Article published In: Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 6:2 (2015) ► pp.202–236
Interrelationships between Time and Space in English and French discourse
Implications for second language acquisition
Published online: 21 January 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.6.2.02dem
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.6.2.02dem
This paper explores the expression of temporal boundaries in narrative discourse drawing on cartoon-elicited productions which narrate caused and/or voluntary motion events involving four types of paths. We hypothesise that the way speakers express temporal boundaries depends on the “framing” of their first language (Talmy 2000). We therefore examine productions by speakers of L1 French (V-framed language), L1 English (S-framed) and English learners of L2 French at three levels of proficiency. Productions may include a Setting section and a Main event. Findings show that each speaker group has its own mode of expressing temporal and spatial boundaries. The choice in L1 French depends on Path type, but not in L1 English. English learners of L2 French pattern more like L1 French speakers for verbal morphology, but their expression of space is nearly similar to their L1 English. The discussion highlights implications of this linguistic framing type for L2 acquisition.
Keywords: SLA, Linguistics typology, psycholinguistics, French., verbal morphology, Space, English, Time
References (64)
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall, M. Meacham & R. Shapiro (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1–14). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics.
Athanasopoulos, P. (2006). Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9(1), 89–96.
. (2007) Interaction between grammatical categories and cognition in bilinguals: The role of proficiency, cultural immersion, and language of instruction. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(5), 689–699.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
Beavers, J. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46(2), 331–377.
Cadierno, T. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (eds.), A handbook of cognitive linguistics and SLA (378–406). London: Routledge.
Cadierno, T. & Ruiz, L. (2006). Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 41, 183–316.
Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. (1997). Relation entre grammaticalisation et conceptualisation et implications sur l’acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 91, 83–115. [URL].
Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 1061, 579–593.
Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O. & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Space and time in the child’s mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science 341, 387–405.
Chalozin-Dovrat, L. (2015). Les rapports entre le temps et l’espace dans les théories linguistiques. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Paris IV & Tel Aviv University.
Clark, H.H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In T.E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the acquisition of language (26–64). New York: Academic Press.
Croft, W., Barddal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V. & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In H. Boas (ed.), Contrastive construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Demagny, A.-C. (2012). Paths in L2 Acquisition: The expression of temporality in spatially oriented narratives. In M. Watorek, S. Benazzo & M. Hickmann (eds.), Comparative perspectives on language acquisition – A tribute to Clive Perdue (482–501). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Demagny, A.C. (2013). L’expression du temps et de l’espace en français et en anglais : perspectives typologiques sur l’acquisition des langues par l’adulte. Langue Française 179, 109–127.
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M., Eshuis, H., Martinez, L. & Listhaug, K. (2012). No evidence of L1 Path Encoding Strategies in the L2 in advanced Bulgarian speakers of Norwegian. Spatial Cognition and Computation. Special Issue: First and Second Language Acquisition of Spatial Language
12(4), 275–404.
Fortis, J.-M. (2010). Space in language: The typology of motion events. Talmy’s typology. Leipzig summer school on linguistic typology (August 14-28). [Online] [URL]
Gallagher, S. & Meltzoff, A.N. (1996). The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philosophical Psychology 9(2), 211–233.
Habel, C. & Eschenbach, C. (1997). Abstract structures in spatial cognition. In C. Freksa, M. Jantzen & R. Valk (eds.), Foundations of computer science - potential - theory - cognition (369–378). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Harr, A.-K. (2012). Language-specific factors in first language acquisition. The expression of motion events in French and German. Studies on language acquisition 48. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Haspelmath, M. (1997). From space to time. Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. Lincom studies in theoretical linguistics 3. München-Newcastle: Lincom Europa.
Hendriks, H. (1998). Comment il monte le chat ? En grimpant ! L’acquisition de l’empaquetage spatial en chinois, français et allemand L1 et L2. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 111, 147–190.
Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M. & Demagny, A.-C. (2008). How adult English learners of French express caused motion: A comparison with English and French natives. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 271, 15–41.
Hendriks, H. & Hickmann, M. (2015). Finding one’s path into another language: On the expression of boundary crossing by English learners’s of French. The Modern Language Journal. Supplement: The Language and Thought of Motion in Second Language Speakers 99(S1), 14–31.
