Cover not available

Article published In: Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 6:2 (2015) ► pp.181–201

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Complexity at the phrasal level in spoken L1 and very advanced L2 French

 | Stockholm University
Published online: 21 January 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.6.2.01bar
This article examines linguistic complexity in the noun phrase in spoken L1 and L2 French. Research on linguistic complexity in L2 has often concentrated on syntactic complexity, subordination in particular. In this study, we focus on syntactic complexity at the phrasal level, i.e. in the noun phrase, following the assumption put forward by Norris and Ortega (2009: 564) that internal NP complexity provides an important measure of very advanced learners. The present study examines pre- and post-modification in the noun phrase in the oral production of very advanced non-native speakers (NNS) and native speakers (NS) elicited through an on-line retelling of a clip from Modern Times. The results confirm our main hypothesis, that there are differences between NS and NNS: NS use more complex NPs, NPs with a higher mean number of words and more NPs with multiple modifiers.
References (38)
Ågren, M., Granfeldt, J. & Schlyter, S. (2012). The growth of complexity and accuracy in L2 French. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency (95–119). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartning, I. (1996). Éléments pour une typologie des SN complexes en de en français. In L. Kupferman (ed.), La préposition de . Langue française 1091, 29–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Towards a typology of French NP de NP structures or how much possession is there in complex noun phrases with de in French? In I. Baron, M. Herslund & F. Sorensen (eds.), Dimensions of possession (147–167). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartning, I. & Forsgren, M. (2010). Les adjectifs relationnels revisités. In J. Goes & E. Moline (eds.), L’adjectif hors de sa catégorie (57–77). Artois: Artois Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartning, I. & Hammarberg, B. (2007). The functions of a high-frequency collocation in native and learner discourse: The case of French c’est and Swedish det är . IRAL 451, 1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartning, I. & Kirchmeyer, N. (2003). Le développement de la compétence textuelle à travers les stades acquisitionnels en français L2. AILE 191, 9–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartning, I. & Schlyter, S. (2004). Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Language Studies 141, 301–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bulté, B. & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (21–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 261, 42–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erman, B. & Lewis, M. (subm.). Complexity in the noun phrase in native and very advanced non-native speech. Stockholm University.
Forsberg Lundell, F. & Bartning, I. (2015). Successful profiles in high-level L2 French – ‘c’est un choix de vie’. In F. Forsberg Lundell & I. Bartning (eds.), Cultural migrants and optimal language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F., Bartning, I., Engel, H., Gudmundson, A., Hancock, V. & Lindqvist, C. (2014). Beyond advanced stages in high-level L2 French. Journal of French Language Studies 241, 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flaux, N. & van de Velde, D. (2000). Les noms en français: Esquisse de classement. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granfeldt, J. (2003). L’acquisition des catégories fonctionnelles. Étude comparative du développement du DP français chez des enfants et des apprenants adultes. Lund: Lunds universitet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hancock, V. & Kirchmeyer, N. (2005). Discourse structuring in advanced L2 French: The relative clause. In J.M. Dewaele (ed.), Focus on French (17–35). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housen, A. & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition, Applied Linguistics 301, 461–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K, Bartning, I. & Fant, L. (eds.) (2014). Avancerad Andraspråksanvändning. Slutrapport från ett forskningsprogram. RJ:s skriftserie 2. Göteborg/Stockholm: Makadam Förlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleiber, G., Laca, B. & Tasmowski, L. (eds.) (2001). Typologie des groupes nominaux. Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kufpermann, L. (ed) (1996). La préposition de . Langue française 1091.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lahmann, C. 2015. Beyond barriers: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in long-term L2 speakers’ speech. PhD thesis. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcusson, M. (2013). La construction Nom+de+Nom en français contemporain: Essai d’une approche cognitive. PhD thesis. Tromsö University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miestamo, M. (2008). Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (23–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noailly, M. (1990). Le substantif épithète. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). L’adjectif en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA. The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4), 555–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics 30(4), 590–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research 31(1): 117–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pedersen, J., Spang-Hanssen, E. & Vikner, C. (1982). Fransk universitetsgrammatik. Stockholm: Esselte studium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D. & Berman, R. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity at school age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language 301, 3–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riegel, M., Pellat, J-Chr. & Rioul, R. (1994/2011). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouget, C. (2000). Distribution et sémantique des constructions Nom de Nom. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonkyn, A. (2012). Measuring and perceiving changes in oral complexity, accuracy and fluency. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (221–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Daele, S., Housen A. & Pierrard, M. (2007). Fluency, accuracy and complexity in the manifestation and the development of two second languages. In S. van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard & I. Vedder (eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language learning and teaching (301–316). Wetteren: Universa Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing. Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue