Article published In: The Morphological Expression of Temporality on the Verb in French as a Second Language / L’expression morphologique de la temporalité sur le verbe en français langue seconde
Edited by Pascale Leclercq and Martin Howard
[Language, Interaction and Acquisition 6:1] 2015
► pp. 74–106
Acquisition of the imparfait in L2 French in adults and children: The same or different?
A comparative case study of Swedish adults and children in an immersion setting
Published online: 28 August 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.6.1.03kih
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.6.1.03kih
In this study, we provide a comparison of adult and child L2 acquisition in relation to their use of the imparfait form in L2 French. Previous research on this form shows that it is an area of considerable difficulty, being lexically and functionally restricted in use even in advanced stages of acquisition. In the study presented here, we compare our child and adult learners in an immersion setting, where the adult learners were studying at a French university, while the children were attending a French immersion school. Their use of the imparfait is explored through a longitudinal lens, where we look in particular at its use to mark different aspectual values, as well as its lexical use with different verbs. The findings indicate that, while both groups benefit from the immersion context, the children’s development seems to be more rapid and more stable: once they start using the imparfait productively, they use it for a greater range of its aspectual values and in a more autonomous way than the adults. The results are discussed with regard to age of onset and the development of L1 and L2 discourse capacities.
Keywords: imparfait, child L2, adult L2, aspectual values, advanced stages of acquisition, French
References (72)
Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 591, 249–306.
Andersen, R. (1984). The one-to-one principle of interlanguage construction. Language Learning 341, 77–95.
. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect markers in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C.A. Ferguson (eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theory (305–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ayoun, D. (2004). The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study. Modern Language Journal 881, 1–55.
. (2013). The second language acquisition of French. tense, aspect, mood and modality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2005), Tracking the elusive imperfect in adult L2 acquisition: Refining the hunt. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (eds.), Aspectual inquiries (397–449). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bartning, I. (1997). L’apprenant dit avancé et son acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Tour d’horizon et esquisse d’une caractérisation de la variété avancée. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 91, 9–50.
Bartning, I & Schlyter, S. (2004). Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Language Studies 141, 281–299.
Bergström, A. (1995). The expression of temporal reference by English speaking learners of French. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
Berman, R. & Slobin, D.I. (eds.) (1994). Different ways of relating events in narrative: Crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Benazzo, S. & Starren, M. (2007). L’émergence de moyens grammaticaux pour exprimer les relations temporelles en L2. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 251, 129–158.
Berthonneau, A-M. & Kleiber, G. (1993). Pour une nouvelle approche de l’imparfait: l’imparfait, un temps anaphorique méronomique. Langages 1121, 55–73.
Blom, E., van de Craats, I. & Verhagen, J. (eds.) (2013). Dummy auxiliaries in first and second language acquisition. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. (1997). Relations entre grammaticalisation et conceptualisation et implications sur l’acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 91, 83–116.
Combettes, B., François, F., Noyau, C. & Vet, C. (1993). Les aspects dans le discours narratif. Verbum 41, 5–47.
Coppetiers, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and non-native speakers. Language 631, 544–573.
De Lorenzo, R.C. (2002). Les relations temporo-aspectuelles dans le récit oral en français et en castillan, langues premières et langues étrangères. Etude transversale du stade ultime de l’acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris X-Nanterre.
De Swart, H. (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 161, 347–385.
Devitt, S. (1992). Form and function in the developing verb systems of five learners of French as a second language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Dublin, Trinity College.
Dietrich, R., Klein, W. & Noyau, C. (eds.) (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fayol, M. (1985). Le récit et sa construction: Une approche de psychologie cognitive. Neuchâtel: Delachaux-Niestlé.
Giacalone Ramat, A. (2002). How do learners acquire the classical three categories of temporality? In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds.), Tense and aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (221–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Granfeldt, J., Schlyter, S. & Kihlstedt, M. (2007). French as cL2, 2L1 and L1 in pre-school children. PERLES 241, 7–42.
Harley, B. (1992). Patterns of second language development in French immersion. Journal of French Language Studies 21, 159–183.
Hickmann, M. & Hendriks, H. (in press). Time talk in child discourse. In J. Guéron (ed.), Tense, aspect and modality: From sentence grammar to discourse grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Howard, M. (2002). Les interrelations entre les facteurs contextuels contraignant l’emploi variable des temps du passé. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée VII(2), 31–42.
. (2005). The emergence and use of the plus-que-parfait in advanced French interlanguage. In J-M Dewaele (ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language: Multidisciplinary approaches (63–87). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
. (2009). Short-versus long-term effects of naturalistic exposure on the advanced instructed learner’s L2 development: A case study. In E. Labeau & F. Myles (eds.), The advanced learner variety: The case of French (92–123). Bern: Peter Lang.
Izquierdo, J. (2009). L’aspect lexical et le développement du passé composé et de l’imparfait en français L2: une étude quantitative auprès d’apprenants hispanophones. Canadian Modern Language Review 65(4), 587–613.
Izquierdo, J. & Collins, L. (2008). The facilitative role of L1 influence in tense–aspect marking: A comparison of Hispanophone and Anglophone learners of French. Modern Language Journal 921, 350–368.
Jakubowicz, C. (2003). Computational complexity and the acquisition of functional categories by French-speaking children with SLI. Linguistics 41(2), 175–211.
Kamp, H. & Rohrer, C. (1983). Tense in texts. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language (250–269). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kihlstedt, M. (1998). La référence au passé dans le dialogue. Etude de l’acquisition de la temporalité chez des apprenants dits avancés de français. Ph.D. dissertation. Stockholm: Akademitryck.
. (2002a). Reference to past events in dialogue. The acquisition of tense and aspect by advanced learners of French. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds.), Tense-Aspect Morphology in L2 Acquisition (323–362). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2002b). L’emploi de l’imparfait dans le dialogue chez des locuteurs suédophones et des locuteurs natifs. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée (RFLA) 7(2), 7–16.
Kihlstedt, M & Schlyter, S. (2009). Emploi de la morphologie temporelle en français L2: étude comparative auprès des enfants monolingues et bilingues de 8 à 9 ans. AILE-LIA 11, 89–115.
Kuteva, T. (1998). On identifying an evasive gram: Action narrowly averted. Studies in Language 221, 113–160.
Labeau, E. (2003). Beyond the aspect hypothesis. Tense-aspect development in advanced L2 French. Bern: Peter Lang.
. (2009). The imperfect mastery: The acquisition of the functions of imparfait by anglophone learners. In E. Labeau & F. Myles (eds.), The advanced learner variety: The case of French (92–123). Bern: Peter Lang.
Leclercq, P., Edmonds, A. & Hilton, H. (eds.) (2014). Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Malvern, D., Richards, B.J., Chipere, N. & Duran, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development. Quantification and assessment. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
McManus, K. (2013). Prototypical influence in second language acquisition: What now for the aspect hypothesis? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5(3), 299–322.
. (2015). L1-L2 differences in the acquisition of form-meaning pairings: A comparison of English and German learners of French. Canadian Modern Language Review. 71(2), 155–181.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk, 3rd Edition. Vol. 2: The database. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Meisel, J. (2008). Child second language or successive first language acquisition? In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition. A generative perspective (55–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (717–761). Oxford: Blackwell.
Noyau, C. (1997). Processus de grammaticalisation dans l’acquisition de langues étrangères: La morphologie temporelle. In C. Martinot (ed.), Actes du colloque international sur l’acquisition de la syntaxe en langue maternelle et en langue étrangère (223–252). Annales littéraires de l’Université de Franche-Comté.
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics 30(4), 590–601.
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistics Approaches to Bilingualism 1(3), 213–237.
Paradis, J., Le Corre, M. & Genesee, F. (1998). The emergence of tense and agreement in child L2 French. Second Language Research 14(3), 227–256.
Salaberry, R. (1998). The development of aspectual distinctions in academic L2 French. Canadian Modern Language Review 541, 508–542.
. (1999). The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics 20(2), 151–178.
. (2008). Marking past tense in second language acquisition: A theoretical model. London: Continuum.
Schlyter, S. (1993). The weaker language in bilingual Swedish-French children. In K. Hyltenstam & Å. Viberg (eds.), Progression and regression in English. Sociolinguistic, neuropsycholinguistic and linguistic perspectives (283–302). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (1996). Télicité, passé composé et types de discours dans l’acquisition du français langue étrangère. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée (RFLA) 11, 107–118.
. (2011). Tense and aspect in early French development in aL2, 2L1 and cL2 learners. In E. Rinke & T. Kupisch (eds.), The development of grammar. Language acquisition and diachronic change. In honour of Jürgen Meisel (47–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shirai, Y. (2010). Semantic bias and morphological regularity in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: What is the relation? Linguistics 481, 171–194.
Slobin, D. (1996). Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition and rhetorical style. Pragmatics 11, 7–26.
Tracy, R. & Thoma, D. (2009). Convergence on finite V2 clauses in L1, bilingual L1 and early L2 acquisition. In P. Jordens & C. Dimroth (eds.), Functional elements: Variation in learner systems (1–43). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Unsworth, S. (2005). Child L2, adult L2, child L1: Differences and similarities. A Study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch. Ph.D. dissertation. Utrecht: Lot.
Vendler, Z. (1967). Verbs and times. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Verhagen, J. (2013). From dummy auxiliary to auxiliary in Moroccan adult learners’ production and comprehension of Dutch. In E. Blom, I. van de Craatz & J. Verhagen (eds.), Dummy auxiliaries in first and second language acquisition (291–306). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Vet, C. (1991). The temporal structure of discourse: Setting, change and perspective. In S. Fleischmann & L. Waugh (eds.), Discourse pragmatics and the verb. The evidence from Romance (7–25). London/New York: Routledge.
von Stutterheim, Christiane. (2003). Linguistic structure and information organisation: The case of very advanced learners. In S. Foster-Cohen & S. Pekarek Doehler (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 3 (183–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Leclercq, Pascale
2025. L2-French acquisition of discursive competence. In Approaches and Methods in French Second Language Acquisition Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 9], ► pp. 174 ff.
Ågren, Malin
2025. Methodological considerations in the study of morphology in L2 French. In Approaches and Methods in French Second Language Acquisition Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 9], ► pp. 126 ff.
Raoprasert, Thatchanon & Athip Thumvichit
Thomas, Anita
Kihlstedt, Maria & Jesús Izquierdo
González, Paz & Tim Diaubalick
IZQUIERDO, JESÚS & MARIA KIHLSTEDT
McManus, Kevin
McManus, Kevin
McManus, Kevin
2022. Replication research in instructed SLA. In Research methods in instructed second language acquisition [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 103 ff.
McManus, Kevin
MCMANUS, KEVIN & EMMA MARSDEN
Granget, Cyrille, Marie-Ange Dat, Christine Cuet, Pascale El Haj, Fatima Albochi, Ashraf Allawama, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