Hickmann, M. & Hendriks, H. (2010). Typological constraints on the acquisition of spatial language in French and English. Cognitive Linguistics 21(2), 189–215.
. (in press). Time talk in narrative discourse: Evidence from child and adult language acquisition. In J. Guéron (ed.), Sentence and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kamp, H. (1981). Evénements, représentations discursives et référence temporelle. Langages 641, 34–64.
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press; Reprinted in Journal of Narrative and Life History (1997) 7(1–4), 1-38.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition, (202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lambert, M., Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. (2003). La subordination dans les récits d’apprenants avances francophones et germanophones de l’anglais. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 191, 41–69 [URL].
. (2008). Acquisition en L2 des principes d’organisation de récits spécifiques aux langues. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 261, 11–29.
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press
. (1991). Foundations of cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Leclercq, P. (2007). L’influence de la L1 dans l’organisation des discours chez les apprenants avancés / quasi-bilingues : le cas de l’aspect « en déroulement » en français et en anglais. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Paris 8.
Leclercq, P. & Lenart, E. (2015). Rôle de la subordination pour construire les chaînes événementielles du récit chez des apprenants avancés du français L2. In P. Trévisiol & M. Kaheraoui (eds.), Relatives et autres subordonnées - regards croisés en linguistique, acquisition et didactique (79–102). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes (PUR).
Maouene, J., Hidaka, S. & Smith, B.L. (2008). Body parts and early-learned verbs. Cognitive Science 32(7), 1200–1216.
Malt, B.C. & Sloman, S.A. (2003). Linguistic diversity and object naming by non-native speakers of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 61, 47–67.
Matsumoto, Y. (2003). Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba (ed.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–418). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Navarro, S. & Nicoladis, E. (2005). Describing motion events in adult L2 Spanish narratives. In D. Eddington (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (102–107). Somerville, MA.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Nikitina, T. (2008). Pragmatic factors and variation in the expression of spatial goals: the case of into and in
. In A. Ashbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke & R. Nouwenn (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P (175–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J. & Grand, S. (2007). How the body shapes the way we think: a new view of intelligence. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Pourcel, S. & Kopecka, A. (2005). Motion expression in French: Typological diversity. Durham and Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 111, 139–153.
Schultze-Berndt, E. (2000). Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung. A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. PhD. Thesis. University of Nijmegen.
Slobin, D.I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J.J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog. In D. Diskin Ravid & H.B.-Z. Shyldkrot (eds.), Relating narrative events in translation: Typological and contextual perspectives: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (219–257). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Smith, C. (1991 [1997]). The parameter of aspect. (2nd edition, 1997). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
. (2004). The domain of tense. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time (597–620). Cambridge, Mass: MIT.
Schmiedtová, B. (2011). Do L2 speakers think in the L1 when speaking in the L2? Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8(2), 138–179.
Stutterheim, C. von & Carroll, M. (2006). The impact of grammatical temporal categories on ultimate attainment in L2 learning. In H. Byrnes, H.D. Weger-Guntharp & K. Sprang (eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities (40–53). Georgetown: GUP.
Stutterheim, C. von, Carroll, M. & Klein, W. (2009). New perspectives in analyzing aspectual distinctions across languages. In W. Klein & P. Li (eds.), The expression of time (195–216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stutterheim, C. von & Klein, W. (1987). A concept-oriented approach to second language studies. In C.W. Pfaff (ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (191–205). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
Talmy, L. (2000 [2003]). Toward a cognitive semantics. Typology and process in concept structuring, vol. 1 & 21. 2nd edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
. (2006). The relation of grammar to cognition. In D. Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (69–108). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
. (2013). Main verb properties and equipollent framing. PDF online: [URL].
Tenbrink, T. (2007). Space, time, and the use of language – An investigation of relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Watorek, M. (2004). Construction du discours par des apprenants de langues, enfants et adultes. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 201, 129–171.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Leclercq, Pascale
2025. L2-French acquisition of discursive competence. In Approaches and Methods in French Second Language Acquisition Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 9], ► pp. 174 ff.
Soroli, Efstathia
Arslangul, Arnaud, Henriëtte Hendriks, Maya Hickmann & Annie-Claude Demagny
2018. L’expression des procès spatiaux causatifs chez les apprenants francophones du chinois. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 9:2 ► pp. 256 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
