants âgés de 9 à 11 ans. Lidil, 421, 97–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Favart, M., & Passerault, J.-M. (1996). Functionnality of cohesion devices in the management of local and global coherence: two studies in children’s written production of narratives. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Berg, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodologies in writing (pp. 349–365). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gineste, M.-D., & Le Ny, J.-F. (2002). Psychologie cognitive du langage. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: The Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graziano, M. (2010). Le développement des gestes pragmatiques et leur relation avec le développement de la compétence textuelle chez l’enfant âgés de 4 à 10 ans. Lidil, 421, 113–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grize, J.-B. (1990). Logique et langage. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guidetti, M., Fibigerova, K., & Colletta, J.-M. (2014). Gestures and multimodal development. Some keys issues for language acquisition. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gulberg (Eds.), From Gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon (pp. 351–370). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hempel, C.G. & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 567–579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., Kail, M., & Roland, F. (1995). L’organisation référentielle dans les récits d’enfants en fonction des contraintes contextuelles. Enfance, 21, 215–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jisa, H. (2004). Growing into academic French. In R.A. Berman (Ed.), Later language development: Typological and psycholinguistic perspectives (Trends in Language Acquisition Research 3), (pp. 135–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson, V. (1999). Word frequencies in speech and Writing: A study of expository discourse. Genre and Modality in Developing Discourse Abilities, 11, 182–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katzenberger, I. (2004). The development of clause packaging in spoken and written texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 361, 1921–1948. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1987). On gesture: Its complementary relationship with speech. In A.W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication (pp. 65–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality. In D. McNeill (Eds.), Language and gesture: Window into thought and action (pp. 47–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeil (Eds.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S., Özyürek, A., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2007). Relations between syntactic encoding and co-speech gestures: Implications for a model of speech and gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(8), 1212–1236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krauss, R.M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 71, 54–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krauss, R.M., Dushay, R.A., Chen, Y., & Rausher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gestures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(6), 533–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Ny, J.-F. (1979). La sémantique psychologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lickiss, K.P., & Wellens, A.R. (1978). Effects of visual accessibility and hand restraint on fluency of gesticulator and effectiveness of message. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 461, 925–926. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lund, K. (2003). Analyse de l’activité explicative en interaction: Étude de dialogues d’enseignants de physique en formation interprétant les interactions entre élèves. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Lyon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazur-Palandre, A. (2009). Les connexions syntaxiques: Considérations contextuelles et développementales. In M. Sandré (Ed.), Analyses du discours et contextes: Quelles relations? (pp. 125–136). Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Formes et positions syntaxiques du syntagme nominal: Une étude développementale du français scolaire en ZEP. Sciences Croisées, 61(Numéro thématique), 75–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Le flux de l’information: Aspects syntaxiques et discursifs. Une étude fonctionnaliste et développementale. Berlin: Éditions universitaires européennes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazur-Palandre, A., & Jisa, H. (2012). La lexicalité des productions orales et écrites: Une étude développementale. Enfance, 41, 359–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D., & Duncan, S.D. (2000). Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özcaliskan, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). When mothers do not lead their children by the hand. In A. Brugos, L. Micciulla, & C. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 424–435). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rabahi, T., Fargier, P., Rifai-Sarraj, A., Clouzeau, C. & Massarelli, R. (2012). Motor performance may be improved by kinesthetic imagery, specific action verb production, and mental calculation. NeuroReport, 23(2), 78–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (2006). Semantic development in textual contexts during the school years: Noun scale analyses. Journal of Child Language, 33(4), 791–821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Berman, R.A. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity across adolescence: A text-embedded analysis. First Language, 30(1), 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rimé, B. (1982). The elimination of visible behavior from social interactions: Effects on verbal, non verbal ans interpersonal variables. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12(2), 113–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneuwly, B. (1988). Le langage écrit chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traxler, M., & Gernsbacher, M.A. (1995). Improving coherence in written communication. In M.A. Gernsbacher & T. Givón (Eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text (pp. 215–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veneziano, E., & Hudelot, C. (2002). Développement des compétences pragmatiques et théories de l’esprit chez l’enfant: Le cas de l’explication. In J. Bernicot, A. Trognon, M. Guidetti, & M. Musiol (Eds.), Pragmatique et psychologie (pp. 215–236). Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veneziano, E., & Sinclair, H. (1995). Functional changes in early child language: The appearance of references to the past and of explanations. Journal of Child Language, 22(3), 557–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warren, A.R. & Tate, C.S. (1992). Egocentrism in children’s telephone conversations. In R.M. Diaz & L.E. Berk (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 245–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Mazur Palandre, Audrey, Jean-Marc Colletta & Kristine Lund
2021. Alors, là, je vais vous expliquer comment on joue ! Explication procédurale finalisée dans une perspective développementale. Langages N° 221:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Mazur-Palandre, Audrey, Jean-Marc Colletta & Kristine Lund
2019. Chapitre 5. Gestes, paroles et prise en compte des contraintes interactionnelles dans l’explication enfantine à 6 ans. In Multimodalité du langage dans les interactions et l’acquisition, ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Mazur-Palandre, Audrey & Kristine Lund
2019. Chapitre 4. Explication « en comment » d’enfants de 6 ans : les relations temporelles et sémantiques entre les unités linguistiques et gestuelles. In Multimodalité du langage dans les interactions et l’acquisition, ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue